Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

Oregon Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by trend

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling - 134,732 31.5 (31.4, 31.6) - -3.7 (-3.9, -3.5)
Oregon - falling - 1,754 30.2 (29.6, 30.9) - -4.3 (-4.7, -4.0)
Linn County 5 falling higher 79 42.7 (38.5, 47.3) 1.4 -9.1 (-15.3, -2.1)
Clackamas County 9 falling lower 153 25.5 (23.7, 27.5) 0.8 -5.4 (-9.4, -4.1)
Clatsop County 6 stable similar 20 28.7 (23.1, 35.5) 0.9 -5.4 (-9.3, 1.6)
Multnomah County 9 falling lower 242 28.0 (26.4, 29.6) 0.9 -5.3 (-7.8, -4.3)
Marion County 8 falling similar 135 31.5 (29.1, 34.0) 1.0 -5.2 (-11.0, -3.4)
Deschutes County 9 falling lower 68 22.8 (20.4, 25.4) 0.7 -4.5 (-5.4, -3.6)
Hood River County 9 falling lower 6 20.7 (14.0, 29.6) 0.7 -4.2 (-6.2, -2.4)
Douglas County 5 falling higher 86 42.0 (37.9, 46.4) 1.3 -4.0 (-8.7, -2.5)
Union County 9 falling lower 9 21.2 (15.3, 28.9) 0.7 -3.6 (-6.3, -1.1)
Washington County 9 falling lower 146 22.6 (21.0, 24.4) 0.7 -3.6 (-4.1, -3.0)
Benton County 9 falling lower 29 23.2 (19.5, 27.5) 0.7 -3.5 (-5.6, -1.7)
Columbia County 5 falling higher 32 38.4 (32.5, 45.2) 1.2 -3.3 (-4.5, -2.2)
Jackson County 8 falling similar 104 28.7 (26.2, 31.4) 0.9 -3.2 (-3.9, -2.5)
Lane County 8 falling similar 185 32.6 (30.5, 34.9) 1.0 -3.1 (-3.7, -2.6)
Yamhill County 8 falling similar 44 30.0 (26.1, 34.4) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Crook County 8 falling similar 16 34.5 (27.1, 43.9) 1.1 -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Lincoln County 5 falling higher 41 39.0 (33.4, 45.6) 1.2 -2.9 (-4.2, -1.8)
Lake County 6 stable similar 4 26.4 (16.0, 43.1) 0.8 -2.8 (-5.8, 0.0)
Josephine County 5 falling higher 69 40.9 (36.5, 45.9) 1.3 -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Coos County 5 falling higher 54 42.7 (37.5, 48.6) 1.4 -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Wasco County 5 falling higher 18 42.3 (33.7, 52.7) 1.3 -2.6 (-4.7, -0.7)
Curry County 5 falling higher 22 39.2 (32.0, 48.6) 1.2 -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Grant County 6 stable similar 5 31.2 (20.2, 49.3) 1.0 -2.3 (-4.7, 0.1)
Polk County 8 falling similar 35 29.4 (25.1, 34.2) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Umatilla County 8 falling similar 35 35.6 (30.5, 41.4) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Klamath County 5 falling higher 42 38.7 (33.5, 44.6) 1.2 -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Malheur County 8 falling similar 14 34.1 (26.4, 43.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-3.7, 0.0)
Tillamook County 8 falling similar 21 39.0 (31.5, 48.2) 1.2 -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County 6 stable similar 11 34.7 (25.8, 45.9) 1.1 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.6)
Baker County 4 stable higher 14 44.2 (34.0, 57.2) 1.4 -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Harney County
**
** similar 4 30.9 (18.8, 49.9) 1.0
**
Morrow County
**
** similar 5 34.5 (22.3, 51.5) 1.1
**
Wallowa County
**
** similar 4 26.3 (15.4, 44.6) 0.8
**
Gilliam County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sherman County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wheeler County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 6:52 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Gilliam County, Sherman County, Wheeler County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Harney County, Morrow County, Wallowa County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top