Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Illinois Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Illinois - falling falling trend - 11,712 135.7 (134.5, 136.8) - -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Cook County 8 falling falling trend similar 4,605 135.5 (133.7, 137.3) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
DuPage County 8 falling falling trend similar 740 118.7 (114.8, 122.7) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 565 130.9 (126.0, 136.0) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Will County 8 falling falling trend similar 534 135.0 (129.9, 140.3) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Kane County 8 falling falling trend similar 372 118.9 (113.5, 124.5) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Winnebago County 5 falling falling trend higher 307 149.9 (142.3, 157.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 291 146.2 (138.5, 154.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
St. Clair County 5 falling falling trend higher 272 148.3 (140.3, 156.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
McHenry County 8 falling falling trend similar 259 135.1 (127.7, 142.9) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Sangamon County 8 falling falling trend similar 209 139.4 (130.8, 148.5) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Peoria County 5 falling falling trend higher 183 143.6 (134.2, 153.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Rock Island County 8 falling falling trend similar 157 138.8 (128.8, 149.4) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Tazewell County 8 falling falling trend similar 140 135.5 (125.4, 146.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
La Salle County 5 falling falling trend higher 133 155.4 (143.3, 168.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Champaign County 9 falling falling trend lower 130 114.0 (105.1, 123.4) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 128 130.6 (120.4, 141.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Kankakee County 5 falling falling trend higher 124 165.7 (152.6, 179.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Macon County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 141.2 (129.8, 153.5) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Vermilion County 4 stable stable trend higher 98 164.1 (149.4, 180.0) 1.3 -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
DeKalb County 4 stable stable trend higher 86 150.2 (136.0, 165.4) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 137.6 (123.0, 153.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Kendall County 8 falling falling trend similar 70 121.5 (108.8, 135.2) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Williamson County 8 falling falling trend similar 70 134.4 (120.3, 149.9) 1.0 -4.8 (-9.0, -0.4)
Whiteside County 4 stable stable trend higher 69 145.6 (130.0, 162.9) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Knox County 4 stable stable trend higher 64 149.7 (132.6, 168.6) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Ogle County 4 stable stable trend higher 61 156.9 (139.3, 176.3) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Henry County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 137.5 (121.3, 155.7) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Stephenson County 6 stable stable trend similar 54 132.4 (116.0, 150.7) 1.0 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Marion County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 177.2 (155.5, 201.5) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Macoupin County 8 falling falling trend similar 51 134.9 (118.2, 153.6) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Coles County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 138.4 (121.0, 157.8) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 138.5 (120.9, 158.0) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Grundy County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 154.1 (134.8, 175.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 147.7 (128.6, 169.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Livingston County 4 stable stable trend higher 46 160.6 (139.5, 184.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Christian County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 168.0 (145.9, 193.1) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Fulton County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 157.6 (136.2, 181.9) 1.2 9.1 (-9.5, 31.7)
Boone County 6 stable stable trend similar 42 122.7 (106.5, 140.8) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Iroquois County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 171.3 (147.3, 198.8) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Morgan County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 144.9 (124.7, 168.1) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Bureau County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 138.4 (119.0, 160.6) 1.1 4.7 (-4.2, 14.5)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 138.8 (119.7, 160.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Lee County 5 falling falling trend higher 40 151.6 (130.3, 175.9) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Woodford County 6 stable stable trend similar 38 132.4 (113.1, 154.2) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Randolph County 6 stable stable trend similar 38 147.6 (126.1, 172.4) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 166.2 (141.8, 194.1) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Saline County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 178.5 (152.3, 208.7) 1.4 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 129.3 (109.6, 151.8) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 129.6 (109.2, 153.4) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
McDonough County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 149.2 (125.5, 176.5) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Effingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 121.7 (103.0, 143.3) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 122.5 (103.3, 144.6) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jersey County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 160.2 (133.6, 191.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Crawford County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 171.5 (142.3, 205.9) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Jo Daviess County 9 falling falling trend lower 25 107.8 (89.0, 131.0) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Perry County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 149.0 (121.5, 181.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Shelby County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 111.6 (91.4, 136.2) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
De Witt County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 174.6 (142.6, 212.7) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 130.5 (106.1, 159.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 154.6 (125.2, 189.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 176.9 (143.0, 217.9) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Mercer County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 158.9 (129.6, 194.4) 1.2 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 155.0 (125.2, 190.7) 1.2 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Edgar County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 134.2 (108.2, 165.8) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Union County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 146.7 (118.9, 180.3) 1.1 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Hancock County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 117.5 (94.9, 145.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Pike County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 138.2 (111.4, 170.9) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
White County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 148.2 (119.0, 184.2) 1.2 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 137.5 (108.6, 173.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Bond County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 142.8 (113.2, 178.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Richland County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 134.4 (106.4, 168.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Massac County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 141.7 (111.8, 178.4) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Clark County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 133.0 (104.7, 167.6) 1.0 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Lawrence County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 140.7 (111.0, 177.3) 1.1 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Piatt County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 133.6 (105.2, 168.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Warren County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 127.3 (99.6, 161.0) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 150.1 (117.8, 189.8) 1.2 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Greene County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 159.0 (125.7, 200.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Ford County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 136.4 (107.2, 172.7) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Marshall County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 146.6 (114.2, 187.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 123.6 (95.9, 158.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Wabash County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 128.7 (97.8, 168.2) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Moultrie County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 126.0 (96.4, 162.6) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 148.2 (113.3, 191.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 135.2 (102.9, 176.4) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Menard County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 135.7 (102.7, 177.1) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Cumberland County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 133.4 (98.8, 177.6) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 130.5 (94.0, 179.3) 1.0 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Henderson County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 163.0 (114.3, 228.4) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Pulaski County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 212.3 (152.9, 290.5) 1.6 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Gallatin County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 207.5 (145.8, 290.4) 1.6 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Jasper County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 106.4 (75.9, 147.4) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Edwards County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 146.8 (103.3, 205.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Alexander County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 142.5 (98.4, 203.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Schuyler County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 122.2 (83.6, 176.7) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Scott County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 179.8 (123.7, 256.8) 1.4 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 164.8 (111.2, 239.8) 1.3 -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Hardin County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 161.6 (108.8, 241.5) 1.3 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Putnam County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 125.7 (83.1, 187.3) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Stark County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 114.7 (70.6, 179.5) 0.9 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Calhoun County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 101.5 (64.7, 159.9) 0.8 -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Pope County
**
** similar 5 137.0 (84.1, 222.7) 1.1
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2024 3:41 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Pope County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top