Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 134,732 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) - -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Oklahoma - falling - 2,162 43.9 (43.0, 44.7) - -3.3 (-4.3, -2.7)
Canadian County 8 falling similar 57 33.3 (29.5, 37.5) 1.1 -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Cleveland County 8 falling similar 112 34.0 (31.2, 37.0) 1.1 -3.5 (-6.2, -2.6)
Craig County 8 falling similar 9 41.0 (29.7, 55.7) 1.3 -11.4 (-27.7, -4.1)
Custer County 8 falling similar 11 36.8 (27.7, 47.9) 1.2 -7.9 (-27.0, -1.9)
Jackson County 8 falling similar 12 39.2 (29.7, 50.8) 1.2 -3.4 (-17.0, -1.9)
Kingfisher County 8 falling similar 7 34.2 (23.5, 48.3) 1.1 -2.3 (-4.6, -0.3)
Latimer County 8 falling similar 7 41.5 (28.5, 59.5) 1.3 -3.1 (-5.0, -1.4)
Logan County 8 falling similar 23 35.4 (29.1, 42.7) 1.1 -14.9 (-23.4, -5.9)
Osage County 8 falling similar 27 36.0 (30.0, 43.0) 1.1 -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Tillman County 8 falling similar 3 30.2 (17.5, 50.4) 1.0 -8.2 (-15.3, -5.8)
Wagoner County 8 falling similar 40 36.1 (31.1, 41.6) 1.1 -6.9 (-18.1, -3.1)
Woodward County 8 falling similar 10 37.8 (27.9, 50.4) 1.2 -2.2 (-4.2, -0.2)
Alfalfa County 6 stable similar 4 50.5 (31.1, 79.6) 1.6 -0.7 (-4.2, 2.5)
Blaine County 6 stable similar 6 44.7 (30.1, 65.2) 1.4 -2.0 (-5.0, 0.5)
Major County 6 stable similar 4 34.5 (20.3, 55.8) 1.1 -0.9 (-3.5, 1.6)
Texas County 6 stable similar 6 29.2 (19.5, 42.1) 0.9 -2.5 (-5.3, 0.1)
Washita County 6 stable similar 5 31.5 (20.0, 47.9) 1.0 -2.0 (-4.9, 0.5)
Woods County 6 stable similar 5 40.9 (25.6, 62.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-3.4, 3.2)
Caddo County 5 falling higher 20 60.7 (49.3, 74.1) 1.9 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Carter County 5 falling higher 31 49.2 (41.7, 57.8) 1.6 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Choctaw County 5 falling higher 12 56.9 (43.1, 74.3) 1.8 -4.1 (-17.8, -2.2)
Comanche County 5 falling higher 59 45.4 (40.3, 51.0) 1.4 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Creek County 5 falling higher 54 53.3 (47.1, 60.3) 1.7 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Delaware County 5 falling higher 31 41.7 (35.1, 49.3) 1.3 -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Garfield County 5 falling higher 32 40.3 (34.1, 47.2) 1.3 -2.1 (-3.3, -1.1)
Grady County 5 falling higher 36 49.2 (42.1, 57.2) 1.6 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Kay County 5 falling higher 34 53.8 (45.9, 62.8) 1.7 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Le Flore County 5 falling higher 37 55.2 (47.4, 64.1) 1.8 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.3)
Lincoln County 5 falling higher 24 46.5 (38.4, 56.0) 1.5 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Mayes County 5 falling higher 28 52.1 (43.6, 61.9) 1.7 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
McClain County 5 falling higher 21 41.8 (34.1, 50.8) 1.3 -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Muskogee County 5 falling higher 49 55.5 (48.6, 63.1) 1.8 -3.0 (-11.1, -1.5)
Oklahoma County 5 falling higher 349 40.4 (38.4, 42.3) 1.3 -4.0 (-6.7, -2.8)
Payne County 5 falling higher 33 41.2 (35.0, 48.1) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Pittsburg County 5 falling higher 36 55.4 (47.6, 64.4) 1.8 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Pontotoc County 5 falling higher 22 42.7 (34.9, 51.7) 1.4 -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Pushmataha County 5 falling higher 12 65.8 (50.3, 85.6) 2.1 -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Rogers County 5 falling higher 53 41.9 (36.9, 47.4) 1.3 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Sequoyah County 5 falling higher 38 67.1 (57.8, 77.7) 2.1 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Stephens County 5 falling higher 30 45.5 (38.3, 53.8) 1.4 -2.6 (-4.0, -1.4)
