Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Alabama Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 134,732 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) - -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Alabama - falling - 2,655 39.1 (38.4, 39.8) - -3.7 (-4.2, -3.3)
Jefferson County 5 falling higher 302 36.2 (34.4, 38.1) 1.1 -4.5 (-7.7, -2.6)
Mobile County 5 falling higher 212 39.4 (37.0, 41.9) 1.3 -4.3 (-6.2, -3.4)
Madison County 8 falling similar 150 31.1 (28.9, 33.5) 1.0 -5.6 (-10.8, -3.7)
Baldwin County 8 falling similar 130 34.3 (31.7, 37.1) 1.1 -5.1 (-13.5, -2.5)
Montgomery County 8 falling similar 89 32.2 (29.3, 35.5) 1.0 -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Tuscaloosa County 8 falling similar 81 32.1 (29.0, 35.5) 1.0 -4.8 (-10.6, -3.7)
Calhoun County 5 falling higher 78 48.9 (44.1, 54.2) 1.6 -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Shelby County 9 falling lower 74 26.2 (23.5, 29.0) 0.8 -5.0 (-11.1, -3.9)
Morgan County 5 falling higher 72 42.3 (38.0, 47.0) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Etowah County 5 falling higher 69 45.7 (40.9, 50.9) 1.4 -4.7 (-7.4, -3.3)
Marshall County 5 falling higher 63 47.7 (42.5, 53.5) 1.5 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Lee County 8 falling similar 62 34.3 (30.5, 38.4) 1.1 -6.6 (-19.7, -3.3)
Houston County 5 falling higher 59 39.4 (35.0, 44.3) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
St. Clair County 5 falling higher 58 45.7 (40.5, 51.4) 1.4 -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Talladega County 5 falling higher 56 46.9 (41.4, 52.9) 1.5 -3.8 (-11.8, -1.6)
Cullman County 5 falling higher 54 42.1 (37.1, 47.6) 1.3 -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Lauderdale County 5 falling higher 53 37.6 (33.1, 42.6) 1.2 -4.0 (-7.7, -2.7)
Elmore County 5 falling higher 50 44.4 (39.0, 50.5) 1.4 -3.6 (-8.5, -2.3)
Walker County 5 falling higher 50 52.0 (45.5, 59.1) 1.6 -7.0 (-17.4, -3.0)
Jackson County 5 falling higher 44 53.5 (46.4, 61.4) 1.7 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Limestone County 8 falling similar 44 31.7 (27.5, 36.3) 1.0 -4.8 (-6.6, -3.7)
DeKalb County 5 falling higher 40 41.0 (35.4, 47.2) 1.3 -3.2 (-8.3, -1.7)
Blount County 5 falling higher 39 45.9 (39.6, 53.0) 1.5 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Colbert County 5 falling higher 38 43.5 (37.5, 50.4) 1.4 -11.9 (-21.2, -1.1)
Autauga County 5 falling higher 33 43.8 (37.3, 51.2) 1.4 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Dale County 5 falling higher 32 47.2 (40.0, 55.4) 1.5 -3.4 (-7.9, -2.4)
Russell County 5 falling higher 32 45.1 (38.2, 52.9) 1.4 -2.1 (-3.5, -0.9)
Chilton County 5 falling higher 29 48.1 (40.5, 57.0) 1.5 -3.1 (-7.7, -2.1)
Covington County 5 falling higher 29 46.0 (38.6, 54.6) 1.5 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Tallapoosa County 5 falling higher 28 41.2 (34.6, 49.1) 1.3 -2.3 (-3.9, -1.0)
Lawrence County 5 falling higher 26 52.3 (43.5, 62.5) 1.7 -2.8 (-15.8, -1.0)
Coffee County 8 falling similar 26 35.9 (29.9, 42.8) 1.1 -10.5 (-21.3, -3.5)
Escambia County 5 falling higher 25 48.0 (39.8, 57.6) 1.5 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.8)
