Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Carolina Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
North Carolina - falling falling trend - 9,296 131.0 (129.8, 132.2) - -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Swain County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 189.4 (153.4, 232.3) 1.5 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Scotland County 4 stable stable trend higher 48 186.9 (163.1, 213.5) 1.5 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Onslow County 4 stable stable trend higher 143 181.0 (167.8, 194.9) 1.4 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Halifax County 4 stable stable trend higher 71 165.8 (148.3, 185.2) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Vance County 5 falling falling trend higher 56 164.5 (145.1, 186.1) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Graham County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 162.8 (123.1, 214.3) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Bertie County 1 rising rising trend higher 27 160.1 (131.4, 194.3) 1.2 4.3 (0.0, 8.7)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 156.7 (122.8, 198.8) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 135 156.2 (144.4, 168.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Anson County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 154.5 (129.0, 184.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Hyde County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 152.1 (102.9, 224.0) 1.2 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Nash County 5 falling falling trend higher 110 151.9 (139.0, 165.7) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Surry County 4 stable stable trend higher 92 151.4 (137.5, 166.5) 1.2 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Randolph County 4 stable stable trend higher 157 151.1 (140.5, 162.3) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Cumberland County 5 falling falling trend higher 269 150.0 (142.0, 158.4) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Granville County 4 stable stable trend higher 65 149.9 (133.6, 167.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Pasquotank County 5 falling falling trend higher 42 149.7 (129.5, 172.4) 1.2 -2.5 (-4.4, -0.5)
Cleveland County 4 stable stable trend higher 111 149.3 (136.8, 162.7) 1.2 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Stokes County 4 stable stable trend higher 58 148.9 (131.8, 168.0) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
McDowell County 4 stable stable trend higher 54 148.8 (130.8, 169.1) 1.2 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Columbus County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 148.8 (132.8, 166.6) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Robeson County 5 falling falling trend higher 125 148.7 (137.1, 161.2) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Craven County 5 falling falling trend higher 113 147.6 (135.1, 161.1) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Richmond County 6 stable stable trend similar 49 147.1 (128.7, 167.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Caswell County 6 stable stable trend similar 29 146.8 (122.6, 175.4) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Martin County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 146.4 (122.9, 173.8) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Davidson County 4 stable stable trend higher 182 146.2 (136.7, 156.3) 1.1 -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Rowan County 4 stable stable trend higher 150 146.0 (135.5, 157.2) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Lenoir County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 145.1 (129.3, 162.6) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Cherokee County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 145.1 (124.2, 169.5) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Carteret County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 145.0 (131.3, 160.1) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Edgecombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 143.3 (127.2, 161.1) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Person County 6 stable stable trend similar 46 142.8 (124.2, 163.7) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Alamance County 5 falling falling trend higher 173 142.1 (132.6, 152.2) 1.1 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Hoke County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 141.6 (120.7, 165.0) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Harnett County 8 falling falling trend similar 104 141.3 (129.3, 154.2) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Caldwell County 6 stable stable trend similar 92 140.9 (128.0, 155.1) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Perquimans County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 140.6 (111.9, 176.4) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Sampson County 6 stable stable trend similar 66 140.6 (125.4, 157.4) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Mitchell County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 139.9 (110.8, 175.7) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Gaston County 8 falling falling trend similar 215 139.0 (130.7, 147.8) 1.1 -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Forsyth County 8 falling falling trend similar 362 138.1 (131.7, 144.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Wilkes County 8 falling falling trend similar 79 138.1 (124.1, 153.3) 1.1 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Bladen County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 138.0 (117.8, 161.0) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 83 136.5 (123.4, 150.8) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Avery County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 136.2 (108.8, 169.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Alexander County 6 stable stable trend similar 39 136.2 (117.1, 158.0) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Chowan County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 136.1 (106.5, 172.9) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 64 135.6 (120.7, 152.1) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Gates County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 134.1 (100.5, 177.0) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Davie County 6 stable stable trend similar 48 133.6 (116.7, 152.8) 1.0 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Johnston County 8 falling falling trend similar 160 133.6 (124.3, 143.4) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Rockingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 103 133.4 (121.8, 146.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Yadkin County 6 stable stable trend similar 42 133.4 (115.4, 153.8) 1.0 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Iredell County 8 falling falling trend similar 158 133.3 (124.0, 143.1) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pender County 6 stable stable trend similar 58 133.0 (117.8, 149.9) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Burke County 8 falling falling trend similar 98 132.0 (120.2, 144.8) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Stanly County 8 falling falling trend similar 62 132.0 (117.4, 148.1) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Yancey County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 130.1 (106.0, 159.4) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Lee County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 129.9 (114.8, 146.5) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Buncombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 271 129.3 (122.3, 136.7) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Rutherford County 8 falling falling trend similar 72 128.8 (115.3, 143.7) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Moore County 8 falling falling trend similar 119 128.3 (117.5, 140.0) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Beaufort County 6 stable stable trend similar 54 128.3 (112.5, 146.0) 1.0 -13.1 (-26.4, 2.6)
Pamlico County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 128.2 (97.5, 168.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.3)
Warren County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 128.2 (103.6, 157.9) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Cabarrus County 8 falling falling trend similar 159 128.0 (119.2, 137.4) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Henderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 146 128.0 (118.3, 138.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Dare County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 126.7 (108.4, 147.8) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Guilford County 8 falling falling trend similar 447 126.6 (121.3, 132.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Ashe County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 126.3 (106.5, 149.7) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Haywood County 8 falling falling trend similar 75 125.9 (112.9, 140.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Durham County 8 falling falling trend similar 231 125.6 (118.3, 133.3) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Pitt County 8 falling falling trend similar 131 124.5 (114.9, 134.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Catawba County 8 falling falling trend similar 143 124.5 (115.3, 134.3) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Union County 8 falling falling trend similar 162 124.3 (115.7, 133.3) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
New Hanover County 8 falling falling trend similar 209 123.6 (116.0, 131.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 123.0 (92.6, 163.2) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Greene County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 122.8 (97.0, 153.9) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Wilson County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 121.6 (109.5, 134.7) 0.9 -3.5 (-5.8, -1.2)
Duplin County 8 falling falling trend similar 52 119.9 (105.1, 136.4) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Northampton County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 119.9 (95.9, 149.2) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Alleghany County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 119.7 (90.9, 157.7) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 117.6 (95.7, 144.0) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Jones County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 117.5 (86.4, 159.2) 0.9 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 117.3 (100.3, 136.8) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Hertford County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 117.2 (95.4, 143.3) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Mecklenburg County 8 falling falling trend similar 669 116.6 (112.6, 120.7) 0.9 -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Brunswick County 8 falling falling trend similar 161 116.0 (107.3, 125.4) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Macon County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 114.9 (98.9, 133.4) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 99 114.7 (104.6, 125.6) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 114.6 (95.0, 137.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Wake County 9 falling falling trend lower 648 113.7 (109.8, 117.8) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Currituck County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 111.8 (90.6, 137.0) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 110.3 (89.2, 136.5) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Chatham County 9 falling falling trend lower 75 107.6 (96.5, 119.9) 0.8 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Watauga County 9 falling falling trend lower 36 104.6 (89.3, 122.1) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Transylvania County 9 falling falling trend lower 39 101.5 (87.0, 118.8) 0.8 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Camden County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 74.6 (48.5, 111.2) 0.6 -3.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Tyrrell County
**
** similar 4 132.3 (82.1, 212.0) 1.0
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2024 9:37 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Tyrrell County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top