Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Tennessee Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Tennessee - falling falling trend - 4,060 47.0 (46.3, 47.6) - -4.4 (-5.2, -3.5)
Shelby County 5 falling falling trend higher 405 39.6 (37.9, 41.5) 1.1 -5.2 (-7.1, -3.3)
Davidson County 8 falling falling trend similar 263 38.2 (36.1, 40.4) 1.1 -7.6 (-10.3, -4.7)
Knox County 5 falling falling trend higher 238 41.4 (39.0, 43.8) 1.2 -3.9 (-4.8, -3.0)
Hamilton County 8 falling falling trend similar 181 37.4 (35.0, 40.0) 1.1 -6.7 (-9.7, -3.6)
Sullivan County 5 falling falling trend higher 126 49.2 (45.3, 53.3) 1.4 -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Rutherford County 5 falling falling trend higher 120 43.0 (39.5, 46.8) 1.2 -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Sumner County 5 falling falling trend higher 103 44.4 (40.6, 48.5) 1.3 -2.7 (-3.6, -1.7)
Blount County 5 falling falling trend higher 91 45.0 (40.9, 49.5) 1.3 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Washington County 5 falling falling trend higher 85 47.0 (42.6, 51.8) 1.3 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 80 49.2 (44.3, 54.4) 1.4 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9)
Sevier County 5 falling falling trend higher 75 51.9 (46.6, 57.7) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Wilson County 5 falling falling trend higher 72 42.1 (37.8, 46.8) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Greene County 5 falling falling trend higher 67 60.2 (53.8, 67.3) 1.7 -3.3 (-5.0, -1.6)
Bradley County 5 falling falling trend higher 64 45.0 (40.2, 50.4) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Maury County 5 falling falling trend higher 58 48.6 (43.0, 54.8) 1.4 -12.3 (-22.6, -0.7)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 57 43.9 (38.8, 49.5) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Williamson County 9 falling falling trend lower 54 22.5 (19.8, 25.5) 0.6 -6.4 (-8.0, -4.9)
Hawkins County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 58.6 (51.6, 66.4) 1.7 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Anderson County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 45.2 (39.7, 51.3) 1.3 -4.6 (-6.8, -2.4)
Cumberland County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 41.8 (36.5, 48.0) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Putnam County 4 stable stable trend higher 52 52.3 (46.1, 59.3) 1.5 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
McMinn County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 57.6 (50.4, 65.8) 1.6 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Campbell County 4 stable stable trend higher 46 75.2 (65.7, 85.9) 2.2 -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Monroe County 4 stable stable trend higher 46 63.6 (55.4, 72.8) 1.8 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Robertson County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 53.8 (46.9, 61.5) 1.5 -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2)
Roane County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 49.1 (42.8, 56.2) 1.4 -5.3 (-8.0, -2.5)
Hamblen County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 48.9 (42.6, 56.0) 1.4 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 53.9 (46.9, 61.9) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Loudon County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 43.9 (38.0, 50.5) 1.3 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Tipton County 5 falling falling trend higher 43 60.8 (52.8, 69.8) 1.7 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Gibson County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 60.6 (52.5, 69.6) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Dickson County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 61.0 (52.8, 70.2) 1.7 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 43.8 (37.8, 50.7) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Coffee County 5 falling falling trend higher 38 52.0 (44.8, 60.2) 1.5 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Lawrence County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 60.4 (51.8, 70.1) 1.7 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Bedford County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 57.4 (48.9, 67.1) 1.6 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Dyer County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 65.3 (55.6, 76.4) 1.9 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Cocke County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 56.6 (48.0, 66.6) 1.6 -10.9 (-19.8, -1.0)
Rhea County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 70.7 (60.1, 82.8) 2.0 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Warren County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 54.0 (45.8, 63.5) 1.5 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Claiborne County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 65.0 (54.8, 76.7) 1.9 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Henry County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 54.5 (46.1, 64.4) 1.6 -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Carroll County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 68.9 (58.1, 81.3) 2.0 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Cheatham County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 54.6 (45.4, 65.3) 1.6 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Franklin County 5 falling falling trend higher 27 43.3 (36.1, 51.7) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Obion County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 54.8 (45.6, 65.7) 1.6 -3.9 (-7.1, -0.7)
Grainger County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 67.5 (55.9, 81.3) 1.9 -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Hardin County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 56.5 (46.7, 68.1) 1.6 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
