Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 2,245 46.5 (45.6, 47.3) - -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Atoka County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 62.3 (48.1, 80.0) 1.8 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 55.1 (45.0, 67.0) 1.6 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Cherokee County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 52.7 (44.8, 61.6) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Craig County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 57.7 (44.3, 74.5) 1.7 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Custer County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 47.1 (36.8, 59.6) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Garvin County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 52.4 (42.3, 64.3) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Haskell County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 63.9 (48.4, 83.3) 1.8 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Kay County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 57.1 (49.0, 66.4) 1.6 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 67.0 (48.4, 91.3) 1.9 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 50.7 (42.2, 60.8) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Love County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 67.8 (49.7, 91.0) 1.9 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 60.7 (47.9, 76.5) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
McIntosh County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 66.9 (54.9, 81.4) 1.9 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Murray County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 71.4 (55.0, 91.5) 2.0 -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Muskogee County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 58.7 (51.8, 66.4) 1.7 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Noble County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 50.4 (36.2, 69.1) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Nowata County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 71.5 (53.6, 94.3) 2.0 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Okfuskee County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 58.7 (43.4, 78.4) 1.7 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Okmulgee County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 57.4 (48.5, 67.5) 1.6 -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Ottawa County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 70.1 (59.3, 82.5) 2.0 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Pawnee County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 51.3 (39.4, 66.2) 1.5 0.7 (-1.9, 3.4)
Payne County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 44.6 (38.2, 51.8) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 38 50.3 (43.3, 58.2) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Adair County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 49.6 (38.5, 63.0) 1.4 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Bryan County 5 falling falling trend higher 31 48.7 (41.2, 57.2) 1.4 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 54.0 (46.2, 62.9) 1.5 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Choctaw County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 55.0 (41.9, 71.6) 1.6 -3.4 (-6.4, -0.3)
Comanche County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 47.8 (42.4, 53.7) 1.4 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Creek County 5 falling falling trend higher 55 54.9 (48.5, 61.9) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Delaware County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 42.7 (36.1, 50.4) 1.2 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Garfield County 5 falling falling trend higher 34 43.1 (36.7, 50.3) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Grady County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 48.8 (41.7, 56.8) 1.4 -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Hughes County 5 falling falling trend higher 9 49.1 (36.0, 66.0) 1.4 -15.0 (-26.1, -2.2)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 47.8 (37.1, 60.8) 1.4 -3.8 (-6.6, -0.9)
Johnston County 5 falling falling trend higher 9 57.8 (42.3, 77.8) 1.7 -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Le Flore County 5 falling falling trend higher 40 58.5 (50.6, 67.5) 1.7 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Logan County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 42.5 (35.3, 50.8) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Mayes County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 60.4 (51.6, 70.4) 1.7 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
McClain County 5 falling falling trend higher 24 50.7 (41.9, 60.9) 1.5 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
McCurtain County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 64.0 (53.8, 75.8) 1.8 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 372 43.8 (41.8, 45.9) 1.3 -4.3 (-6.3, -2.2)
Pittsburg County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 54.1 (46.4, 62.9) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Pottawatomie County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 56.7 (50.0, 64.2) 1.6 -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pushmataha County 5 falling falling trend higher 11 59.6 (45.1, 78.5) 1.7 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Rogers County 5 falling falling trend higher 51 43.3 (38.0, 49.1) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Seminole County 5 falling falling trend higher 17 50.3 (40.1, 62.5) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Sequoyah County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 60.4 (51.7, 70.3) 1.7 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Stephens County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 48.2 (40.6, 57.0) 1.4 -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 296 40.2 (38.2, 42.4) 1.2 -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Alfalfa County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 35.5 (20.2, 60.2) 1.0 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Coal County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 50.4 (31.3, 78.8) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Cotton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 52.8 (33.4, 81.4) 1.5 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 56.0 (36.6, 84.0) 1.6 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Kingfisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 39.7 (28.0, 55.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Major County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 33.2 (20.0, 53.2) 1.0 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Pontotoc County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 43.2 (35.3, 52.5) 1.2 -11.9 (-23.2, 0.9)
Washita County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 35.3 (23.3, 51.9) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Woodward County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 33.8 (24.3, 46.0) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Beckham County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 43.7 (32.8, 57.3) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Blaine County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 31.7 (19.9, 48.9) 0.9 -6.8 (-11.2, -2.2)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 38.3 (34.0, 43.1) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 107 36.0 (33.0, 39.3) 1.0 -5.2 (-8.1, -2.1)
Latimer County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 47.1 (33.5, 65.4) 1.3 -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 40.2 (33.8, 47.6) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Texas County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 35.8 (24.7, 50.1) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Tillman County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 38.0 (23.4, 59.7) 1.1 -9.1 (-15.7, -2.0)
Wagoner County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 38.2 (33.0, 44.1) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Grant County
**
** similar 3 42.0 (23.9, 72.2) 1.2
**
Woods County
**
** similar 5 44.3 (28.6, 66.3) 1.3
**
Beaver County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cimarron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dewey County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ellis County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greer County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harmon County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Roger Mills County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/30/2024 3:26 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Beaver County, Cimarron County, Dewey County, Ellis County, Greer County, Harmon County, Harper County, Roger Mills County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Grant County, Woods County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top