Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Alabama Counties versus United States

Breast

All Races, Female

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 42,101 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Alabama - falling falling trend - 702 20.9 (20.2, 21.6) - -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Lee County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 25.4 (20.8, 30.8) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 106 23.3 (21.3, 25.5) 1.2 -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Mobile County 5 falling falling trend higher 62 22.9 (20.3, 25.6) 1.2 -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 27.2 (23.5, 31.3) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Blount County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 21.8 (15.7, 29.7) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Chilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 18.3 (11.9, 27.2) 0.9 -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Clarke County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 25.7 (16.4, 39.2) 1.3 -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Dale County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 16.8 (11.2, 24.6) 0.9 -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Dallas County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 17.2 (10.4, 26.9) 0.9 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
DeKalb County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 19.6 (14.2, 26.4) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Escambia County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 28.0 (19.1, 40.1) 1.4 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Etowah County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 21.8 (17.3, 27.3) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Franklin County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 17.8 (10.3, 29.0) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.8, 0.4)
Geneva County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 24.2 (15.3, 37.2) 1.2 -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Lawrence County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 17.0 (10.1, 27.4) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Marengo County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 30.0 (18.0, 47.5) 1.5 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Marion County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 23.9 (15.6, 35.8) 1.2 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Pike County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 23.9 (15.0, 36.4) 1.2 -0.3 (-2.1, 1.4)
Russell County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 22.9 (16.5, 31.1) 1.2 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Shelby County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 17.0 (14.0, 20.5) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
St. Clair County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 15.2 (10.9, 20.6) 0.8 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Winston County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 17.5 (10.2, 29.1) 0.9 -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Autauga County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 15.5 (10.4, 22.6) 0.8 -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Baldwin County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 20.1 (17.1, 23.6) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Calhoun County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 18.6 (14.5, 23.6) 0.9 -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Chambers County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 24.3 (16.8, 34.8) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Coffee County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 19.5 (13.4, 27.5) 1.0 -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Colbert County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 23.7 (17.1, 32.2) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Covington County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 18.9 (12.6, 27.8) 1.0 -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Elmore County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 17.6 (12.9, 23.7) 0.9 -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Houston County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 16.3 (12.5, 21.1) 0.8 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 19.1 (13.2, 27.0) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Lauderdale County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 15.7 (11.8, 20.6) 0.8 -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Limestone County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 18.4 (13.8, 24.1) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 19.6 (17.1, 22.4) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Marshall County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 15.4 (11.3, 20.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Morgan County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 23.6 (19.0, 29.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Talladega County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 24.4 (18.8, 31.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Tuscaloosa County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 19.8 (16.3, 24.0) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.2, -1.5)
Walker County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 16.8 (11.9, 23.3) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Cullman County 9 falling falling trend lower 7 12.4 (8.6, 17.5) 0.6 -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Butler County
**
** similar 4 26.7 (15.9, 42.8) 1.4
**
Cherokee County
**
** similar 3 14.4 (8.1, 25.0) 0.7
**
Fayette County
**
** similar 3 28.0 (15.3, 47.8) 1.4
**
Hale County
**
** similar 3 32.7 (18.2, 54.9) 1.7
**
Lamar County
**
** higher 4 39.5 (23.9, 62.9) 2.0
**
Macon County
**
** higher 5 35.4 (21.9, 55.0) 1.8
**
Monroe County
**
** similar 5 30.3 (19.1, 46.5) 1.5
**
Tallapoosa County
**
** similar 7 20.6 (13.8, 30.0) 1.0
**
Wilcox County
**
** similar 3 38.5 (22.0, 64.6) 2.0
**
Barbour County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Bibb County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Bullock County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Choctaw County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Clay County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cleburne County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Conecuh County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Coosa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Crenshaw County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greene County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Henry County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lowndes County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Perry County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pickens County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Randolph County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sumter County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Washington County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/03/2024 2:57 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Barbour County, Bibb County, Bullock County, Choctaw County, Clay County, Cleburne County, Conecuh County, Coosa County, Crenshaw County, Greene County, Henry County, Lowndes County, Perry County, Pickens County, Randolph County, Sumter County, Washington County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Butler County, Cherokee County, Fayette County, Hale County, Lamar County, Macon County, Monroe County, Tallapoosa County, Wilcox County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top