Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

New York Counties versus United States

Colon & Rectum

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 52,648 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) - -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
New York - falling - 2,807 10.9 (10.7, 11.1) - -2.9 (-3.1, -2.5)
Bronx County 9 falling lower 161 10.5 (9.8, 11.3) 0.8 -5.2 (-8.8, -4.1)
Cayuga County 9 falling lower 11 9.6 (7.1, 12.8) 0.7 -3.2 (-5.0, -1.6)
Dutchess County 9 falling lower 36 8.8 (7.5, 10.2) 0.7 -4.4 (-5.1, -3.8)
Kings County 9 falling lower 312 10.4 (9.9, 10.9) 0.8 -4.3 (-8.3, -3.6)
New York County 9 falling lower 188 8.8 (8.2, 9.4) 0.7 -3.9 (-4.4, -3.3)
Onondaga County 9 falling lower 67 10.8 (9.6, 12.0) 0.8 -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
Queens County 9 falling lower 291 9.6 (9.1, 10.1) 0.7 -5.1 (-9.2, -3.5)
Rensselaer County 9 falling lower 21 10.3 (8.4, 12.6) 0.8 -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Tompkins County 9 falling lower 9 7.6 (5.4, 10.3) 0.6 -4.7 (-7.2, -2.7)
Westchester County 9 falling lower 126 9.1 (8.3, 9.8) 0.7 -3.7 (-4.1, -3.4)
Albany County 8 falling similar 48 11.6 (10.1, 13.2) 0.9 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.6)
Allegany County 8 falling similar 9 14.1 (10.2, 19.1) 1.1 -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Broome County 8 falling similar 37 12.9 (11.0, 15.0) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.6)
Cattaraugus County 8 falling similar 13 12.3 (9.4, 15.9) 1.0 -3.1 (-5.4, -1.2)
Chautauqua County 8 falling similar 23 12.7 (10.4, 15.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
Delaware County 8 falling similar 9 11.9 (8.5, 16.5) 0.9 -3.8 (-5.7, -2.2)
Essex County 8 falling similar 9 13.9 (9.9, 19.3) 1.1 -3.6 (-6.9, -0.8)
Franklin County 8 falling similar 10 15.3 (11.2, 20.7) 1.2 -2.1 (-4.3, 0.0)
Fulton County 8 falling similar 10 12.8 (9.3, 17.2) 1.0 -3.7 (-5.1, -2.6)
Genesee County 8 falling similar 10 12.1 (8.9, 16.2) 0.9 -2.9 (-4.8, -1.3)
Greene County 8 falling similar 11 15.0 (11.1, 20.0) 1.2 -3.0 (-5.0, -1.2)
Lewis County 8 falling similar 7 19.2 (13.2, 27.2) 1.5 -2.5 (-5.1, 0.0)
Madison County 8 falling similar 12 14.1 (10.7, 18.4) 1.1 -3.0 (-4.7, -1.5)
Montgomery County 8 falling similar 7 10.5 (7.3, 14.8) 0.8 -3.6 (-6.5, -1.2)
Oneida County 8 falling similar 40 12.5 (10.8, 14.5) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3)
Ontario County 8 falling similar 19 10.9 (8.8, 13.4) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Orange County 8 falling similar 55 12.2 (10.8, 13.8) 1.0 -3.3 (-4.8, -2.0)
Oswego County 8 falling similar 20 13.1 (10.6, 16.1) 1.0 -2.8 (-4.5, -1.3)
Putnam County 8 falling similar 15 11.6 (9.1, 14.7) 0.9 -3.4 (-5.2, -1.7)
Richmond County 8 falling similar 78 12.4 (11.1, 13.7) 1.0 -2.7 (-3.4, -0.6)
Schoharie County 8 falling similar 6 12.8 (8.4, 19.0) 1.0 -3.6 (-7.1, -0.7)
Seneca County 8 falling similar 5 10.1 (6.3, 15.6) 0.8 -2.9 (-6.2, -0.1)
Sullivan County 8 falling similar 13 12.1 (9.2, 15.6) 0.9 -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Tioga County 8 falling similar 8 11.1 (7.7, 15.5) 0.9 -3.2 (-5.8, -1.0)
Ulster County 8 falling similar 35 13.2 (11.2, 15.5) 1.0 -3.0 (-4.3, -1.9)
Warren County 8 falling similar 10 10.4 (7.7, 13.9) 0.8 -3.4 (-5.9, -1.2)
Wyoming County 8 falling similar 9 15.2 (10.9, 20.9) 1.2 -3.3 (-6.7, -0.5)
Yates County 8 falling similar 4 11.8 (7.2, 18.5) 0.9 -3.6 (-5.9, -1.7)
Nassau County 7 stable lower 197 10.3 (9.7, 11.0) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.1, 2.4)
Rockland County 7 stable lower 39 9.6 (8.3, 11.1) 0.7 -2.4 (-4.0, 2.5)
Suffolk County 7 stable lower 229 11.2 (10.6, 11.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.1, 2.8)
Chemung County 6 stable similar 14 12.1 (9.4, 15.5) 0.9 14.7 (-4.0, 28.7)
Columbia County 6 stable similar 14 12.7 (9.7, 16.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.5, 0.3)
Cortland County 6 stable similar 7 12.5 (8.6, 17.5) 1.0 -1.7 (-4.8, 10.7)
Erie County 6 stable similar 157 12.2 (11.3, 13.1) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.7, 2.8)
Herkimer County 6 stable similar 11 12.8 (9.6, 16.9) 1.0 -0.7 (-9.9, 9.7)
Livingston County 6 stable similar 11 13.8 (10.4, 18.2) 1.1 -2.0 (-4.4, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 stable similar 117 11.7 (10.8, 12.8) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.9, 5.5)
Niagara County 6 stable similar 42 14.1 (12.2, 16.2) 1.1 4.8 (-0.8, 18.5)
Otsego County 6 stable similar 13 14.5 (11.0, 19.0) 1.1 18.1 (-1.6, 32.6)
Saratoga County 6 stable similar 38 11.5 (9.9, 13.3) 0.9 -0.5 (-2.8, 7.5)
Washington County 6 stable similar 15 15.6 (12.1, 19.8) 1.2 0.2 (-2.1, 10.0)
Wayne County 6 stable similar 18 13.3 (10.5, 16.5) 1.0 -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Chenango County 4 stable higher 12 17.6 (13.2, 23.2) 1.4 20.4 (-2.0, 37.9)
Clinton County 4 stable higher 17 16.5 (13.1, 20.6) 1.3 -2.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Jefferson County 4 stable higher 20 16.2 (13.1, 19.9) 1.3 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.3)
Orleans County 4 stable higher 10 18.8 (13.9, 25.2) 1.5 -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
St. Lawrence County 4 stable higher 24 16.8 (13.9, 20.3) 1.3 4.5 (-1.4, 19.9)
Steuben County 4 stable higher 23 16.8 (13.8, 20.4) 1.3 1.7 (-0.6, 10.1)
Schenectady County 3 rising lower 21 10.5 (8.5, 12.8) 0.8 15.6 (3.4, 25.9)
Schuyler County
**
** similar 4 12.7 (7.3, 21.2) 1.0
**
Hamilton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 3:39 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Hamilton County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Schuyler County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top