Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Illinois Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Illinois - falling falling trend - 5,840 37.3 (36.9, 37.8) - -4.8 (-5.4, -4.2)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 38.6 (33.2, 44.7) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Alexander County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 60.8 (40.4, 90.1) 1.7 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Bond County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 43.4 (32.3, 57.7) 1.2 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 34.6 (28.5, 41.8) 1.0 -10.4 (-17.7, -2.3)
Brown County
**
** similar 4 56.8 (35.0, 88.0) 1.6
**
Bureau County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 46.6 (38.8, 55.9) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Calhoun County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Carroll County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 35.1 (24.7, 49.1) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Cass County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 59.8 (43.8, 80.1) 1.7 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Champaign County 9 falling falling trend lower 64 30.4 (27.1, 33.9) 0.9 -3.5 (-4.4, -2.6)
Christian County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 52.0 (43.2, 62.2) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Clark County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 40.6 (29.7, 54.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 52.9 (39.2, 70.5) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 39.6 (32.1, 48.5) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Coles County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 42.0 (35.1, 50.0) 1.2 -4.1 (-6.8, -1.4)
Cook County 8 falling falling trend similar 1,970 33.0 (32.3, 33.6) 0.9 -5.6 (-6.9, -4.3)
Crawford County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 55.7 (44.0, 70.1) 1.6 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Cumberland County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 35.6 (23.7, 52.4) 1.0 -1.8 (-3.5, 0.1)
De Witt County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 60.9 (47.2, 77.9) 1.7 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
DeKalb County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 40.3 (35.0, 46.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 43.6 (32.9, 56.9) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
DuPage County 9 falling falling trend lower 318 28.5 (27.1, 30.0) 0.8 -4.5 (-5.6, -3.3)
Edgar County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 41.8 (31.8, 54.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Edwards County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 54.4 (35.5, 81.4) 1.6 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Effingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 34.6 (27.3, 43.4) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Fayette County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 50.3 (39.5, 63.3) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Ford County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 54.6 (40.4, 72.8) 1.6 -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 49.8 (42.1, 58.8) 1.4 -11.5 (-21.2, -0.7)
Fulton County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 55.4 (46.7, 65.5) 1.6 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Gallatin County 5 falling falling trend higher 5 67.0 (43.4, 101.2) 1.9 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Greene County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 43.4 (31.2, 59.6) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Grundy County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 48.6 (40.7, 57.6) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 47.2 (31.9, 68.8) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 40.5 (30.8, 53.0) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Hardin County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 49.0 (28.5, 83.9) 1.4 -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Henderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 43.1 (28.5, 65.5) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Henry County 4 stable stable trend higher 34 43.8 (37.3, 51.2) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Iroquois County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 51.5 (42.4, 62.3) 1.5 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 29 44.1 (37.0, 52.2) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Jasper County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 27.3 (16.8, 43.2) 0.8 -17.7 (-34.5, 3.5)
Jefferson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 46.7 (38.8, 56.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Jersey County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 49.2 (39.0, 61.7) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Jo Daviess County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 32.4 (25.3, 41.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 41.0 (28.8, 57.5) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Kane County 9 falling falling trend lower 177 30.9 (28.9, 33.1) 0.9 -5.2 (-7.5, -2.8)
Kankakee County 5 falling falling trend higher 76 54.9 (49.4, 60.8) 1.6 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Kendall County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 33.5 (28.5, 39.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Knox County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 49.6 (42.7, 57.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
La Salle County 4 stable stable trend higher 84 52.7 (47.6, 58.1) 1.5 -7.7 (-21.9, 9.1)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 251 31.9 (30.1, 33.8) 0.9 -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 58.5 (44.7, 75.6) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lee County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 48.9 (40.6, 58.5) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Livingston County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 48.8 (40.4, 58.6) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 49.7 (40.4, 60.7) 1.4 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Macon County 5 falling falling trend higher 81 51.3 (46.3, 56.7) 1.5 -2.9 (-4.7, -1.2)
Macoupin County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 51.7 (44.4, 60.1) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 174 48.3 (45.1, 51.7) 1.4 -4.9 (-8.8, -0.9)
Marion County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 59.4 (50.5, 69.6) 1.7 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 45.3 (33.0, 61.7) 1.3 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.3)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 72.8 (57.5, 91.6) 2.1 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Massac County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 51.9 (39.3, 67.9) 1.5 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
McDonough County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 43.9 (35.0, 54.7) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
McHenry County 8 falling falling trend similar 125 35.4 (32.6, 38.4) 1.0 -5.4 (-6.7, -4.1)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 68 38.1 (34.1, 42.4) 1.1 -3.0 (-4.3, -1.6)
Menard County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 44.0 (31.1, 61.0) 1.3 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Mercer County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 52.4 (40.6, 67.3) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 28.2 (21.7, 36.2) 0.8 -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 23 52.5 (43.2, 63.5) 1.5 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 47.1 (38.8, 56.8) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Moultrie County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 49.3 (36.5, 65.5) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Ogle County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 41.3 (34.9, 48.6) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Peoria County 5 falling falling trend higher 111 46.9 (43.0, 51.1) 1.3 -3.7 (-5.6, -1.7)
Perry County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 49.5 (38.5, 62.9) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Piatt County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 38.0 (27.5, 51.8) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 56.5 (43.9, 72.2) 1.6 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Pope County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pulaski County 4 stable stable trend higher 5 63.0 (41.2, 94.3) 1.8 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Putnam County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 55.6 (36.9, 83.3) 1.6 -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Randolph County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 50.1 (41.3, 60.4) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Richland County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 48.6 (36.6, 63.8) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Rock Island County 5 falling falling trend higher 89 43.1 (39.1, 47.4) 1.2 -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Saline County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 55.1 (44.7, 67.5) 1.6 -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Sangamon County 5 falling falling trend higher 106 39.5 (36.1, 43.1) 1.1 -8.1 (-12.3, -3.6)
Schuyler County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 59.5 (40.9, 85.6) 1.7 -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Scott County
**
** similar 4 47.7 (28.2, 78.1) 1.4
**
Shelby County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 41.9 (32.7, 53.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
St. Clair County 5 falling falling trend higher 151 46.2 (42.8, 49.7) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Stark County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 40.7 (23.6, 67.8) 1.2 -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Stephenson County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 36.0 (30.1, 42.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Tazewell County 5 falling falling trend higher 90 47.0 (42.7, 51.7) 1.3 -5.4 (-10.2, -0.4)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 51.4 (39.7, 66.1) 1.5 -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Vermilion County 5 falling falling trend higher 66 59.2 (52.9, 66.2) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Wabash County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 40.3 (27.9, 57.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Warren County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 52.2 (40.0, 67.4) 1.5 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 34.7 (24.4, 48.6) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 43.2 (32.3, 57.0) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
White County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 49.7 (37.5, 65.6) 1.4 -19.7 (-41.1, 9.5)
Whiteside County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 42.4 (36.4, 49.2) 1.2 -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Will County 5 falling falling trend higher 284 39.6 (37.5, 41.7) 1.1 -3.6 (-4.9, -2.3)
Williamson County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 47.7 (41.6, 54.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Winnebago County 5 falling falling trend higher 163 42.5 (39.5, 45.5) 1.2 -4.6 (-6.7, -2.6)
Woodford County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 40.7 (33.2, 49.4) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 12:04 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Calhoun County, Pope County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Brown County, Scott County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top