Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Washington Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Washington - falling falling trend - 6,051 127.5 (126.0, 129.0) - -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
Wahkiakum County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 97.4 (57.1, 166.6) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Columbia County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.8 (99.9, 218.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Skamania County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 92.2 (65.2, 128.6) 0.7 -8.5 (-13.3, -3.3)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 103.0 (74.7, 138.2) 0.8 -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Ferry County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 158.7 (115.2, 216.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 132.0 (98.0, 176.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Pend Oreille County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 125.3 (97.5, 160.9) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
San Juan County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 120.4 (95.7, 151.9) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Whitman County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 111.1 (91.8, 133.4) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Asotin County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 122.1 (100.7, 147.7) 0.9 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Klickitat County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 147.2 (121.5, 177.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Pacific County 6 stable stable trend similar 33 144.4 (121.0, 172.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 122.8 (104.7, 143.3) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Kittitas County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 120.7 (103.2, 140.6) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 127.6 (111.4, 145.4) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Stevens County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 126.2 (109.5, 145.0) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 49 134.4 (115.0, 157.3) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Okanogan County 4 stable stable trend higher 51 155.7 (136.2, 177.5) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Walla Walla County 6 stable stable trend similar 55 125.0 (109.7, 141.9) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Grant County 8 falling falling trend similar 69 132.0 (118.2, 146.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Chelan County 8 falling falling trend similar 72 128.3 (114.9, 142.9) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Mason County 8 falling falling trend similar 72 133.5 (119.5, 149.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Grays Harbor County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 161.0 (146.3, 177.0) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Lewis County 5 falling falling trend higher 96 149.5 (136.1, 164.1) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Island County 6 stable stable trend similar 97 135.0 (122.4, 148.8) 1.0 2.5 (-0.2, 5.4)
Clallam County 8 falling falling trend similar 111 136.9 (124.6, 150.4) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Cowlitz County 5 falling falling trend higher 125 156.3 (143.9, 169.7) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Skagit County 8 falling falling trend similar 133 133.1 (122.8, 144.2) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 151 123.4 (114.6, 132.8) 1.0 -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Whatcom County 8 falling falling trend similar 187 124.4 (116.3, 132.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Yakima County 5 falling falling trend higher 202 141.8 (133.0, 151.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Kitsap County 8 falling falling trend similar 228 123.2 (115.9, 130.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Thurston County 8 falling falling trend similar 259 131.2 (123.9, 138.8) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Clark County 8 falling falling trend similar 403 134.7 (128.7, 140.8) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Spokane County 5 falling falling trend higher 487 142.5 (136.8, 148.5) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Snohomish County 8 falling falling trend similar 624 132.2 (127.5, 137.1) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Pierce County 8 falling falling trend similar 697 133.0 (128.6, 137.6) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
King County 9 falling falling trend lower 1,424 111.3 (108.7, 114.0) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Garfield County
**
** similar 3 131.2 (74.1, 235.8) 1.0
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 12:00 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Garfield County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top