Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Tennessee Counties versus United States

Colon & Rectum

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rate

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 52,648 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) - -0.8 (-1.5, -0.4)
Tennessee - stable - 1,280 15.2 (14.8, 15.5) - 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Haywood County 4 stable higher 7 30.3 (20.6, 43.2) 2.4 1.2 (-2.1, 4.5)
Benton County 1 rising higher 7 26.6 (17.7, 39.1) 2.1 17.7 (9.0, 40.1)
Overton County 1 rising higher 8 26.5 (18.5, 37.0) 2.1 5.3 (0.6, 21.7)
Henderson County 4 stable higher 9 23.0 (16.5, 31.3) 1.8 1.7 (-0.6, 4.5)
Fentress County 4 stable higher 6 22.9 (15.4, 33.3) 1.8 -1.9 (-5.0, 1.4)
Polk County 4 stable higher 6 22.2 (14.5, 33.0) 1.7 -1.0 (-4.0, 2.0)
Unicoi County 4 stable higher 6 22.0 (14.5, 32.5) 1.7 0.3 (-3.5, 4.3)
Tipton County 4 stable higher 15 21.8 (17.0, 27.6) 1.7 -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
Cannon County 6 stable similar 4 21.7 (13.3, 33.9) 1.7 -0.2 (-3.3, 3.3)
Warren County 1 rising higher 12 21.6 (16.3, 28.2) 1.7 8.8 (0.1, 28.7)
Sequatchie County 2 rising similar 5 21.1 (13.4, 32.1) 1.6 28.9 (0.0, 59.2)
Lauderdale County 4 stable higher 6 20.9 (13.8, 30.4) 1.6 -2.2 (-4.8, 0.1)
Marshall County 4 stable higher 9 20.9 (14.9, 28.5) 1.6 0.1 (-2.3, 2.7)
Dickson County 4 stable higher 13 20.6 (15.8, 26.4) 1.6 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Cheatham County 4 stable higher 9 20.4 (14.7, 27.7) 1.6 1.5 (-1.0, 4.9)
McNairy County 4 stable higher 8 20.3 (14.3, 28.2) 1.6 -0.4 (-2.5, 1.9)
Jackson County 6 stable similar 4 20.1 (12.3, 32.4) 1.6 -0.4 (-3.4, 3.3)
Obion County 4 stable higher 9 20.0 (14.3, 27.5) 1.6 -1.5 (-4.3, 1.1)
Weakley County 4 stable higher 9 19.9 (14.3, 27.1) 1.5 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
DeKalb County 6 stable similar 5 19.4 (12.3, 29.4) 1.5 0.8 (-2.2, 4.2)
Lincoln County 4 stable higher 10 19.4 (14.2, 26.1) 1.5 -1.4 (-3.9, 0.9)
Grainger County 6 stable similar 6 19.1 (12.7, 27.8) 1.5 -1.2 (-4.6, 2.5)
Scott County 6 stable similar 5 18.6 (12.2, 27.6) 1.4 -1.8 (-5.3, 1.9)
Putnam County 4 stable higher 18 18.6 (14.8, 23.0) 1.4 0.3 (-1.5, 2.3)
Hawkins County 4 stable higher 16 18.4 (14.3, 23.3) 1.4 -0.8 (-2.7, 1.3)
Hardeman County 8 falling similar 6 18.3 (12.4, 26.3) 1.4 -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Sevier County 4 stable higher 24 18.2 (15.0, 22.0) 1.4 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Claiborne County 6 stable similar 8 18.2 (12.9, 25.2) 1.4 -1.8 (-3.9, 0.4)
Dyer County 6 stable similar 9 18.1 (13.0, 24.7) 1.4 0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Rhea County 6 stable similar 7 18.1 (12.5, 25.4) 1.4 -1.9 (-4.0, 0.3)
Marion County 6 stable similar 7 17.9 (12.4, 25.3) 1.4 -0.2 (-2.7, 2.6)
McMinn County 6 stable similar 13 17.2 (13.1, 22.3) 1.3 -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Montgomery County 4 stable higher 29 17.0 (14.3, 20.1) 1.3 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Hamblen County 6 stable similar 14 16.8 (13.0, 21.4) 1.3 1.0 (-3.5, 11.2)
Stewart County 6 stable similar 3 16.8 (9.6, 27.9) 1.3 -2.1 (-5.0, 0.8)
Macon County 8 falling similar 5 16.7 (10.6, 25.1) 1.3 -2.9 (-5.2, -0.7)
Bedford County 8 falling similar 9 16.6 (12.0, 22.5) 1.3 -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Shelby County 5 falling higher 161 16.4 (15.2, 17.6) 1.3 -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Franklin County 6 stable similar 9 16.4 (11.8, 22.2) 1.3 -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4)
Greene County 6 stable similar 17 16.0 (12.7, 20.1) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Gibson County 8 falling similar 11 15.8 (11.8, 20.9) 1.2 -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
Henry County 8 falling similar 8 15.8 (11.1, 22.1) 1.2 -2.7 (-4.7, -1.0)
Coffee County 8 falling similar 12 15.7 (11.8, 20.5) 1.2 -2.3 (-4.6, -0.1)
Maury County 6 stable similar 19 15.2 (12.2, 18.7) 1.2 -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Anderson County 8 falling similar 16 15.1 (11.9, 19.0) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Roane County 6 stable similar 12 14.9 (11.3, 19.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Carroll County 8 falling similar 6 14.9 (9.9, 21.8) 1.2 -2.5 (-5.4, -0.2)
