Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2018-2022

Indiana Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rate

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - fallingfalling - 136,831 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) - -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Indiana - fallingfalling - 3,595 42.1 (41.5, 42.8) - -3.6 (-4.7, -2.7)
Hamilton County 9 fallingfalling lower 84 24.2 (21.9, 26.7) 0.7 -4.1 (-8.5, -3.2)
Dubois County 8 fallingfalling similar 16 27.6 (21.8, 34.6) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Tipton County 8 fallingfalling similar 8 30.8 (21.6, 43.4) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Posey County 8 fallingfalling similar 12 31.9 (24.1, 41.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Boone County 8 fallingfalling similar 26 33.4 (27.8, 39.9) 1.0 -6.1 (-16.0, -2.4)
Lake County 8 fallingfalling similar 228 34.6 (32.6, 36.7) 1.1 -4.4 (-5.6, -3.5)
Elkhart County 8 fallingfalling similar 88 35.6 (32.3, 39.1) 1.1 -3.3 (-6.8, -2.0)
Adams County 6 stablestable similar 16 35.7 (28.2, 44.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Marshall County 8 fallingfalling similar 22 35.8 (29.4, 43.4) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Monroe County 8 fallingfalling similar 54 36.3 (32.0, 41.1) 1.1 -2.6 (-4.5, -1.8)
Hendricks County 5 fallingfalling higher 71 36.3 (32.6, 40.4) 1.1 -5.4 (-11.4, -2.5)
Spencer County 8 fallingfalling similar 11 36.6 (27.6, 48.2) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Allen County 5 fallingfalling higher 165 36.7 (34.2, 39.3) 1.1 -2.1 (-5.4, -1.7)
Warren County 8 fallingfalling similar 5 37.0 (23.8, 56.4) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Steuben County 8 fallingfalling similar 20 37.2 (30.0, 45.8) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Gibson County 8 fallingfalling similar 17 37.8 (30.0, 47.3) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.7)
Ripley County 8 fallingfalling similar 16 38.2 (30.1, 48.0) 1.2 -8.4 (-23.6, -2.0)
Franklin County 6 stablestable similar 13 39.1 (30.0, 50.5) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.6)
Tippecanoe County 5 fallingfalling higher 67 39.4 (35.3, 44.0) 1.2 -2.4 (-7.4, -1.8)
Jay County 8 fallingfalling similar 12 39.6 (30.0, 51.7) 1.2 -4.2 (-13.3, -1.3)
Porter County 5 fallingfalling higher 91 39.9 (36.2, 43.9) 1.2 -9.3 (-15.1, -1.6)
Wells County 8 fallingfalling similar 16 40.2 (31.6, 50.6) 1.2 -1.5 (-9.7, -0.4)
St. Joseph County 5 fallingfalling higher 139 40.4 (37.4, 43.6) 1.2 -1.9 (-3.2, -1.4)
Hancock County 4 stablestable higher 43 40.9 (35.6, 46.9) 1.3 -4.9 (-12.1, 0.3)
Johnson County 5 fallingfalling higher 79 41.0 (37.0, 45.4) 1.3 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Montgomery County 5 fallingfalling higher 22 41.2 (33.8, 49.9) 1.3 -2.8 (-9.9, -1.0)
Bartholomew County 5 fallingfalling higher 43 41.2 (35.8, 47.2) 1.3 -4.0 (-10.8, -1.8)
Warrick County 5 fallingfalling higher 37 41.2 (35.4, 47.8) 1.3 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Kosciusko County 5 fallingfalling higher 44 41.2 (35.9, 47.3) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Vanderburgh County 5 fallingfalling higher 100 41.6 (37.9, 45.5) 1.3 -3.5 (-7.0, -2.4)
Daviess County 5 fallingfalling higher 17 41.9 (33.3, 52.1) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
LaPorte County 5 fallingfalling higher 67 42.1 (37.6, 47.1) 1.3 -4.7 (-12.3, -1.6)
DeKalb County 5 fallingfalling higher 25 42.5 (35.2, 51.1) 1.3 -16.8 (-29.9, -1.2)
Wabash County 5 fallingfalling higher 22 42.6 (34.8, 51.9) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Jackson County 5 fallingfalling higher 26 42.6 (35.5, 50.8) 1.3 -6.9 (-19.4, -2.1)
Carroll County 6 stablestable similar 13 43.0 (33.0, 55.6) 1.3 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
LaGrange County 4 stablestable higher 18 43.1 (34.6, 53.1) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.6)
Clinton County 4 stablestable higher 18 43.2 (34.6, 53.4) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Union County 6 stablestable similar 5 43.4 (27.5, 66.9) 1.3 -0.3 (-2.7, 2.4)
Marion County 5 fallingfalling higher 443 44.3 (42.4, 46.2) 1.4 -3.3 (-4.3, -2.7)
Huntington County 5 fallingfalling higher 23 44.5 (36.6, 53.8) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Parke County 5 fallingfalling higher 11 44.8 (33.5, 59.3) 1.4 -3.8 (-17.1, -1.3)
Decatur County 4 stablestable higher 16 45.3 (35.8, 56.8) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8)
Vigo County 5 fallingfalling higher 63 45.4 (40.4, 50.8) 1.4 -2.6 (-7.2, -1.6)
Clay County 5 fallingfalling higher 17 45.5 (36.1, 56.7) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Jasper County 5 fallingfalling higher 22 45.9 (37.6, 55.8) 1.4 -4.5 (-16.2, -1.6)
