Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

South Carolina Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling - 134,732 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) - -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
South Carolina - falling - 2,624 36.5 (35.8, 37.1) - -3.9 (-4.4, -3.5)
Beaufort County 9 falling lower 90 24.4 (22.1, 26.9) 0.8 -3.7 (-4.4, -2.8)
Aiken County 8 falling similar 91 34.6 (31.4, 38.1) 1.1 -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Charleston County 8 falling similar 156 28.7 (26.7, 30.9) 0.9 -8.4 (-14.8, -3.6)
Dorchester County 8 falling similar 64 34.6 (30.8, 38.7) 1.1 -11.2 (-17.1, -4.0)
Edgefield County 8 falling similar 14 34.8 (26.8, 44.7) 1.1 -3.3 (-5.0, -1.7)
Georgetown County 8 falling similar 43 33.0 (28.5, 38.2) 1.0 -4.5 (-8.3, -3.2)
Greenville County 8 falling similar 193 28.9 (27.1, 30.8) 0.9 -5.2 (-7.3, -4.1)
Hampton County 8 falling similar 11 41.5 (31.3, 54.4) 1.3 -31.0 (-48.8, -2.0)
McCormick County 8 falling similar 8 31.3 (21.6, 47.6) 1.0 -3.5 (-5.8, -1.3)
Oconee County 8 falling similar 50 35.8 (31.4, 40.8) 1.1 -4.3 (-6.5, -1.0)
Orangeburg County 8 falling similar 42 33.9 (29.3, 39.1) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Pickens County 8 falling similar 60 34.5 (30.7, 38.8) 1.1 -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Saluda County 8 falling similar 10 32.8 (24.1, 44.1) 1.0 -3.3 (-12.3, -1.3)
Williamsburg County 8 falling similar 20 39.0 (31.6, 48.1) 1.2 -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Allendale County 6 stable similar 5 43.9 (28.3, 66.6) 1.4 -0.2 (-3.3, 2.7)
Bamberg County 6 stable similar 9 42.2 (30.5, 57.7) 1.3 -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Barnwell County 6 stable similar 11 37.4 (28.0, 49.3) 1.2 -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Calhoun County 6 stable similar 9 35.7 (25.7, 49.2) 1.1 -1.9 (-4.0, 0.4)
Jasper County 6 stable similar 18 36.8 (29.1, 46.2) 1.2 -2.1 (-4.3, 0.4)
Abbeville County 5 falling higher 17 42.4 (33.5, 53.3) 1.3 -17.3 (-30.8, -0.8)
Anderson County 5 falling higher 111 38.7 (35.5, 42.2) 1.2 -3.8 (-4.8, -3.2)
Berkeley County 5 falling higher 91 35.0 (31.7, 38.5) 1.1 -7.1 (-10.6, -5.2)
Cherokee County 5 falling higher 38 50.2 (43.2, 58.1) 1.6 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Chesterfield County 5 falling higher 36 57.2 (48.9, 66.7) 1.8 -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Clarendon County 5 falling higher 25 47.6 (39.2, 57.6) 1.5 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Colleton County 5 falling higher 31 53.9 (45.6, 63.6) 1.7 -2.9 (-15.4, -0.6)
Darlington County 5 falling higher 38 42.2 (36.2, 48.9) 1.3 -2.7 (-3.7, -1.8)
Fairfield County 5 falling higher 16 44.6 (35.0, 56.6) 1.4 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Florence County 5 falling higher 74 40.2 (36.1, 44.7) 1.3 -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Greenwood County 5 falling higher 40 39.5 (34.1, 45.6) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Horry County 5 falling higher 247 38.2 (36.0, 40.6) 1.2 -5.6 (-8.7, -3.9)
Kershaw County 5 falling higher 49 51.3 (44.9, 58.5) 1.6 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Lancaster County 5 falling higher 57 37.3 (33.0, 42.1) 1.2 -2.8 (-3.9, -1.6)
Laurens County 5 falling higher 46 46.7 (40.8, 53.4) 1.5 -6.8 (-15.4, -1.7)
Lexington County 5 falling higher 147 38.4 (35.6, 41.3) 1.2 -2.5 (-3.1, -1.8)
Marion County 5 falling higher 22 50.9 (41.5, 62.1) 1.6 -2.2 (-4.4, -0.1)
Marlboro County 5 falling higher 22 57.7 (47.1, 70.2) 1.8 -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Newberry County 5 falling higher 26 43.7 (36.3, 52.3) 1.4 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Richland County 5 falling higher 154 35.0 (32.5, 37.6) 1.1 -3.0 (-3.4, -2.5)
Spartanburg County 5 falling higher 162 38.1 (35.5, 40.9) 1.2 -3.4 (-6.5, -2.8)
Sumter County 5 falling higher 60 44.0 (39.1, 49.4) 1.4 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
York County 5 falling higher 121 36.4 (33.5, 39.5) 1.2 -4.3 (-8.0, -3.3)
Chester County 4 stable higher 29 63.4 (53.2, 75.2) 2.0 -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Dillon County 4 stable higher 25 65.3 (53.9, 78.5) 2.1 -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Lee County 4 stable higher 13 56.9 (43.4, 73.7) 1.8 13.8 (-2.8, 26.4)
Union County 4 stable higher 25 56.9 (47.1, 68.6) 1.8 -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 3:49 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top