Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Colorado Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Colorado - falling falling trend - 3,769 113.1 (111.4, 114.7) - -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Yuma County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 144.2 (103.4, 196.4) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Weld County 8 8 falling falling trend similar 184 116.0 (108.5, 123.9) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 125.0 (77.6, 195.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Teller County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 111.7 (88.7, 139.6) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Summit County
**
** lower 9 67.8 (46.8, 94.7) 0.5
**
Sedgwick County
**
** similar 3 122.8 (69.3, 223.5) 1.0
**
San Miguel County
**
** similar 3 105.5 (54.7, 180.5) 0.8
**
San Juan County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Saguache County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 101.7 (64.5, 156.3) 0.8 -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Routt County 9 falling falling trend lower 10 81.9 (60.1, 109.2) 0.6 -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Rio Grande County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 101.6 (71.4, 141.4) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Rio Blanco County
**
** similar 4 118.7 (72.6, 184.1) 0.9
**
Pueblo County 8 falling falling trend similar 160 128.5 (119.4, 138.2) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Prowers County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 166.6 (129.4, 212.2) 1.3 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Pitkin County
**
** lower 7 56.7 (38.8, 81.2) 0.4
**
Phillips County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 98.5 (56.8, 165.1) 0.8 -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Park County 9 falling falling trend lower 11 80.9 (57.1, 112.5) 0.6 -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Ouray County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Otero County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 120.5 (96.2, 149.9) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Morgan County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 136.5 (113.0, 163.7) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Montrose County 9 falling falling trend lower 40 110.7 (94.8, 128.9) 0.9 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Montezuma County 9 falling falling trend lower 21 100.6 (81.4, 123.7) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Moffat County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 107.6 (76.9, 147.0) 0.8 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Mineral County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mesa County 8 falling falling trend similar 139 119.6 (110.6, 129.2) 0.9 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 130.1 (104.1, 161.4) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 140.4 (92.5, 209.5) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Las Animas County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 114.1 (88.7, 146.6) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Larimer County 9 falling falling trend lower 231 104.6 (98.5, 111.0) 0.8 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
La Plata County 9 falling falling trend lower 33 89.7 (75.9, 105.6) 0.7 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Kit Carson County
**
** lower 5 86.4 (55.5, 131.7) 0.7
**
Kiowa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jefferson County 8 9 falling falling trend lower 437 111.2 (106.5, 116.1) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Jackson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Huerfano County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 119.5 (78.4, 179.8) 0.9 -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Hinsdale County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gunnison County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 106.5 (75.3, 146.4) 0.8 -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Grand County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 73.1 (48.0, 107.1) 0.6 -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Gilpin County
**
** similar 3 110.3 (56.1, 194.0) 0.9
**
Garfield County 9 falling falling trend lower 33 104.1 (88.3, 122.0) 0.8 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Fremont County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 124.4 (107.8, 143.5) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Elbert County 9 falling falling trend lower 16 100.4 (78.1, 127.4) 0.8 -3.1 (-4.4, -1.9)
El Paso County 8 falling falling trend similar 477 123.6 (118.6, 128.7) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Eagle County 9 falling falling trend lower 16 70.2 (54.1, 89.3) 0.5 -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Douglas County 9 falling falling trend lower 171 100.2 (93.4, 107.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Dolores County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Denver County 8 falling falling trend similar 444 120.3 (115.2, 125.5) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Delta County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 122.6 (103.1, 145.4) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Custer County
**
** similar 7 149.9 (92.1, 238.4) 1.2
**
Crowley County
**
** similar 5 190.7 (114.6, 304.7) 1.5
**
Costilla County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Conejos County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 116.3 (79.0, 167.0) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Clear Creek County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 120.5 (81.5, 173.6) 0.9 -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Cheyenne County
**
** similar 3 245.1 (135.6, 419.2) 1.9
**
Chaffee County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 106.0 (83.9, 133.7) 0.8 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Broomfield County 8 7 stable stable trend lower 46 109.9 (96.0, 125.4) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Boulder County 8 9 falling falling trend lower 210 108.0 (101.4, 114.9) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Bent County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 99.2 (58.9, 166.2) 0.8 -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Baca County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 168.6 (107.5, 260.5) 1.3 -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Archuleta County
**
** lower 11 92.2 (67.5, 124.9) 0.7
**
Arapahoe County 9 falling falling trend lower 405 109.9 (105.0, 114.9) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Alamosa County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 101.5 (73.7, 136.7) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Adams County 8 8 falling falling trend similar 295 126.3 (119.8, 133.1) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2024 5:14 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected geographic areas.


Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Costilla County, Dolores County, Hinsdale County, Jackson County, Kiowa County, Lake County, Mineral County, Ouray County, San Juan County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Archuleta County, Cheyenne County, Crowley County, Custer County, Gilpin County, Kit Carson County, Pitkin County, Rio Blanco County, San Miguel County, Sedgwick County, Summit County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top