Cherokee County 4 stable higher 25 57.5 (47.6, 69.4) 1.8 -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Geneva County 4 stable higher 23 57.5 (47.3, 69.6) 1.8 -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Franklin County 4 stable higher 23 56.0 (46.2, 67.5) 1.8 -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Marion County 5 falling higher 23 49.0 (40.3, 59.3) 1.6 -2.4 (-3.8, -1.1)
Chambers County 8 falling similar 20 38.9 (31.5, 47.7) 1.2 -2.5 (-4.3, -0.8)
Barbour County 5 falling higher 19 51.7 (41.8, 63.6) 1.6 -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Dallas County 8 falling similar 19 33.9 (27.2, 41.8) 1.1 -16.1 (-27.8, -7.4)
Pike County 4 stable higher 17 45.0 (35.8, 55.9) 1.4 -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Randolph County 4 stable higher 16 47.1 (37.1, 59.3) 1.5 -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Winston County 5 falling higher 16 42.6 (33.6, 53.6) 1.4 -4.7 (-13.5, -3.0)
Clarke County 5 falling higher 16 44.0 (34.9, 55.3) 1.4 -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Henry County 4 stable higher 15 49.1 (38.3, 62.6) 1.6 -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Bibb County 5 falling higher 14 45.8 (35.5, 58.6) 1.5 -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Monroe County 6 stable similar 12 38.2 (29.1, 49.9) 1.2 -1.5 (-3.7, 0.8)
Butler County 6 stable similar 12 40.9 (31.1, 53.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-3.4, 1.2)
Fayette County 4 stable higher 12 44.7 (34.0, 58.4) 1.4 -1.1 (-3.1, 0.7)
Clay County 5 falling higher 11 48.8 (36.8, 64.1) 1.5 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Cleburne County 5 falling higher 11 47.4 (35.7, 62.3) 1.5 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Lamar County 5 falling higher 11 46.5 (34.5, 61.9) 1.5 -2.3 (-4.1, -0.6)
Macon County 8 falling similar 11 35.9 (26.8, 47.9) 1.1 -10.7 (-18.5, -6.8)
Hale County 6 stable similar 10 43.9 (32.3, 59.0) 1.4 -1.8 (-4.8, 1.0)
Pickens County 8 falling similar 10 34.2 (25.2, 46.0) 1.1 -2.7 (-5.1, -0.7)
Marengo County 8 falling similar 9 31.6 (22.8, 43.2) 1.0 -2.6 (-4.4, -1.1)
Choctaw County 6 stable similar 9 38.2 (27.7, 52.5) 1.2 -2.4 (-5.1, 0.1)
Coosa County 5 falling higher 9 46.2 (32.9, 64.5) 1.5 -2.5 (-4.9, -0.4)
Crenshaw County 8 falling similar 9 43.0 (31.0, 58.9) 1.4 -27.9 (-48.2, -0.4)
Conecuh County 8 falling similar 7 33.8 (23.8, 47.9) 1.1 -2.7 (-5.6, 0.0)
Lowndes County 6 stable similar 7 41.2 (28.2, 59.3) 1.3 -2.0 (-4.6, 0.4)
Washington County 8 falling similar 6 28.1 (19.0, 40.7) 0.9 -9.5 (-31.4, -3.3)
Sumter County 6 stable similar 6 33.6 (22.1, 49.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-4.8, 1.7)
Greene County 6 stable similar 6 45.1 (29.6, 67.3) 1.4 -0.9 (-3.7, 1.9)
Wilcox County 8 falling similar 6 34.9 (23.0, 51.7) 1.1 -5.7 (-18.5, -2.3)
Bullock County 6 stable similar 5 35.1 (22.7, 52.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-3.6, 2.6)
Perry County 6 stable similar 4 30.8 (18.6, 49.3) 1.0 -3.0 (-6.8, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 1:08 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top