Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

New York Counties versus United States

Colon & Rectum

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 52,152 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) - -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
New York - falling falling trend - 2,948 11.9 (11.7, 12.1) - -2.9 (-3.2, -2.7)
Lewis County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 18.4 (12.4, 26.6) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Allegany County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 16.9 (12.5, 22.5) 1.3 -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 16.4 (12.8, 20.9) 1.3 -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 16.0 (11.8, 21.2) 1.2 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Essex County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 15.5 (11.2, 21.3) 1.2 -3.2 (-4.7, -1.6)
St. Lawrence County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 15.5 (12.7, 18.9) 1.2 -3.4 (-4.4, -2.3)
Steuben County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 15.3 (12.5, 18.7) 1.2 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Herkimer County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 15.3 (11.7, 19.7) 1.2 -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Fulton County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 14.9 (11.1, 19.8) 1.1 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Sullivan County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 14.8 (11.6, 18.6) 1.1 -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Orleans County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 14.7 (10.4, 20.4) 1.1 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Columbia County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 14.2 (10.8, 18.4) 1.1 -2.9 (-4.0, -1.9)
Livingston County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 14.1 (10.6, 18.7) 1.1 -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 14.0 (10.9, 17.8) 1.1 -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Richmond County 8 falling falling trend similar 82 13.8 (12.4, 15.2) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.4, -2.5)
Chenango County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 13.7 (9.8, 18.7) 1.0 -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Cortland County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 13.7 (9.7, 18.8) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Otsego County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 13.4 (10.1, 17.7) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Cattaraugus County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 13.4 (10.4, 17.1) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 13.2 (10.4, 16.6) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Warren County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 13.1 (10.0, 17.1) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 13.1 (9.9, 17.2) 1.0 -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Saratoga County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 13.1 (11.3, 15.0) 1.0 -3.3 (-4.0, -2.6)
Chautauqua County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 13.0 (10.7, 15.7) 1.0 -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Wyoming County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 12.8 (8.7, 18.3) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.8, -1.3)
Orange County 8 falling falling trend similar 53 12.7 (11.2, 14.4) 1.0 -3.3 (-3.9, -2.7)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 12.7 (10.0, 16.0) 1.0 -3.1 (-4.2, -2.0)
Kings County 8 falling falling trend similar 358 12.7 (12.1, 13.3) 1.0 -3.3 (-3.9, -2.8)
Erie County 8 falling falling trend similar 161 12.7 (11.8, 13.6) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.3, -2.7)
Ulster County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 12.6 (10.6, 14.8) 1.0 -3.4 (-4.0, -2.7)
Bronx County 8 falling falling trend similar 185 12.5 (11.7, 13.3) 1.0 -5.3 (-7.4, -3.2)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 12.5 (11.5, 13.5) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Cayuga County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 12.4 (9.7, 15.8) 0.9 -3.5 (-4.5, -2.5)
Broome County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 12.4 (10.5, 14.6) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Genesee County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 12.4 (9.1, 16.6) 0.9 -2.9 (-4.0, -1.7)
Ontario County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 12.2 (9.9, 15.1) 0.9 -4.0 (-4.8, -3.1)
Oswego County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 12.2 (9.8, 15.2) 0.9 -3.1 (-3.9, -2.2)
Greene County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 12.2 (8.7, 17.0) 0.9 -3.0 (-4.1, -2.0)
Suffolk County 8 falling falling trend similar 235 12.0 (11.3, 12.8) 0.9 -3.8 (-4.0, -3.5)
Onondaga County 8 falling falling trend similar 71 12.0 (10.7, 13.4) 0.9 -2.9 (-3.4, -2.5)
Schoharie County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 11.9 (7.7, 17.9) 0.9 -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Tioga County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 11.9 (8.6, 16.3) 0.9 -3.8 (-5.0, -2.5)
Niagara County 8 falling falling trend similar 35 11.9 (10.1, 13.9) 0.9 -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 11.8 (8.6, 16.2) 0.9 -3.2 (-4.2, -2.1)
Oneida County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 0.9 -3.3 (-3.8, -2.8)
Queens County 9 falling falling trend lower 324 11.5 (10.9, 12.1) 0.9 -2.9 (-3.1, -2.7)
Montgomery County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 11.1 (7.9, 15.4) 0.8 -4.0 (-5.3, -2.6)
Seneca County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 11.1 (7.1, 16.7) 0.8 -3.5 (-5.1, -1.9)
Rockland County 9 falling falling trend lower 44 11.0 (9.6, 12.6) 0.8 -3.7 (-4.3, -3.0)
Nassau County 9 falling falling trend lower 205 10.8 (10.2, 11.5) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Albany County 9 falling falling trend lower 42 10.5 (9.1, 12.1) 0.8 -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Chemung County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 10.5 (7.9, 13.6) 0.8 -3.0 (-3.9, -2.1)
Rensselaer County 9 falling falling trend lower 21 10.4 (8.5, 12.8) 0.8 -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Dutchess County 9 falling falling trend lower 42 10.4 (9.0, 11.9) 0.8 -3.8 (-4.2, -3.4)
Westchester County 9 falling falling trend lower 138 10.2 (9.5, 11.0) 0.8 -3.5 (-3.7, -3.3)
Putnam County 9 falling falling trend lower 14 10.2 (7.9, 13.1) 0.8 -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Yates County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 10.2 (6.1, 16.4) 0.8 -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3)
New York County 9 falling falling trend lower 201 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 0.7 -3.9 (-4.4, -3.5)
Schenectady County 9 falling falling trend lower 19 8.7 (7.0, 10.8) 0.7 -3.5 (-4.2, -2.7)
Tompkins County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 8.4 (6.1, 11.5) 0.6 -4.3 (-5.4, -3.2)
Schuyler County
**
** similar 4 15.0 (8.7, 24.5) 1.1
**
Hamilton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 11:56 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Hamilton County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Schuyler County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top