Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Tennessee Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 134,732 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) - -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Tennessee - falling - 3,938 43.6 (43.0, 44.2) - -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Shelby County 5 falling higher 370 35.9 (34.3, 37.7) 1.1 -4.6 (-7.1, -3.4)
Davidson County 8 falling similar 234 33.4 (31.4, 35.4) 1.1 -6.7 (-10.6, -4.9)
Knox County 5 falling higher 232 38.9 (36.7, 41.3) 1.2 -3.8 (-6.1, -3.1)
Hamilton County 5 falling higher 178 35.5 (33.1, 37.9) 1.1 -3.5 (-7.4, -2.9)
Sullivan County 5 falling higher 127 48.7 (44.9, 52.8) 1.5 -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Rutherford County 5 falling higher 120 39.5 (36.3, 42.9) 1.3 -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Sumner County 5 falling higher 102 40.7 (37.2, 44.5) 1.3 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Blount County 5 falling higher 91 41.6 (37.8, 45.8) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Montgomery County 5 falling higher 81 45.0 (40.6, 49.8) 1.4 -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Washington County 5 falling higher 77 39.7 (35.8, 44.0) 1.3 -6.0 (-11.6, -3.2)
Wilson County 5 falling higher 75 39.7 (35.7, 44.1) 1.3 -3.5 (-7.0, -2.4)
Bradley County 5 falling higher 69 47.1 (42.1, 52.4) 1.5 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Sevier County 5 falling higher 64 43.0 (38.3, 48.2) 1.4 -9.7 (-16.8, -4.5)
Greene County 5 falling higher 60 50.7 (45.0, 57.0) 1.6 -3.3 (-7.3, -2.3)
Williamson County 9 falling lower 59 21.5 (19.1, 24.2) 0.7 -4.9 (-6.2, -3.7)
Madison County 5 falling higher 56 42.3 (37.3, 47.7) 1.3 -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Anderson County 5 falling higher 56 46.5 (41.1, 52.6) 1.5 -3.5 (-13.4, -1.9)
Maury County 5 falling higher 52 37.9 (33.4, 43.0) 1.2 -7.5 (-15.4, -4.0)
Hawkins County 4 stable higher 52 55.5 (48.8, 62.9) 1.8 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Cumberland County 5 falling higher 51 37.5 (32.8, 42.9) 1.2 -6.2 (-17.3, -2.9)
Putnam County 5 falling higher 50 49.3 (43.3, 56.0) 1.6 -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Gibson County 5 falling higher 45 65.9 (57.4, 75.2) 2.1 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Robertson County 5 falling higher 45 50.8 (44.1, 58.2) 1.6 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
McMinn County 5 falling higher 45 54.7 (47.7, 62.6) 1.7 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Carter County 5 falling higher 44 47.7 (41.5, 54.9) 1.5 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Hamblen County 5 falling higher 44 49.7 (43.3, 56.9) 1.6 -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Campbell County 5 falling higher 43 69.7 (60.6, 80.0) 2.2 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Jefferson County 5 falling higher 43 49.3 (42.8, 56.6) 1.6 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Coffee County 5 falling higher 43 54.8 (47.6, 62.9) 1.7 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Loudon County 5 falling higher 43 39.3 (34.0, 45.3) 1.2 -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Monroe County 5 falling higher 43 57.4 (49.7, 66.2) 1.8 -4.7 (-13.8, -1.5)
Tipton County 5 falling higher 42 57.4 (49.6, 66.0) 1.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Roane County 5 falling higher 42 44.4 (38.5, 51.2) 1.4 -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Dickson County 5 falling higher 39 54.7 (47.1, 63.4) 1.7 -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Cocke County 5 falling higher 35 57.9 (49.3, 67.8) 1.8 -3.8 (-14.6, -1.3)
Bedford County 5 falling higher 34 57.1 (48.6, 66.6) 1.8 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Claiborne County 5 falling higher 32 63.5 (53.8, 74.8) 2.0 -2.4 (-3.7, -1.3)
Rhea County 4 stable higher 30 64.2 (54.2, 75.8) 2.0 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Henry County 5 falling higher 30 54.0 (45.5, 64.1) 1.7 -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Dyer County 4 stable higher 30 58.8 (49.6, 69.4) 1.9 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Lawrence County 5 falling higher 30 48.6 (41.0, 57.4) 1.5 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Warren County 5 falling higher 30 52.1 (43.9, 61.5) 1.7 -2.6 (-16.7, -0.5)
Obion County 5 falling higher 29 60.2 (50.6, 71.4) 1.9 -1.9 (-7.3, -0.7)
