Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

New York Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
New York - falling falling trend - 7,596 30.1 (29.8, 30.4) - -5.1 (-5.4, -4.7)
Kings County 9 falling falling trend lower 643 22.7 (21.9, 23.5) 0.6 -6.6 (-7.9, -5.3)
Suffolk County 9 falling falling trend lower 609 30.6 (29.5, 31.8) 0.9 -6.0 (-7.3, -4.8)
Queens County 9 falling falling trend lower 595 20.9 (20.1, 21.6) 0.6 -6.4 (-7.4, -5.4)
Erie County 5 falling falling trend higher 500 38.7 (37.1, 40.3) 1.1 -5.7 (-7.3, -4.1)
Nassau County 9 falling falling trend lower 458 23.8 (22.8, 24.9) 0.7 -6.6 (-7.8, -5.3)
New York County 9 falling falling trend lower 436 20.8 (19.9, 21.7) 0.6 -8.0 (-10.3, -5.7)
Bronx County 9 falling falling trend lower 377 25.1 (23.9, 26.2) 0.7 -5.0 (-6.5, -3.4)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 347 34.9 (33.2, 36.6) 1.0 -4.7 (-6.0, -3.3)
Westchester County 9 falling falling trend lower 296 22.2 (21.1, 23.4) 0.6 -7.8 (-9.9, -5.7)
Onondaga County 5 falling falling trend higher 236 38.5 (36.3, 40.8) 1.1 -3.3 (-4.0, -2.6)
Richmond County 8 falling falling trend similar 203 34.1 (32.0, 36.3) 1.0 -3.4 (-4.3, -2.5)
Albany County 8 falling falling trend similar 151 37.7 (35.0, 40.5) 1.1 -5.0 (-7.4, -2.6)
Orange County 8 falling falling trend similar 151 35.5 (32.9, 38.1) 1.0 -5.9 (-9.6, -2.2)
Niagara County 5 falling falling trend higher 139 44.9 (41.6, 48.5) 1.3 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.7)
Dutchess County 8 falling falling trend similar 136 33.1 (30.6, 35.7) 0.9 -3.4 (-4.1, -2.7)
Oneida County 5 falling falling trend higher 135 41.3 (38.2, 44.6) 1.2 -3.8 (-6.0, -1.6)
Saratoga County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 39.4 (36.3, 42.7) 1.1 -6.4 (-10.7, -2.0)
Broome County 8 falling falling trend similar 106 38.0 (34.8, 41.5) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Rockland County 9 falling falling trend lower 98 24.6 (22.4, 26.9) 0.7 -2.6 (-3.1, -2.1)
Ulster County 8 falling falling trend similar 97 35.9 (32.7, 39.4) 1.0 -5.8 (-9.6, -1.9)
Rensselaer County 5 falling falling trend higher 92 43.6 (39.6, 47.9) 1.2 -4.6 (-6.8, -2.4)
Chautauqua County 4 stable stable trend higher 89 46.5 (42.1, 51.2) 1.3 -7.6 (-18.8, 5.1)
Schenectady County 5 falling falling trend higher 84 40.5 (36.6, 44.7) 1.2 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Oswego County 5 falling falling trend higher 76 49.4 (44.5, 54.8) 1.4 -3.2 (-4.8, -1.6)
Steuben County 5 falling falling trend higher 68 47.0 (42.0, 52.4) 1.3 -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Ontario County 8 falling falling trend similar 63 37.2 (33.1, 41.7) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
St. Lawrence County 5 falling falling trend higher 62 41.8 (37.2, 46.8) 1.2 -5.9 (-8.6, -3.2)
Chemung County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 49.8 (44.3, 56.0) 1.4 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 61 51.2 (45.5, 57.4) 1.5 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 45.4 (40.3, 51.1) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Clinton County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 47.0 (41.3, 53.3) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Cayuga County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 42.0 (36.8, 47.9) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Sullivan County 5 falling falling trend higher 48 43.3 (37.9, 49.3) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Cattaraugus County 5 falling falling trend higher 47 41.5 (36.2, 47.3) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Putnam County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 34.9 (30.5, 39.9) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 43.5 (37.9, 49.8) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 43 40.9 (35.5, 47.0) 1.2 -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Washington County 5 falling falling trend higher 42 45.3 (39.3, 52.1) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Livingston County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 44.2 (38.1, 51.1) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Genesee County 5 falling falling trend higher 37 44.8 (38.5, 52.0) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Herkimer County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 38.4 (32.9, 44.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Columbia County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 35.4 (30.3, 41.4) 1.0 -6.3 (-10.2, -2.2)
Fulton County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 46.1 (39.5, 53.6) 1.3 -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Tompkins County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 32.3 (27.6, 37.6) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 47.7 (40.6, 55.7) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Greene County 5 falling falling trend higher 34 43.4 (37.0, 50.8) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Chenango County 5 falling falling trend higher 32 43.7 (37.0, 51.4) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Otsego County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 33.8 (28.5, 39.9) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 39.1 (32.9, 46.4) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Orleans County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 53.6 (45.2, 63.3) 1.5 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Allegany County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 42.4 (35.6, 50.2) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Cortland County 5 falling falling trend higher 28 47.5 (39.9, 56.2) 1.4 -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 41.8 (35.1, 49.6) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Tioga County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 37.4 (31.4, 44.4) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Essex County 5 falling falling trend higher 28 42.4 (35.5, 50.6) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Schoharie County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 46.0 (37.4, 56.2) 1.3 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Seneca County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 44.2 (36.2, 53.7) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Wyoming County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 37.1 (30.2, 45.4) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Schuyler County 5 falling falling trend higher 15 50.8 (39.6, 64.8) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Yates County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 38.2 (29.6, 48.8) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Lewis County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 35.9 (27.7, 46.1) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 43.5 (25.4, 76.7) 1.2 -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2024 1:15 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top