McNairy County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 60.1 (49.8, 72.3) 1.7 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Lauderdale County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 75.0 (62.0, 90.0) 2.1 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Weakley County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 52.6 (43.5, 63.2) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 34.7 (28.6, 41.9) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 24 46.3 (38.2, 55.8) 1.3 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 55.2 (45.5, 66.6) 1.6 4.9 (-8.3, 19.9)
White County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 57.1 (47.0, 68.9) 1.6 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Marion County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 52.7 (43.4, 63.7) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Overton County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 66.5 (54.8, 80.3) 1.9 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Scott County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 76.5 (63.0, 92.4) 2.2 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Henderson County 5 falling falling trend higher 23 57.0 (46.8, 68.9) 1.6 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Hardeman County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 64.4 (52.7, 78.1) 1.8 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Hickman County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 60.8 (49.7, 73.9) 1.7 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Macon County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 68.8 (56.1, 83.6) 2.0 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Giles County 5 falling falling trend higher 21 46.0 (37.4, 56.3) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Fentress County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 68.9 (55.6, 85.0) 2.0 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Benton County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 73.3 (59.1, 90.7) 2.1 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
DeKalb County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 60.4 (48.2, 75.1) 1.7 -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Johnson County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 58.8 (46.8, 73.5) 1.7 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Union County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 62.1 (49.1, 77.7) 1.8 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Morgan County 5 falling falling trend higher 16 55.9 (44.3, 70.1) 1.6 -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Polk County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 62.2 (49.3, 78.2) 1.8 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Unicoi County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 52.8 (41.6, 66.6) 1.5 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Humphreys County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 53.6 (42.3, 67.5) 1.5 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 70.4 (54.9, 90.0) 2.0 -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Smith County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 57.7 (44.9, 73.2) 1.6 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Wayne County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 54.6 (42.2, 70.2) 1.6 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Decatur County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 65.1 (49.6, 85.0) 1.9 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Chester County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 54.6 (41.7, 70.5) 1.6 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Haywood County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 48.0 (36.5, 62.5) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Crockett County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 60.2 (45.9, 78.0) 1.7 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Grundy County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 58.2 (44.1, 76.0) 1.7 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Stewart County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 57.5 (43.6, 75.2) 1.6 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 62.5 (47.0, 82.2) 1.8 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Bledsoe County 5 falling falling trend higher 11 52.5 (39.4, 69.2) 1.5 -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Meigs County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 62.2 (46.3, 82.5) 1.8 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Cannon County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 52.8 (39.3, 69.9) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Sequatchie County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 44.9 (33.3, 59.8) 1.3 -8.4 (-15.7, -0.5)
Houston County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 73.2 (53.5, 99.0) 2.1 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 69.0 (49.0, 95.4) 2.0 -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 7 52.0 (36.5, 74.0) 1.5 -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Trousdale County 5 falling falling trend higher 7 60.2 (41.6, 84.6) 1.7 -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Pickett County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 65.8 (44.8, 97.2) 1.9 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Hancock County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 64.9 (43.6, 94.5) 1.9 -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Lake County 5 falling falling trend higher 5 57.5 (37.6, 85.4) 1.6 -4.7 (-7.3, -1.9)
Van Buren County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 54.7 (35.2, 83.3) 1.6 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Moore County
**
** similar 4 40.0 (24.2, 64.3) 1.1
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/03/2024 11:14 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Moore County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top