Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
California - falling falling trend - 11,097 25.2 (24.9, 25.4) - -5.6 (-6.0, -5.2)
Lake County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 44.0 (38.3, 50.3) 1.3 -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Yuba County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 47.0 (40.1, 54.6) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Amador County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 36.0 (30.2, 43.0) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Butte County 8 falling falling trend similar 114 37.0 (34.0, 40.3) 1.1 -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
Calaveras County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 35.5 (30.1, 42.0) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Colusa County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 27.9 (19.2, 39.3) 0.8 -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Del Norte County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 41.6 (32.7, 52.4) 1.2 -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Glenn County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 39.6 (30.6, 50.6) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Humboldt County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 35.0 (31.2, 39.2) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Kings County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 31.9 (27.6, 36.8) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Lassen County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 30.1 (22.2, 40.0) 0.9 -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Mariposa County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 28.6 (20.4, 39.9) 0.8 -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 76 31.5 (28.4, 34.9) 0.9 -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
Modoc County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 26.5 (16.5, 42.4) 0.8 -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Plumas County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 36.3 (27.9, 47.4) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Shasta County 8 falling falling trend similar 106 38.0 (34.8, 41.5) 1.1 -3.9 (-5.2, -2.6)
Siskiyou County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 39.2 (33.0, 46.4) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Solano County 8 falling falling trend similar 174 32.6 (30.5, 34.9) 0.9 -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Stanislaus County 8 falling falling trend similar 187 33.2 (31.1, 35.5) 1.0 -3.4 (-4.2, -2.7)
Sutter County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 31.9 (27.5, 36.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Tehama County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 36.9 (31.6, 42.9) 1.1 -4.1 (-5.4, -2.9)
Trinity County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 35.4 (25.6, 49.2) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Tuolumne County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 33.5 (28.5, 39.3) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Alameda County 9 falling falling trend lower 428 23.6 (22.6, 24.7) 0.7 -4.2 (-4.6, -3.7)
Contra Costa County 9 falling falling trend lower 347 24.8 (23.6, 26.0) 0.7 -6.3 (-8.1, -4.4)
El Dorado County 9 falling falling trend lower 72 24.1 (21.6, 26.8) 0.7 -9.5 (-13.9, -4.7)
Fresno County 9 falling falling trend lower 250 26.3 (24.8, 27.8) 0.8 -9.4 (-16.3, -2.0)
Imperial County 9 falling falling trend lower 34 18.8 (16.1, 21.9) 0.5 -4.2 (-4.9, -3.4)
Inyo County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 24.0 (17.0, 33.9) 0.7 -2.9 (-4.2, -1.5)
Kern County 9 falling falling trend lower 241 30.9 (29.1, 32.7) 0.9 -3.7 (-4.4, -3.0)
Los Angeles County 9 falling falling trend lower 2,507 23.0 (22.6, 23.5) 0.7 -4.3 (-4.8, -3.8)
Madera County 9 falling falling trend lower 47 28.3 (24.8, 32.2) 0.8 -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Marin County 9 falling falling trend lower 80 18.5 (16.7, 20.5) 0.5 -5.1 (-6.4, -3.8)
Mendocino County 9 falling falling trend lower 41 29.3 (25.2, 33.9) 0.8 -3.1 (-3.6, -2.5)
Monterey County 9 falling falling trend lower 100 22.0 (20.0, 24.0) 0.6 -3.9 (-4.7, -3.2)
Napa County 9 falling falling trend lower 51 25.1 (22.0, 28.4) 0.7 -6.1 (-7.8, -4.4)
Nevada County 9 falling falling trend lower 46 24.5 (21.3, 28.2) 0.7 -3.2 (-3.8, -2.6)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 860 23.3 (22.6, 24.0) 0.7 -4.7 (-5.6, -3.8)
Placer County 9 falling falling trend lower 143 24.7 (22.9, 26.6) 0.7 -4.4 (-5.0, -3.8)
Riverside County 9 falling falling trend lower 739 27.0 (26.1, 27.9) 0.8 -3.9 (-4.3, -3.5)
Sacramento County 9 falling falling trend lower 506 29.8 (28.6, 31.0) 0.9 -5.3 (-6.4, -4.3)
San Benito County 9 falling falling trend lower 17 27.3 (21.6, 33.9) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
San Bernardino County 9 falling falling trend lower 554 27.8 (26.7, 28.9) 0.8 -4.0 (-4.5, -3.5)
San Diego County 9 falling falling trend lower 905 24.8 (24.1, 25.6) 0.7 -5.7 (-6.7, -4.8)
San Francisco County 9 falling falling trend lower 258 23.5 (22.2, 24.9) 0.7 -6.5 (-8.9, -4.1)
San Joaquin County 9 falling falling trend lower 218 28.7 (26.9, 30.4) 0.8 -6.6 (-7.7, -5.5)
San Luis Obispo County 9 falling falling trend lower 110 26.4 (24.2, 28.7) 0.8 -4.3 (-5.4, -3.1)
San Mateo County 9 falling falling trend lower 197 20.3 (19.0, 21.6) 0.6 -5.5 (-6.5, -4.4)
Santa Barbara County 9 falling falling trend lower 117 21.9 (20.1, 23.8) 0.6 -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 424 20.3 (19.4, 21.2) 0.6 -7.9 (-10.9, -4.8)
Santa Cruz County 9 falling falling trend lower 71 21.6 (19.4, 24.1) 0.6 -4.5 (-6.1, -3.0)
Sonoma County 9 falling falling trend lower 195 27.0 (25.3, 28.8) 0.8 -4.7 (-5.7, -3.6)
Tulare County 9 falling falling trend lower 116 27.5 (25.2, 29.8) 0.8 -5.1 (-6.6, -3.5)
Ventura County 9 falling falling trend lower 235 22.8 (21.5, 24.2) 0.7 -3.9 (-4.4, -3.4)
Yolo County 9 falling falling trend lower 54 25.7 (22.7, 29.0) 0.7 -3.3 (-4.0, -2.7)
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 4:00 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Mono County, Sierra County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top