Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Minnesota Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Minnesota - falling falling trend - 2,223 31.9 (31.3, 32.5) - -4.8 (-5.7, -4.0)
Yellow Medicine County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.6 (24.2, 54.4) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Wright County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 36.5 (32.1, 41.4) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Winona County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 33.5 (27.4, 40.8) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Wilkin County
**
** higher 6 65.9 (44.3, 95.9) 1.9
**
Watonwan County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.9 (24.6, 54.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Washington County 9 falling falling trend lower 86 28.8 (26.1, 31.8) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Waseca County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 24.3 (16.4, 35.1) 0.7 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Wadena County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 43.4 (31.8, 58.6) 1.2 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Wabasha County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 30.4 (22.8, 40.3) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Traverse County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Todd County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 27.4 (20.4, 36.6) 0.8 -5.4 (-7.2, -3.6)
Swift County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 34.1 (22.3, 51.3) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Stevens County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Steele County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 29.2 (22.8, 37.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Stearns County 9 falling falling trend lower 59 31.2 (27.7, 35.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
St. Louis County 5 falling falling trend higher 116 39.5 (36.2, 42.9) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Sibley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 25.3 (16.4, 37.7) 0.7 -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Sherburne County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 32.0 (26.8, 37.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Scott County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 30.8 (26.6, 35.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Roseau County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 30.2 (20.5, 43.4) 0.9 -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Rock County
**
** similar 4 27.5 (16.5, 44.3) 0.8
**
Rice County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 32.6 (27.2, 38.9) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Renville County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 30.4 (21.1, 43.3) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Redwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 27.0 (18.5, 38.9) 0.8 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Red Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ramsey County 9 falling falling trend lower 192 31.0 (29.0, 33.1) 0.9 -3.8 (-4.5, -3.0)
Pope County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 24.8 (15.8, 38.5) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.1)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 38.2 (30.3, 47.7) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Pipestone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.7 (24.0, 55.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Pine County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 39.4 (31.7, 48.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Pennington County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 41.0 (29.3, 56.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Otter Tail County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 31.7 (26.8, 37.5) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Olmsted County 9 falling falling trend lower 48 25.3 (22.2, 28.8) 0.7 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Norman County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 57.3 (38.5, 83.8) 1.6 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Nobles County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 32.4 (23.3, 44.0) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Nicollet County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 30.3 (23.3, 39.0) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Murray County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 26.1 (15.3, 43.4) 0.7 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Mower County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 39.1 (32.0, 47.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Morrison County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 40.0 (32.3, 49.2) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Mille Lacs County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 38.2 (29.7, 48.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Meeker County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 33.5 (25.5, 43.7) 1.0 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
McLeod County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 30.6 (24.1, 38.4) 0.9 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Martin County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 41.4 (31.5, 54.0) 1.2 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 27.8 (17.6, 43.4) 0.8 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Mahnomen County 1 rising rising trend higher 5 68.3 (44.3, 102.1) 2.0 2.2 (0.4, 4.0)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 34.6 (25.9, 45.3) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 40.0 (24.1, 65.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Le Sueur County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 35.5 (27.5, 45.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Lake of the Woods County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 31.7 (22.1, 45.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Lac qui Parle County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Koochiching County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 33.3 (23.1, 47.8) 1.0 -6.5 (-10.5, -2.4)
Kittson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kandiyohi County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 30.6 (24.5, 37.9) 0.9 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Kanabec County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 43.8 (33.0, 57.6) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Jackson County 7 stable stable trend lower 4 23.0 (13.7, 37.6) 0.7 -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Itasca County 5 falling falling trend higher 32 43.4 (36.7, 51.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Isanti County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 43.3 (35.4, 52.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Hubbard County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 36.4 (28.1, 47.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Houston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 28.1 (19.9, 39.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Hennepin County 9 falling falling trend lower 385 27.5 (26.2, 28.7) 0.8 -3.7 (-4.3, -3.1)
Grant County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Goodhue County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 33.5 (27.7, 40.4) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Freeborn County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 35.7 (28.6, 44.5) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 32.6 (23.9, 43.9) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Faribault County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 32.3 (22.9, 45.3) 0.9 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 34.2 (28.0, 41.7) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Dodge County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 25.6 (17.4, 36.5) 0.7 -15.9 (-28.9, -0.5)
Dakota County 9 falling falling trend lower 141 29.6 (27.4, 31.9) 0.8 -5.9 (-8.2, -3.5)
Crow Wing County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 35.1 (30.3, 40.6) 1.0 -5.0 (-7.7, -2.2)
Cottonwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 31.7 (20.9, 46.9) 0.9 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Cook County
**
** similar 3 35.7 (19.3, 63.6) 1.0
**
Clearwater County
**
** similar 6 42.7 (28.8, 62.4) 1.2
**
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 37.8 (31.3, 45.1) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Chisago County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 40.5 (34.0, 48.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Chippewa County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 42.5 (29.9, 59.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Cass County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 47.7 (39.2, 57.9) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Carver County 7 stable stable trend lower 24 24.2 (20.0, 29.1) 0.7 -11.8 (-22.6, 0.4)
Carlton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 33.2 (26.3, 41.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 32.2 (24.7, 41.7) 0.9 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Blue Earth County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 31.5 (25.8, 38.1) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Big Stone County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 35.6 (28.0, 44.6) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Beltrami County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 34.6 (27.9, 42.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Becker County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 33.5 (26.9, 41.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Anoka County 8 falling falling trend similar 146 36.9 (34.2, 39.8) 1.1 -13.3 (-22.3, -3.3)
Aitkin County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 49.6 (39.1, 63.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/28/2024 6:48 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Big Stone County, Grant County, Kittson County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake of the Woods County, Red Lake County, Stevens County, Traverse County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Clearwater County, Cook County, Rock County, Wilkin County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top