Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

Colon & Rectum

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 52,152 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) - -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 754 16.3 (15.7, 16.8) - -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 24.8 (17.9, 33.6) 1.9 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
Carter County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 20.0 (15.2, 26.0) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Cherokee County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 23.1 (17.5, 29.8) 1.8 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Creek County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 18.9 (15.1, 23.4) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 3 28.4 (15.9, 47.4) 2.2 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
McCurtain County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 19.6 (13.8, 27.1) 1.5 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Murray County 4 stable stable trend higher 5 24.0 (15.1, 36.6) 1.8 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Nowata County 4 stable stable trend higher 4 24.8 (14.9, 39.9) 1.9 -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Okmulgee County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 18.6 (13.7, 24.8) 1.4 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Payne County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 18.3 (14.1, 23.4) 1.4 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Pontotoc County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 20.2 (14.7, 27.1) 1.5 -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Pottawatomie County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 18.8 (14.9, 23.5) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Sequoyah County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 20.8 (15.6, 27.4) 1.6 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 18.6 (14.1, 24.1) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Muskogee County 5 falling falling trend higher 17 19.5 (15.5, 24.2) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 124 15.1 (13.9, 16.4) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 111 15.5 (14.2, 16.8) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Choctaw County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 21.1 (13.2, 32.7) 1.6 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Delaware County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 15.4 (11.3, 20.8) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Garvin County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 19.8 (13.5, 28.0) 1.5 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Grady County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 16.7 (12.6, 21.8) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 15.1 (9.2, 23.4) 1.2 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Kay County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 18.1 (13.4, 23.9) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Le Flore County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 17.4 (13.2, 22.7) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 18.1 (11.2, 28.2) 1.4 1.6 (-0.5, 3.7)
Mayes County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 15.7 (11.1, 21.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
McClain County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 17.5 (12.4, 23.9) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Pittsburg County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 17.5 (13.1, 23.1) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Pushmataha County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 20.5 (11.4, 34.8) 1.6 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Seminole County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 11.9 (7.0, 19.1) 0.9 -0.5 (-2.5, 1.4)
Stephens County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 16.1 (11.8, 21.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Bryan County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 14.7 (10.6, 20.1) 1.1 -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 13.8 (11.2, 16.9) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 13.9 (12.0, 16.0) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Comanche County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 15.7 (12.6, 19.2) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Craig County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 17.7 (10.5, 28.5) 1.3 -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Custer County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 16.4 (10.5, 24.5) 1.3 -1.8 (-3.4, 0.0)
Garfield County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 15.8 (11.9, 20.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 15.7 (11.1, 21.8) 1.2 -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Logan County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 16.3 (11.8, 22.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 16.5 (12.4, 21.8) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Ottawa County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 17.0 (11.8, 23.8) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Rogers County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 14.8 (11.8, 18.3) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Wagoner County 9 falling falling trend lower 10 9.9 (7.3, 13.2) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Adair County
**
 		** similar 4 15.6 (9.4, 24.4) 1.2
**
Atoka County
**
 		** higher 4 23.5 (14.5, 36.4) 1.8
**
Beckham County
**
 		** similar 5 21.3 (13.7, 31.6) 1.6
**
Kingfisher County
**
 		** similar 4 18.8 (11.0, 30.3) 1.4
**
McIntosh County
**
 		** similar 5 13.5 (8.8, 20.8) 1.0
**
Washita County
**
 		** similar 3 26.3 (14.6, 43.6) 2.0
**
Woodward County
**
 		** similar 4 14.6 (8.5, 23.4) 1.1
**
Alfalfa County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Beaver County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Blaine County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cimarron County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Coal County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cotton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dewey County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ellis County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greer County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harmon County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harper County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Haskell County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hughes County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jefferson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Johnston County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Latimer County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Love County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Major County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Noble County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Okfuskee County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pawnee County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Roger Mills County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Texas County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tillman County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Woods County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/05/2024 4:03 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alfalfa County, Beaver County, Blaine County, Cimarron County, Coal County, Cotton County, Dewey County, Ellis County, Grant County, Greer County, Harmon County, Harper County, Haskell County, Hughes County, Jefferson County, Johnston County, Latimer County, Love County, Major County, Noble County, Okfuskee County, Pawnee County, Roger Mills County, Texas County, Tillman County, Woods County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Adair County, Atoka County, Beckham County, Kingfisher County, McIntosh County, Washita County, Woodward County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top