Shelby County 4 stablestable higher 30 46.0 (38.8, 54.3) 1.4 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2)
Pulaski County 4 stablestable higher 9 46.2 (33.8, 62.7) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Harrison County 5 fallingfalling higher 26 46.4 (38.6, 55.4) 1.4 -5.6 (-19.6, -0.5)
Floyd County 5 fallingfalling higher 49 46.6 (40.8, 53.0) 1.4 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Cass County 5 fallingfalling higher 24 46.6 (38.6, 56.0) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Noble County 5 fallingfalling higher 28 46.6 (39.0, 55.5) 1.4 -2.2 (-10.1, -0.8)
Howard County 5 fallingfalling higher 58 46.7 (41.4, 52.5) 1.4 -2.0 (-3.4, -1.5)
Miami County 5 fallingfalling higher 23 46.9 (38.6, 56.7) 1.4 -3.2 (-10.8, -1.6)
Wayne County 5 fallingfalling higher 46 47.4 (41.4, 54.1) 1.5 -3.7 (-5.8, -2.4)
Owen County 5 fallingfalling higher 16 47.7 (37.5, 60.3) 1.5 -3.7 (-15.2, -1.6)
Morgan County 5 fallingfalling higher 48 47.7 (41.7, 54.5) 1.5 -1.9 (-4.2, -1.4)
Perry County 4 stablestable higher 13 47.8 (36.6, 61.8) 1.5 -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Rush County 4 stablestable higher 12 47.9 (36.4, 62.3) 1.5 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
White County 5 fallingfalling higher 18 47.9 (38.4, 59.5) 1.5 -3.1 (-11.0, -1.3)
Crawford County 5 fallingfalling higher 9 48.0 (34.5, 66.4) 1.5 -23.4 (-42.5, -0.6)
Brown County 4 stablestable higher 14 48.5 (37.3, 63.0) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.2, 0.4)
Whitley County 4 stablestable higher 24 48.8 (40.3, 58.8) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Sullivan County 5 fallingfalling higher 14 49.2 (38.2, 62.7) 1.5 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Jefferson County 4 stablestable higher 24 49.5 (40.8, 59.7) 1.5 -16.7 (-32.2, 0.5)
Pike County 4 stablestable higher 9 49.6 (36.1, 67.1) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Lawrence County 5 fallingfalling higher 34 49.6 (42.3, 57.9) 1.5 -1.9 (-8.2, -0.8)
Ohio County 8 fallingfalling similar 5 49.6 (32.5, 75.2) 1.5 -2.4 (-8.1, -0.4)
Madison County 5 fallingfalling higher 91 49.8 (45.2, 54.6) 1.5 -4.0 (-9.5, -1.7)
Fayette County 5 fallingfalling higher 18 49.9 (39.9, 62.0) 1.5 -2.6 (-11.6, -0.6)
Knox County 5 fallingfalling higher 25 50.6 (42.0, 60.6) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Clark County 5 fallingfalling higher 78 50.6 (45.6, 56.0) 1.6 -2.7 (-3.9, -2.1)
Randolph County 4 stablestable higher 19 51.1 (41.2, 63.0) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Blackford County 4 stablestable higher 10 51.1 (37.9, 68.4) 1.6 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Delaware County 5 fallingfalling higher 76 51.3 (46.2, 56.9) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Dearborn County 5 fallingfalling higher 37 52.0 (44.7, 60.4) 1.6 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Grant County 5 fallingfalling higher 51 53.5 (47.0, 60.8) 1.7 -1.4 (-6.7, -0.7)
Fulton County 4 stablestable higher 16 53.5 (42.3, 67.2) 1.7 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Starke County 5 fallingfalling higher 20 54.8 (44.3, 67.5) 1.7 -17.6 (-33.5, -1.3)
Orange County 4 stablestable higher 16 55.1 (43.4, 69.3) 1.7 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Henry County 4 stablestable higher 41 57.3 (49.7, 65.9) 1.8 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Putnam County 4 stablestable higher 29 58.2 (49.1, 68.7) 1.8 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Fountain County 5 fallingfalling higher 15 58.2 (45.7, 73.7) 1.8 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Newton County 4 stablestable higher 13 58.5 (44.9, 75.6) 1.8 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Greene County 4 stablestable higher 27 58.8 (49.1, 70.1) 1.8 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Vermillion County 4 stablestable higher 13 59.5 (45.7, 76.6) 1.8 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Washington County 4 stablestable higher 23 59.6 (49.0, 72.0) 1.8 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Switzerland County 4 stablestable higher 8 60.6 (43.2, 83.4) 1.9 -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Benton County 5 fallingfalling higher 8 62.7 (44.4, 87.0) 1.9 -2.6 (-13.3, -0.2)
Martin County 4 stablestable higher 10 63.1 (46.3, 84.9) 1.9 0.3 (-0.8, 1.6)
Jennings County 4 stablestable higher 23 65.5 (53.9, 79.0) 2.0 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Scott County 5 fallingfalling higher 24 72.9 (60.3, 87.7) 2.2 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2025 8:23 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 5.3.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top