Cheatham County 5 falling higher 29 55.1 (45.9, 65.6) 1.7 -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Franklin County 5 falling higher 27 42.3 (35.4, 50.4) 1.3 -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Marshall County 5 falling higher 26 55.6 (46.1, 66.6) 1.8 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Weakley County 5 falling higher 25 54.5 (45.2, 65.4) 1.7 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Grainger County 5 falling higher 24 65.3 (53.9, 78.9) 2.1 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Hardin County 5 falling higher 24 52.9 (43.5, 64.2) 1.7 -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Hickman County 4 stable higher 24 67.0 (55.2, 80.7) 2.1 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Carroll County 5 falling higher 24 54.7 (45.2, 66.0) 1.7 -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Giles County 5 falling higher 24 48.8 (40.2, 59.0) 1.5 -2.4 (-3.9, -1.0)
Henderson County 5 falling higher 24 57.3 (47.3, 69.1) 1.8 -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Overton County 4 stable higher 24 67.0 (55.2, 81.0) 2.1 -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Marion County 5 falling higher 23 52.2 (43.0, 63.1) 1.7 -2.0 (-3.9, -0.2)
Lincoln County 5 falling higher 23 42.2 (34.6, 51.2) 1.3 -3.2 (-4.6, -2.0)
McNairy County 4 stable higher 22 55.0 (45.1, 66.7) 1.7 -4.0 (-6.8, 0.0)
White County 5 falling higher 21 50.4 (41.1, 61.3) 1.6 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Macon County 4 stable higher 21 66.5 (54.2, 80.9) 2.1 -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Lauderdale County 4 stable higher 21 62.8 (51.1, 76.7) 2.0 -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Union County 4 stable higher 21 70.9 (57.4, 86.9) 2.2 -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Fayette County 8 falling similar 20 28.0 (22.7, 34.4) 0.9 -5.0 (-11.1, -3.5)
Hardeman County 4 stable higher 20 56.3 (45.5, 69.1) 1.8 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
DeKalb County 4 stable higher 19 63.2 (51.0, 77.9) 2.0 -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Fentress County 5 falling higher 18 57.3 (45.8, 71.4) 1.8 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Humphreys County 5 falling higher 17 55.2 (43.8, 69.1) 1.8 -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Scott County 5 falling higher 16 55.2 (43.7, 69.1) 1.8 -12.1 (-23.1, -5.4)
Morgan County 5 falling higher 16 53.3 (41.9, 67.1) 1.7 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Polk County 5 falling higher 16 56.5 (44.4, 71.3) 1.8 -5.6 (-15.4, -2.7)
Benton County 4 stable higher 16 58.8 (45.9, 74.8) 1.9 -0.5 (-3.1, 1.9)
Johnson County 4 stable higher 15 49.1 (38.3, 62.7) 1.6 -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Smith County 4 stable higher 15 53.1 (41.3, 67.4) 1.7 -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Unicoi County 4 stable higher 15 48.3 (37.7, 61.5) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.2)
Lewis County 4 stable higher 14 70.2 (54.6, 89.7) 2.2 -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Wayne County 4 stable higher 14 56.8 (44.0, 72.7) 1.8 -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Crockett County 4 stable higher 13 65.5 (50.3, 84.3) 2.1 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0)
Jackson County 4 stable higher 13 60.3 (46.3, 78.5) 1.9 -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Chester County 4 stable higher 12 52.9 (40.4, 68.5) 1.7 -0.3 (-2.4, 2.1)
Haywood County 5 falling higher 12 43.2 (32.7, 56.6) 1.4 -3.1 (-5.2, -1.3)
Decatur County 4 stable higher 12 60.7 (45.9, 79.7) 1.9 -1.3 (-3.8, 1.1)
Grundy County 4 stable higher 12 55.4 (41.9, 72.5) 1.8 -2.0 (-4.5, 0.5)
Meigs County 4 stable higher 11 51.0 (37.9, 68.1) 1.6 -1.6 (-3.9, 0.9)
Stewart County 5 falling higher 11 50.9 (37.8, 67.6) 1.6 -3.2 (-5.5, -1.2)
Sequatchie County 8 falling similar 10 40.5 (29.9, 54.3) 1.3 -9.8 (-18.0, -5.9)
Trousdale County 4 stable higher 10 83.3 (61.3, 110.9) 2.6 -1.6 (-4.6, 1.3)
Bledsoe County 8 falling similar 9 40.1 (29.2, 54.5) 1.3 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.1)
Cannon County 4 stable higher 9 48.5 (35.4, 65.3) 1.5 -1.9 (-4.1, 0.2)
Houston County 4 stable higher 9 66.4 (48.0, 90.7) 2.1 -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Clay County 5 falling higher 7 50.1 (34.9, 71.8) 1.6 -2.2 (-4.6, 0.0)
Perry County 4 stable higher 7 53.7 (37.3, 76.0) 1.7 -1.5 (-4.4, 1.2)
Hancock County 4 stable higher 6 53.3 (35.3, 79.0) 1.7 -1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)
Pickett County 4 stable higher 6 56.6 (38.3, 85.1) 1.8 -1.0 (-4.3, 2.6)
Van Buren County 6 stable similar 6 52.2 (33.4, 79.5) 1.7 0.7 (-2.8, 4.9)
Lake County 5 falling higher 5 59.2 (38.4, 88.5) 1.9 -3.7 (-5.8, -2.0)
Moore County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 3:14 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Moore County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top