Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
California - falling falling trend - 28,702 118.2 (117.6, 118.9) - -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
Alameda County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,141 112.1 (109.1, 115.1) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Amador County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 122.4 (106.1, 141.3) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Butte County 5 falling falling trend higher 235 146.8 (138.2, 155.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Calaveras County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 120.1 (104.6, 137.7) 0.9 -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Colusa County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 122.7 (96.0, 154.7) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Contra Costa County 9 falling falling trend lower 905 115.8 (112.4, 119.3) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Del Norte County 6 stable stable trend similar 30 147.7 (124.1, 175.2) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
El Dorado County 9 falling falling trend lower 175 114.6 (106.8, 122.9) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Fresno County 8 falling falling trend similar 630 120.2 (116.0, 124.6) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Glenn County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 126.5 (104.0, 152.7) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Humboldt County 5 falling falling trend higher 137 145.4 (134.3, 157.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Imperial County 9 falling falling trend lower 96 98.3 (89.5, 107.7) 0.8 -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Inyo County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 116.3 (91.8, 146.4) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Kern County 8 falling falling trend similar 549 131.1 (126.2, 136.2) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Kings County 8 falling falling trend similar 82 125.7 (113.7, 138.7) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Lake County 5 falling falling trend higher 84 156.9 (141.3, 174.0) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Lassen County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 135.4 (110.6, 164.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Los Angeles County 8 falling falling trend similar 7,183 117.2 (116.0, 118.4) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.5, -1.4)
Madera County 8 falling falling trend similar 105 121.8 (111.5, 132.9) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Marin County 9 falling falling trend lower 236 99.2 (93.4, 105.3) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0)
Mariposa County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 128.0 (102.2, 160.0) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Mendocino County 8 falling falling trend similar 85 119.6 (107.8, 132.5) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 180 136.3 (127.5, 145.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Modoc County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 97.5 (68.8, 137.8) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Mono County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 60.8 (38.8, 91.6) 0.5 -3.7 (-5.7, -1.7)
Monterey County 9 falling falling trend lower 267 108.5 (102.6, 114.7) 0.8 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Napa County 8 falling falling trend similar 133 124.9 (115.3, 135.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Nevada County 8 falling falling trend similar 117 123.6 (112.8, 135.3) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 2,288 111.7 (109.6, 113.8) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Placer County 9 falling falling trend lower 350 111.6 (106.3, 117.2) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Plumas County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 128.7 (104.2, 158.8) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Riverside County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,749 119.8 (117.3, 122.4) 0.9 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Sacramento County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,252 132.2 (128.9, 135.6) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
San Benito County 9 falling falling trend lower 36 104.9 (89.9, 121.9) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
San Bernardino County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,466 132.6 (129.6, 135.8) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
San Diego County 8 falling falling trend similar 2,410 119.3 (117.1, 121.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
San Francisco County 9 falling falling trend lower 615 103.6 (99.9, 107.5) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
San Joaquin County 8 falling falling trend similar 530 126.6 (121.7, 131.6) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.7, -1.1)
San Luis Obispo County 9 falling falling trend lower 250 115.1 (108.4, 122.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
San Mateo County 9 falling falling trend lower 543 100.2 (96.4, 104.2) 0.8 -2.6 (-3.1, -2.2)
Santa Barbara County 9 falling falling trend lower 332 115.6 (109.9, 121.5) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,158 100.3 (97.7, 103.0) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Santa Cruz County 9 falling falling trend lower 193 107.5 (100.6, 114.8) 0.8 -2.4 (-2.9, -2.0)
Shasta County 8 falling falling trend similar 199 137.5 (128.7, 146.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Siskiyou County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 133.7 (117.2, 152.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Solano County 8 falling falling trend similar 383 130.4 (124.5, 136.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Sonoma County 8 falling falling trend similar 493 123.8 (118.7, 129.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Stanislaus County 8 falling falling trend similar 427 138.6 (132.7, 144.7) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Sutter County 8 falling falling trend similar 83 133.5 (120.7, 147.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Tehama County 8 falling falling trend similar 68 139.3 (124.4, 155.7) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Trinity County 9 falling falling trend lower 11 97.8 (72.0, 132.5) 0.8 -2.9 (-4.1, -1.5)
Tulare County 6 stable stable trend similar 280 123.9 (117.4, 130.6) 1.0 2.3 (-2.6, 7.4)
Tuolumne County 8 falling falling trend similar 73 139.7 (124.9, 156.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Ventura County 9 falling falling trend lower 647 115.9 (111.8, 120.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Yolo County 8 falling falling trend similar 143 123.8 (114.7, 133.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Yuba County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 156.8 (139.5, 175.6) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 2:09 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Sierra County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top