Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Wisconsin Counties versus United States

Breast

All Races, Female

Sorted by count
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 42,101 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) - -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Wisconsin - falling falling trend - 722 18.4 (17.8, 19.0) - -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Milwaukee County 8 falling falling trend similar 112 20.1 (18.4, 21.9) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Dane County 8 falling falling trend similar 56 18.3 (16.1, 20.6) 0.9 -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Waukesha County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 17.5 (15.3, 19.8) 0.9 -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
Brown County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 22.6 (19.4, 26.2) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Racine County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 20.1 (16.7, 23.9) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Rock County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 20.4 (16.7, 24.7) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Kenosha County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 20.2 (16.4, 24.6) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Winnebago County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 18.2 (14.6, 22.4) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Outagamie County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 16.4 (13.2, 20.1) 0.8 -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Marathon County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 17.3 (13.6, 21.7) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Sheboygan County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 17.0 (13.3, 21.7) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Walworth County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 20.9 (16.2, 26.6) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Fond du Lac County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 19.2 (14.8, 24.5) 1.0 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
La Crosse County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 18.2 (14.1, 23.3) 0.9 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Washington County 9 falling falling trend lower 13 13.5 (10.4, 17.5) 0.7 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Manitowoc County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 21.5 (16.3, 28.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Wood County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 21.3 (15.8, 28.3) 1.1 -7.3 (-43.2, 51.4)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 19.7 (14.7, 26.0) 1.0 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Dodge County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 17.2 (12.8, 22.8) 0.9 -3.3 (-4.4, -2.1)
Ozaukee County 9 falling falling trend lower 10 14.6 (10.7, 19.6) 0.7 -3.3 (-4.5, -2.1)
St. Croix County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 19.1 (14.1, 25.3) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Columbia County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 25.3 (18.4, 34.2) 1.3 -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Sauk County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 18.9 (13.5, 25.9) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Eau Claire County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 12.5 (8.9, 17.3) 0.6 -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Oneida County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 27.3 (18.6, 39.3) 1.4 -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Portage County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 17.5 (12.4, 24.3) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Waupaca County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 20.2 (14.1, 28.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Barron County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 19.5 (13.1, 28.2) 1.0 -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 21.5 (14.6, 30.9) 1.1 -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Marinette County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 19.5 (12.8, 28.9) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 20.0 (13.5, 28.8) 1.0 -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Grant County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 17.3 (11.2, 25.7) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Green County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 19.4 (12.4, 29.3) 1.0 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Vilas County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 23.3 (15.1, 36.9) 1.2 -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Chippewa County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 12.6 (8.0, 19.0) 0.6 -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 16.2 (10.3, 24.6) 0.8 -3.7 (-5.4, -2.0)
Dunn County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 18.6 (12.0, 27.8) 0.9 -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Vernon County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 23.5 (14.9, 35.7) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Oconto County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 19.4 (12.0, 30.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Door County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 18.9 (10.7, 31.7) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Calumet County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 13.7 (8.4, 21.4) 0.7 -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Juneau County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 21.2 (12.7, 34.0) 1.1 -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Clark County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 13.6 (7.9, 22.3) 0.7 -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 13.5 (8.0, 23.0) 0.7 -8.0 (-12.8, -2.8)
Pierce County 9 falling falling trend lower 3 12.9 (7.4, 21.3) 0.7 -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Ashland County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 27.9 (15.3, 47.8) 1.4 -0.3 (-2.4, 2.0)
Green Lake County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 17.1 (9.7, 30.0) 0.9 -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Bayfield County
**
 		** similar 3 24.1 (13.3, 43.0) 1.2
**
Marquette County
**
 		** similar 3 23.4 (12.8, 41.6) 1.2
**
Shawano County
**
 		** similar 4 14.1 (8.5, 22.5) 0.7
**
Adams County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Buffalo County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Burnett County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Crawford County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Florence County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Forest County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iowa County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iron County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jackson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kewaunee County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lafayette County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Langlade County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Menominee County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pepin County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Price County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Richland County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rusk County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sawyer County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Taylor County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Trempealeau County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Washburn County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Waushara County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 6:17 pm.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Adams County, Buffalo County, Burnett County, Crawford County, Florence County, Forest County, Iowa County, Iron County, Jackson County, Kewaunee County, Lafayette County, Langlade County, Menominee County, Pepin County, Price County, Richland County, Rusk County, Sawyer County, Taylor County, Trempealeau County, Washburn County, Waushara County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Bayfield County, Marquette County, Shawano County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top