Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Dakota Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
North Dakota - falling falling trend - 301 33.1 (31.4, 34.8) - -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Traill County 2 rising rising trend similar 5 40.0 (25.1, 61.6) 1.1 1.8 (0.5, 3.1)
Rolette County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 60.0 (42.4, 82.3) 1.7 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Williams County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 46.7 (35.8, 59.6) 1.3 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Barnes County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 26.0 (16.4, 40.5) 0.7 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Mercer County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 39.9 (25.7, 60.5) 1.1 -0.4 (-2.3, 1.7)
Ramsey County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 35.8 (24.1, 52.0) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Richland County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 34.1 (24.0, 47.5) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Stark County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 32.0 (23.7, 42.3) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Stutsman County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 35.7 (26.8, 47.2) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Walsh County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 33.2 (22.2, 48.8) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 32.8 (29.0, 37.0) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Grand Forks County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 39.2 (32.7, 46.6) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
McLean County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 30.4 (19.2, 47.1) 0.9 -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Morton County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 33.9 (26.1, 43.4) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Pembina County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 35.3 (22.2, 55.8) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Ward County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 31.1 (25.3, 37.8) 0.9 -4.8 (-8.2, -1.2)
Burleigh County 9 falling falling trend lower 36 30.3 (25.9, 35.2) 0.9 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Bottineau County
**
 		** similar 4 35.3 (21.7, 57.0) 1.0
**
McHenry County
**
 		** similar 3 35.1 (19.8, 59.8) 1.0
**
Adams County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Benson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Billings County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Bowman County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Burke County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cavalier County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dickey County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Divide County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dunn County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Eddy County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Emmons County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Foster County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Golden Valley County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Griggs County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hettinger County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kidder County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
LaMoure County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Logan County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McIntosh County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McKenzie County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mountrail County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Nelson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Oliver County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pierce County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ransom County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Renville County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sargent County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sheridan County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sioux County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Slope County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Steele County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Towner County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wells County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 7:57 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Adams County, Benson County, Billings County, Bowman County, Burke County, Cavalier County, Dickey County, Divide County, Dunn County, Eddy County, Emmons County, Foster County, Golden Valley County, Grant County, Griggs County, Hettinger County, Kidder County, LaMoure County, Logan County, McIntosh County, McKenzie County, Mountrail County, Nelson County, Oliver County, Pierce County, Ransom County, Renville County, Sargent County, Sheridan County, Sioux County, Slope County, Steele County, Towner County, Wells County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Bottineau County, McHenry County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top