Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Minnesota Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Minnesota - falling falling trend - 4,694 125.0 (123.4, 126.7) - -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Chippewa County 1 rising rising trend higher 19 175.1 (138.7, 219.7) 1.4 1.8 (0.9, 2.7)
Chisago County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 150.4 (132.5, 170.2) 1.2 9.4 (-1.9, 22.0)
Mahnomen County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 203.6 (142.5, 284.6) 1.6 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Wadena County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 166.8 (132.3, 208.8) 1.3 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Becker County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 118.2 (100.0, 139.3) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Carlton County 6 stable stable trend similar 31 117.2 (99.1, 138.3) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Cass County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 135.9 (114.4, 160.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 48 131.4 (114.7, 149.8) 1.0 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Clearwater County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 139.5 (100.6, 190.2) 1.1 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Cook County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 117.3 (75.4, 180.7) 0.9 -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Cottonwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 131.9 (101.2, 171.2) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Dodge County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 106.5 (82.4, 135.8) 0.8 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 47 144.2 (124.9, 166.1) 1.1 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Faribault County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 149.2 (119.2, 186.3) 1.2 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 104.5 (64.2, 163.8) 0.8 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Hubbard County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 138.0 (112.8, 168.2) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Isanti County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 129.7 (110.9, 151.0) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 115.4 (83.0, 158.5) 0.9 -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Kittson County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 151.4 (98.1, 230.2) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Lac qui Parle County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 158.6 (109.9, 224.9) 1.2 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 127.8 (104.0, 155.8) 1.0 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 105.8 (73.8, 149.1) 0.8 -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Martin County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 151.2 (124.1, 183.5) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
McLeod County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 121.3 (102.9, 142.3) 0.9 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Murray County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 108.4 (78.3, 150.2) 0.8 -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Nicollet County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 113.1 (94.0, 135.3) 0.9 4.3 (-5.6, 15.3)
Nobles County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 131.8 (105.6, 162.9) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Norman County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 123.3 (83.1, 179.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Pennington County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 145.9 (114.0, 184.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Pine County 6 stable stable trend similar 31 130.7 (110.3, 154.5) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pipestone County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 129.4 (95.7, 173.5) 1.0 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Polk County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 145.3 (123.4, 170.4) 1.1 -7.1 (-22.5, 11.4)
Redwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 133.9 (104.1, 170.6) 1.0 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Renville County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 134.1 (104.4, 170.7) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Rock County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 124.7 (90.8, 169.2) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Sibley County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 160.9 (127.9, 200.8) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Stevens County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 106.5 (71.1, 154.4) 0.8 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Traverse County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 99.1 (57.5, 173.9) 0.8 -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Waseca County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 145.7 (117.8, 178.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Watonwan County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 146.8 (110.2, 193.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Wilkin County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 143.3 (97.2, 207.0) 1.1 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Yellow Medicine County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 117.9 (85.9, 160.3) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Aitkin County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 137.0 (109.8, 171.1) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Anoka County 8 falling falling trend similar 273 130.0 (123.1, 137.2) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Beltrami County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 130.6 (112.3, 151.2) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 130.3 (110.6, 152.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Big Stone County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 114.5 (75.8, 173.9) 0.9 -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Blue Earth County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 115.2 (100.5, 131.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Brown County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 114.8 (94.0, 139.6) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Crow Wing County 8 falling falling trend similar 67 120.2 (107.1, 134.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Dakota County 8 falling falling trend similar 323 123.1 (117.1, 129.4) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Fillmore County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 126.8 (103.0, 155.3) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Freeborn County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 119.6 (100.7, 141.5) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Goodhue County 8 falling falling trend similar 49 127.1 (111.0, 145.4) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hennepin County 8 falling falling trend similar 934 120.7 (117.1, 124.3) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Itasca County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 135.1 (118.2, 154.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Kanabec County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 125.0 (97.6, 158.8) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Kandiyohi County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 141.1 (122.0, 162.5) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Koochiching County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 137.5 (107.7, 175.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 136.3 (102.0, 180.8) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Le Sueur County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 128.7 (107.0, 153.8) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 174.3 (122.9, 244.3) 1.4 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Meeker County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 140.3 (116.7, 168.0) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Mille Lacs County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 151.4 (127.2, 179.5) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Morrison County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 129.2 (109.4, 152.0) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Mower County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 133.6 (115.0, 154.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Otter Tail County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 116.3 (102.9, 131.2) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Pope County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 107.8 (77.3, 148.2) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Ramsey County 8 falling falling trend similar 456 130.9 (125.4, 136.5) 1.0 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Rice County 8 falling falling trend similar 55 131.0 (115.6, 148.2) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Roseau County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 112.3 (85.4, 146.1) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Scott County 8 falling falling trend similar 91 127.6 (115.9, 140.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Sherburne County 8 falling falling trend similar 57 117.9 (104.3, 132.9) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
St. Louis County 8 falling falling trend similar 208 133.0 (124.6, 141.8) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Stearns County 8 falling falling trend similar 121 122.3 (112.5, 132.8) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Steele County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 111.9 (94.3, 132.1) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Swift County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 130.7 (93.3, 179.8) 1.0 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Wabasha County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 120.5 (98.4, 147.0) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 198 122.3 (114.7, 130.4) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Winona County 8 falling falling trend similar 45 132.5 (114.7, 152.5) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Wright County 8 falling falling trend similar 95 128.7 (117.2, 141.1) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Carver County 9 falling falling trend lower 57 101.7 (90.0, 114.6) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Houston County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 105.0 (82.7, 132.6) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Olmsted County 9 falling falling trend lower 114 107.3 (98.5, 116.7) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Todd County 9 falling falling trend lower 20 100.4 (80.6, 124.4) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Red Lake County
**
** similar 4 137.2 (82.9, 219.5) 1.1
**
Lake of the Woods County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/06/2024 1:05 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Lake of the Woods County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Red Lake County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top