Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

West Virginia Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
West Virginia - falling falling trend - 1,349 49.7 (48.5, 51.0) - -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Gilmer County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 63.1 (43.0, 90.4) 1.8 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 79.5 (64.6, 97.4) 2.3 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 66.1 (53.3, 81.8) 1.9 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Logan County 5 falling falling trend higher 30 57.6 (48.5, 68.3) 1.6 -6.7 (-11.6, -1.5)
Wayne County 5 falling falling trend higher 33 52.0 (44.2, 61.0) 1.5 -4.1 (-5.8, -2.3)
Kanawha County 5 falling falling trend higher 134 48.0 (44.3, 51.9) 1.4 -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Cabell County 5 falling falling trend higher 63 48.1 (42.8, 53.9) 1.4 -3.2 (-4.9, -1.5)
Wirt County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 37.4 (21.9, 62.3) 1.1 -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Berkeley County 5 falling falling trend higher 71 50.8 (45.4, 56.6) 1.5 -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Doddridge County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 42.5 (28.0, 63.5) 1.2 -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Putnam County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 44.9 (38.5, 52.2) 1.3 -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Monongalia County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 32.3 (27.5, 37.7) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Braxton County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 41.6 (30.6, 56.2) 1.2 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Summers County 5 falling falling trend higher 11 50.0 (37.2, 66.8) 1.4 -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Calhoun County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 32.3 (19.8, 52.3) 0.9 -19.2 (-73.5, 146.6)
Jackson County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 43.7 (35.6, 53.5) 1.3 -12.3 (-22.0, -1.5)
Barbour County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 46.3 (34.5, 61.4) 1.3 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Mercer County 5 falling falling trend higher 46 48.2 (42.0, 55.3) 1.4 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 36 48.5 (41.4, 56.4) 1.4 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Taylor County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 52.0 (40.3, 66.6) 1.5 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Greenbrier County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 49.5 (41.6, 58.8) 1.4 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Mason County 5 falling falling trend higher 21 48.6 (39.7, 59.4) 1.4 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Nicholas County 5 falling falling trend higher 18 45.0 (36.1, 55.9) 1.3 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Clay County 5 falling falling trend higher 8 63.7 (45.4, 88.1) 1.8 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Randolph County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 47.2 (38.6, 57.4) 1.3 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Harrison County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 50.7 (44.6, 57.5) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Pocahontas County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 41.4 (26.7, 62.7) 1.2 -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Preston County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 41.4 (33.7, 50.5) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Marshall County 5 falling falling trend higher 26 52.7 (43.7, 63.3) 1.5 -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Roane County 4 stable stable trend higher 13 58.7 (45.1, 75.9) 1.7 -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Lincoln County 5 falling falling trend higher 19 62.1 (50.1, 76.5) 1.8 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Wood County 5 falling falling trend higher 70 53.8 (48.2, 60.0) 1.5 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Pleasants County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 58.7 (39.7, 84.8) 1.7 -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Boone County 5 falling falling trend higher 22 63.4 (51.7, 77.4) 1.8 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Upshur County 5 falling falling trend higher 18 49.2 (39.6, 60.8) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Mingo County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 74.8 (61.8, 89.9) 2.1 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Ohio County 5 falling falling trend higher 34 51.4 (43.5, 60.4) 1.5 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 29.5 (20.1, 43.2) 0.8 -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Tyler County 4 stable stable trend higher 8 54.3 (38.7, 75.8) 1.6 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Marion County 5 falling falling trend higher 39 47.9 (41.3, 55.4) 1.4 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Raleigh County 5 falling falling trend higher 57 51.6 (45.6, 58.2) 1.5 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Hardy County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 29.7 (20.4, 42.8) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Wetzel County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 55.6 (43.2, 71.3) 1.6 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Monroe County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 46.6 (35.0, 61.9) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Ritchie County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 44.7 (31.5, 63.0) 1.3 -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Tucker County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 40.6 (26.9, 62.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Hampshire County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 48.2 (38.7, 59.8) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hancock County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 48.9 (40.4, 59.1) 1.4 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pendleton County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 31.1 (19.2, 50.6) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 60.3 (43.7, 82.9) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Brooke County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 51.2 (41.2, 63.4) 1.5 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Fayette County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 58.4 (50.4, 67.5) 1.7 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
McDowell County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 59.8 (47.7, 74.7) 1.7 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Mineral County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 41.6 (33.1, 52.0) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Wyoming County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 70.3 (57.3, 85.8) 2.0 -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 2:06 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top