Tulsa County 5 falling higher 281 36.6 (34.7, 38.6) 1.2 -2.9 (-3.3, -2.5)
Adair County 4 stable higher 17 69.2 (55.0, 86.1) 2.2 12.4 (-1.0, 21.2)
Atoka County 4 stable higher 12 59.3 (45.1, 77.1) 1.9 0.7 (-1.8, 3.6)
Beckham County 4 stable higher 13 50.7 (39.0, 65.1) 1.6 -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Bryan County 4 stable higher 30 48.8 (41.2, 57.5) 1.5 -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Cherokee County 4 stable higher 35 54.3 (46.3, 63.3) 1.7 -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Coal County 4 stable higher 5 66.1 (42.8, 99.3) 2.1 -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Cotton County 4 stable higher 5 59.3 (38.6, 89.4) 1.9 -0.3 (-2.8, 2.3)
Garvin County 4 stable higher 18 50.7 (40.5, 62.9) 1.6 -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Haskell County 4 stable higher 13 70.9 (54.4, 91.7) 2.3 -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Hughes County 4 stable higher 11 58.3 (43.6, 76.7) 1.8 -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Jefferson County 4 stable higher 5 61.0 (39.5, 92.1) 1.9 -1.9 (-4.6, 0.4)
Johnston County 4 stable higher 8 59.1 (42.1, 81.3) 1.9 -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Kiowa County 4 stable higher 8 63.2 (44.1, 88.5) 2.0 -0.1 (-2.2, 1.9)
Love County 4 stable higher 8 57.0 (40.6, 78.6) 1.8 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Marshall County 4 stable higher 15 57.1 (44.9, 72.4) 1.8 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
McCurtain County 4 stable higher 29 69.9 (58.7, 82.8) 2.2 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
McIntosh County 4 stable higher 22 63.2 (51.7, 77.2) 2.0 -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Murray County 4 stable higher 15 68.5 (53.4, 87.1) 2.2 -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
Noble County 4 stable higher 8 48.2 (34.5, 66.5) 1.5 -1.3 (-4.1, 1.4)
Nowata County 4 stable higher 8 54.2 (38.4, 75.2) 1.7 -0.9 (-3.4, 1.6)
Okfuskee County 4 stable higher 9 57.4 (42.1, 77.2) 1.8 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Okmulgee County 4 stable higher 30 59.0 (49.8, 69.6) 1.9 -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Ottawa County 4 stable higher 29 71.1 (59.8, 84.1) 2.3 -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Pawnee County 4 stable higher 13 54.5 (41.8, 70.3) 1.7 -0.1 (-2.2, 8.9)
Pottawatomie County 4 stable higher 52 55.4 (48.7, 62.8) 1.8 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Seminole County 4 stable higher 19 57.0 (46.0, 70.1) 1.8 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Washington County 4 stable higher 37 47.4 (40.7, 55.0) 1.5 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Ellis County
**
** similar 3 49.6 (27.7, 85.6) 1.6
**
Roger Mills County
**
** similar 3 55.5 (31.6, 94.8) 1.8
**
Beaver County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cimarron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dewey County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greer County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harmon County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 1:24 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Beaver County, Cimarron County, Dewey County, Grant County, Greer County, Harmon County, Harper County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Ellis County, Roger Mills County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top