Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

West Virginia Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by rate
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
West Virginia - falling falling trend - 2,136 151.4 (148.4, 154.4) - -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Ritchie County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 102.3 (73.2, 141.9) 0.8 -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Hardy County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 112.1 (85.2, 146.4) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 113.8 (79.0, 163.0) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Pendleton County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 119.7 (86.6, 167.3) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Wirt County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 121.5 (76.2, 187.0) 0.9 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Monongalia County 8 falling falling trend similar 70 126.5 (113.2, 140.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 127.3 (108.3, 149.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 128.7 (97.5, 168.7) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 129.6 (109.7, 152.8) 1.0 -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Pocahontas County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 134.4 (97.2, 184.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Summers County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 137.8 (107.7, 175.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Taylor County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 138.4 (110.9, 171.8) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Preston County 6 stable stable trend similar 35 139.0 (118.6, 162.4) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Putnam County 8 falling falling trend similar 58 140.1 (124.1, 157.9) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 141.3 (123.2, 161.7) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Tyler County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 141.4 (106.2, 187.8) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Marion County 8 falling falling trend similar 60 141.5 (125.2, 159.5) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Mason County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 141.8 (120.4, 166.7) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Cabell County 5 falling falling trend higher 100 142.3 (129.6, 156.1) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Mineral County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 145.2 (122.3, 171.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Nicholas County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 146.0 (122.5, 173.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Kanawha County 5 falling falling trend higher 222 147.8 (138.9, 157.3) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Brooke County 6 stable stable trend similar 30 148.7 (124.6, 177.2) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Ohio County 5 falling falling trend higher 57 150.8 (132.3, 171.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Greenbrier County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 151.7 (131.9, 174.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Wood County 4 stable stable trend higher 105 152.5 (139.2, 166.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 84 154.2 (139.2, 170.5) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 154.6 (132.8, 179.7) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Raleigh County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 156.2 (141.6, 172.1) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Braxton County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 156.4 (125.9, 193.8) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Wetzel County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 156.7 (127.6, 191.9) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Berkeley County 5 falling falling trend higher 109 157.0 (143.8, 171.2) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 60 158.6 (140.7, 178.2) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Randolph County 4 stable stable trend higher 38 159.8 (136.9, 186.2) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Hampshire County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 160.3 (134.0, 191.1) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Mercer County 4 stable stable trend higher 82 164.0 (147.4, 182.1) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Tucker County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 165.2 (120.5, 225.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Gilmer County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 167.1 (119.6, 230.9) 1.3 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Monroe County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 167.1 (134.8, 206.7) 1.3 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Barbour County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 168.0 (135.6, 206.7) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Mingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 168.5 (141.6, 199.7) 1.3 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Roane County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 169.8 (136.0, 210.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 170.8 (141.2, 206.0) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Boone County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 171.6 (143.6, 204.3) 1.3 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Upshur County 4 stable stable trend higher 32 173.0 (146.3, 203.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Pleasants County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 176.7 (127.9, 240.7) 1.4 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Wyoming County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 177.5 (148.6, 211.1) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Logan County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 179.1 (156.0, 205.1) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Fayette County 4 stable stable trend higher 63 179.2 (159.2, 201.6) 1.4 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 180.0 (135.5, 236.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Doddridge County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 181.3 (135.7, 240.8) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 181.9 (152.0, 216.7) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 185.2 (138.5, 244.8) 1.4 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 188.7 (155.2, 228.3) 1.5 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
McDowell County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 189.1 (158.1, 225.5) 1.5 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2024 3:12 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top