Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Minnesota Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Minnesota - falling falling trend - 2,223 31.9 (31.3, 32.5) - -4.8 (-5.7, -4.0)
Hennepin County 9 falling falling trend lower 385 27.5 (26.2, 28.7) 0.8 -3.7 (-4.3, -3.1)
Ramsey County 9 falling falling trend lower 192 31.0 (29.0, 33.1) 0.9 -3.8 (-4.5, -3.0)
Anoka County 8 falling falling trend similar 146 36.9 (34.2, 39.8) 1.1 -13.3 (-22.3, -3.3)
Dakota County 9 falling falling trend lower 141 29.6 (27.4, 31.9) 0.8 -5.9 (-8.2, -3.5)
St. Louis County 5 falling falling trend higher 116 39.5 (36.2, 42.9) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Washington County 9 falling falling trend lower 86 28.8 (26.1, 31.8) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Stearns County 9 falling falling trend lower 59 31.2 (27.7, 35.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Wright County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 36.5 (32.1, 41.4) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Olmsted County 9 falling falling trend lower 48 25.3 (22.2, 28.8) 0.7 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Scott County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 30.8 (26.6, 35.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Crow Wing County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 35.1 (30.3, 40.6) 1.0 -5.0 (-7.7, -2.2)
Itasca County 5 falling falling trend higher 32 43.4 (36.7, 51.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Otter Tail County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 31.7 (26.8, 37.5) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Sherburne County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 32.0 (26.8, 37.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Chisago County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 40.5 (34.0, 48.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Rice County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 32.6 (27.2, 38.9) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 37.8 (31.3, 45.1) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Cass County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 47.7 (39.2, 57.9) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Goodhue County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 33.5 (27.7, 40.4) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Carver County 7 stable stable trend lower 24 24.2 (20.0, 29.1) 0.7 -11.8 (-22.6, 0.4)
Blue Earth County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 31.5 (25.8, 38.1) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 34.2 (28.0, 41.7) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Mower County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 39.1 (32.0, 47.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Isanti County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 43.3 (35.4, 52.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Winona County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 33.5 (27.4, 40.8) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Morrison County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 40.0 (32.3, 49.2) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Beltrami County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 34.6 (27.9, 42.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Pine County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 39.4 (31.7, 48.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Becker County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 33.5 (26.9, 41.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Kandiyohi County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 30.6 (24.5, 37.9) 0.9 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Freeborn County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 35.7 (28.6, 44.5) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Aitkin County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 49.6 (39.1, 63.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 38.2 (30.3, 47.7) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Carlton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 33.2 (26.3, 41.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 35.6 (28.0, 44.6) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
McLeod County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 30.6 (24.1, 38.4) 0.9 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Steele County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 29.2 (22.8, 37.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Hubbard County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 36.4 (28.1, 47.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Mille Lacs County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 38.2 (29.7, 48.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Le Sueur County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 35.5 (27.5, 45.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Martin County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 41.4 (31.5, 54.0) 1.2 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 32.2 (24.7, 41.7) 0.9 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Nicollet County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 30.3 (23.3, 39.0) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Meeker County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 33.5 (25.5, 43.7) 1.0 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Kanabec County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 43.8 (33.0, 57.6) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 34.6 (25.9, 45.3) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Wabasha County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 30.4 (22.8, 40.3) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Todd County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 27.4 (20.4, 36.6) 0.8 -5.4 (-7.2, -3.6)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 32.6 (23.9, 43.9) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Wadena County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 43.4 (31.8, 58.6) 1.2 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Nobles County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 32.4 (23.3, 44.0) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Pennington County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 41.0 (29.3, 56.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Houston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 28.1 (19.9, 39.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Chippewa County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 42.5 (29.9, 59.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Faribault County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 32.3 (22.9, 45.3) 0.9 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Koochiching County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 33.3 (23.1, 47.8) 1.0 -6.5 (-10.5, -2.4)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 31.7 (22.1, 45.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Renville County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 30.4 (21.1, 43.3) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Redwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 27.0 (18.5, 38.9) 0.8 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Dodge County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 25.6 (17.4, 36.5) 0.7 -15.9 (-28.9, -0.5)
Roseau County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 30.2 (20.5, 43.4) 0.9 -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Norman County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 57.3 (38.5, 83.8) 1.6 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Waseca County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 24.3 (16.4, 35.1) 0.7 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Watonwan County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.9 (24.6, 54.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Yellow Medicine County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.6 (24.2, 54.4) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Cottonwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 31.7 (20.9, 46.9) 0.9 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Pipestone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.7 (24.0, 55.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Sibley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 25.3 (16.4, 37.7) 0.7 -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Swift County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 34.1 (22.3, 51.3) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Mahnomen County 1 rising rising trend higher 5 68.3 (44.3, 102.1) 2.0 2.2 (0.4, 4.0)
Pope County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 24.8 (15.8, 38.5) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.1)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 27.8 (17.6, 43.4) 0.8 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 40.0 (24.1, 65.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Jackson County 7 stable stable trend lower 4 23.0 (13.7, 37.6) 0.7 -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Murray County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 26.1 (15.3, 43.4) 0.7 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Clearwater County
**
 		** similar 6 42.7 (28.8, 62.4) 1.2
**
Cook County
**
 		** similar 3 35.7 (19.3, 63.6) 1.0
**
Rock County
**
 		** similar 4 27.5 (16.5, 44.3) 0.8
**
Wilkin County
**
 		** higher 6 65.9 (44.3, 95.9) 1.9
**
Big Stone County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kittson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lac qui Parle County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake of the Woods County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Red Lake County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Stevens County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Traverse County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/14/2024 6:23 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Big Stone County, Grant County, Kittson County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake of the Woods County, Red Lake County, Stevens County, Traverse County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Clearwater County, Cook County, Rock County, Wilkin County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top