Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Wisconsin Counties versus United States

Colon & Rectum

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate ascending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 52,152 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) - -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Wisconsin - falling falling trend - 901 12.1 (11.8, 12.5) - -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Langlade County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 19.2 (12.8, 28.3) 1.5 -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Oneida County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 18.9 (13.8, 25.6) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 16.9 (12.4, 22.7) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Ashland County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 16.2 (9.7, 26.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Grant County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 16.2 (12.1, 21.5) 1.2 -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 16.0 (11.7, 21.6) 1.2 -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Vilas County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 15.9 (10.1, 24.4) 1.2 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 15.7 (11.1, 22.2) 1.2 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Crawford County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 15.4 (9.1, 25.1) 1.2 -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Barron County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 15.4 (11.5, 20.3) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Juneau County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 15.2 (10.1, 22.3) 1.2 -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Oconto County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 14.9 (10.7, 20.6) 1.1 -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 14.9 (10.9, 20.1) 1.1 -20.1 (-35.1, -1.6)
Sauk County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 14.9 (11.4, 19.1) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Waupaca County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 14.7 (11.1, 19.4) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Milwaukee County 5 falling falling trend higher 149 14.6 (13.6, 15.7) 1.1 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 14.3 (8.6, 23.1) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Clark County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 14.3 (9.7, 20.4) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 13.9 (8.6, 21.8) 1.1 -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Wood County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 13.9 (10.8, 17.6) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Sawyer County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 13.8 (8.1, 22.9) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Shawano County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 13.8 (9.8, 19.0) 1.0 -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Trempealeau County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 13.3 (8.7, 19.7) 1.0 -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
St. Croix County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 13.1 (10.0, 16.8) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Dodge County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 13.0 (10.2, 16.4) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Portage County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 12.8 (9.5, 17.0) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Outagamie County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 12.7 (10.6, 15.0) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Racine County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 12.6 (10.7, 14.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Kenosha County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 12.1 (10.0, 14.6) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Columbia County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 12.0 (8.6, 16.4) 0.9 -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Chippewa County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 11.9 (8.8, 15.8) 0.9 -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Walworth County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 11.9 (9.4, 14.9) 0.9 -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Fond du Lac County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) 0.9 -3.5 (-4.4, -2.7)
Rock County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 11.4 (9.4, 13.8) 0.9 -23.4 (-43.8, 4.5)
Vernon County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 11.2 (7.1, 17.2) 0.9 -3.6 (-5.4, -1.9)
Sheboygan County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 11.2 (8.9, 13.9) 0.9 -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 11.1 (9.0, 13.6) 0.8 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Green County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 11.0 (7.4, 16.1) 0.8 -5.9 (-8.3, -3.4)
Ozaukee County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 11.0 (8.6, 13.9) 0.8 -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
La Crosse County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 10.9 (8.5, 13.8) 0.8 -3.4 (-4.3, -2.4)
Manitowoc County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 10.9 (8.3, 14.1) 0.8 -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Eau Claire County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 10.7 (8.2, 13.8) 0.8 -3.2 (-4.2, -2.3)
Marinette County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 10.6 (7.4, 15.1) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Winnebago County 9 falling falling trend lower 22 10.4 (8.5, 12.6) 0.8 -2.4 (-3.3, -1.6)
Brown County 9 falling falling trend lower 31 10.3 (8.8, 12.1) 0.8 -3.1 (-3.7, -2.5)
Dunn County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 9.9 (6.5, 14.7) 0.8 -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Waukesha County 9 falling falling trend lower 57 9.8 (8.7, 11.1) 0.7 -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Jefferson County 9 falling falling trend lower 10 9.4 (7.0, 12.5) 0.7 -3.8 (-4.8, -2.9)
Waushara County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 9.4 (5.3, 16.0) 0.7 -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Marathon County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 9.1 (7.2, 11.4) 0.7 -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Dane County 9 falling falling trend lower 52 9.0 (8.0, 10.2) 0.7 -3.2 (-3.9, -2.4)
Door County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 7.8 (5.0, 12.6) 0.6 -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Burnett County
**
 		** similar 5 16.8 (10.9, 26.4) 1.3
**
Calumet County
**
 		** lower 5 9.3 (6.0, 13.7) 0.7
**
Forest County
**
 		** similar 3 19.5 (11.1, 33.9) 1.5
**
Iowa County
**
 		** similar 3 9.1 (5.1, 15.5) 0.7
**
Kewaunee County
**
 		** similar 4 14.7 (8.6, 23.6) 1.1
**
Pierce County
**
 		** similar 7 14.4 (9.8, 20.4) 1.1
**
Taylor County
**
 		** similar 4 11.3 (6.6, 18.8) 0.9
**
Washburn County
**
 		** higher 6 23.6 (15.7, 35.0) 1.8
**
Bayfield County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Buffalo County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Florence County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Green Lake County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iron County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lafayette County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Marquette County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Menominee County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pepin County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Price County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Richland County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rusk County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 2:38 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Bayfield County, Buffalo County, Florence County, Green Lake County, Iron County, Lafayette County, Marquette County, Menominee County, Pepin County, Price County, Richland County, Rusk County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Burnett County, Calumet County, Forest County, Iowa County, Kewaunee County, Pierce County, Taylor County, Washburn County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top