Cocke County 6 stable similar 9 14.9 (10.6, 20.5) 1.2 -1.9 (-4.0, 0.3)
Davidson County 5 falling higher 99 14.4 (13.1, 15.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Robertson County 6 stable similar 12 14.2 (10.7, 18.4) 1.1 -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Sumner County 6 stable similar 33 14.1 (12.0, 16.5) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.8, 0.3)
Giles County 8 falling similar 7 14.0 (9.5, 20.2) 1.1 -3.0 (-6.0, -0.3)
Rutherford County 8 falling similar 42 14.0 (12.1, 16.1) 1.1 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.4)
Washington County 8 falling similar 24 13.9 (11.5, 16.7) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Monroe County 6 stable similar 10 13.9 (10.2, 18.6) 1.1 -2.0 (-4.6, 0.7)
Campbell County 8 falling similar 8 13.8 (9.7, 19.3) 1.1 -3.1 (-5.6, -1.1)
Carter County 8 falling similar 13 13.7 (10.5, 17.7) 1.1 -2.8 (-4.9, -0.9)
Humphreys County 6 stable similar 4 13.4 (7.8, 22.0) 1.0 -2.2 (-5.3, 0.7)
Cumberland County 6 stable similar 17 13.3 (10.4, 17.1) 1.0 -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Jefferson County 6 stable similar 10 13.2 (9.7, 17.7) 1.0 0.3 (-2.3, 12.5)
White County 6 stable similar 5 13.1 (8.4, 19.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.9, 1.0)
Bradley County 6 stable similar 18 13.0 (10.4, 16.1) 1.0 -1.0 (-3.2, 1.5)
Hamilton County 8 falling similar 62 12.9 (11.4, 14.4) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Blount County 8 falling similar 24 12.5 (10.3, 15.0) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Loudon County 6 stable similar 11 12.4 (9.1, 16.8) 1.0 6.8 (-0.2, 28.0)
Knox County 8 falling similar 70 12.4 (11.1, 13.8) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Lawrence County 6 stable similar 7 12.4 (8.6, 17.3) 1.0 -1.6 (-3.6, 0.3)
Madison County 6 stable similar 15 12.4 (9.7, 15.6) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Wilson County 8 falling similar 22 12.4 (10.1, 15.0) 1.0 -2.3 (-4.2, -0.2)
Sullivan County 8 falling similar 29 12.0 (10.0, 14.3) 0.9 -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Hardin County 6 stable similar 6 11.8 (7.8, 17.7) 0.9 -2.4 (-5.0, 0.1)
Williamson County 6 stable similar 30 11.1 (9.3, 13.1) 0.9 7.5 (-1.0, 18.2)
Chester County
**
** higher 5 22.4 (13.9, 34.2) 1.7
**
Clay County
**
** higher 4 28.5 (16.0, 48.5) 2.2
**
Crockett County
**
** similar 4 22.0 (13.2, 34.7) 1.7
**
Fayette County
**
** similar 10 15.5 (11.4, 20.9) 1.2
**
Grundy County
**
** similar 4 20.6 (12.3, 32.9) 1.6
**
Hickman County
**
** similar 7 19.5 (13.2, 27.9) 1.5
**
Houston County
**
** higher 4 27.2 (15.9, 44.8) 2.1
**
Johnson County
**
** similar 4 16.3 (9.7, 26.2) 1.3
**
Morgan County
**
** similar 3 11.7 (6.7, 19.5) 0.9
**
Smith County
**
** similar 5 18.7 (11.8, 28.5) 1.5
**
Wayne County
**
** similar 4 18.4 (11.5, 28.7) 1.4
**
Bledsoe County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Decatur County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hancock County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lewis County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Meigs County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Moore County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Perry County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pickett County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Trousdale County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Union County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Van Buren County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 9:30 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Bledsoe County, Decatur County, Hancock County, Lake County, Lewis County, Meigs County, Moore County, Perry County, Pickett County, Trousdale County, Union County, Van Buren County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Chester County, Clay County, Crockett County, Fayette County, Grundy County, Hickman County, Houston County, Johnson County, Morgan County, Smith County, Wayne County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top