Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

California Counties versus United States

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS)

All Races, Female

Sorted by name

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - rising - 12,373 5.3 (5.3, 5.4) - 1.4 (0.7, 1.7)
California - rising - 1,374 5.5 (5.3, 5.6) - 1.9 (1.6, 2.2)
Yuba County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Yolo County 6 stable similar 6 5.2 (3.5, 7.4) 1.0 1.7 (-0.8, 5.1)
Ventura County 7 stable lower 26 4.4 (3.7, 5.3) 0.8 -8.3 (-26.3, 2.2)
Tuolumne County
**
** similar 4 7.4 (4.5, 12.2) 1.4
**
Tulare County 2 rising similar 15 5.8 (4.5, 7.3) 1.1 3.0 (1.1, 5.5)
Trinity County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tehama County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sutter County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Stanislaus County 2 rising similar 15 4.9 (3.8, 6.1) 0.9 2.7 (0.8, 5.1)
Sonoma County 2 rising similar 23 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 1.1 2.5 (1.1, 4.3)
Solano County 2 rising similar 20 6.5 (5.2, 7.9) 1.2 2.6 (1.1, 4.6)
Siskiyou County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Shasta County 2 rising similar 9 6.3 (4.6, 8.7) 1.2 2.6 (0.3, 5.7)
Santa Cruz County 6 stable similar 9 5.0 (3.6, 6.8) 0.9 1.2 (-1.0, 3.8)
Santa Clara County 3 rising lower 55 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 0.9 1.4 (0.6, 2.4)
Santa Barbara County 7 stable lower 11 4.1 (3.0, 5.4) 0.8 1.9 (-0.6, 4.6)
San Mateo County 6 stable similar 25 4.6 (3.8, 5.5) 0.9 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
San Luis Obispo County 6 stable similar 11 5.0 (3.7, 6.7) 0.9 2.2 (-1.1, 6.3)
San Joaquin County 6 stable similar 24 5.3 (4.4, 6.4) 1.0 1.3 (-0.3, 3.2)
San Francisco County 6 stable similar 31 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) 1.0 2.5 (-8.6, 10.5)
San Diego County 1 rising higher 124 6.0 (5.5, 6.5) 1.1 2.5 (1.8, 3.4)
San Bernardino County 2 rising similar 71 5.9 (5.3, 6.5) 1.1 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)
San Benito County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sacramento County 1 rising higher 68 6.6 (5.9, 7.4) 1.2 2.8 (1.8, 4.3)
Riverside County 2 rising similar 88 5.8 (5.2, 6.4) 1.1 3.0 (2.1, 4.2)
Plumas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Placer County 6 stable similar 16 4.7 (3.7, 5.9) 0.9 1.9 (-0.3, 5.0)
Orange County 3 rising lower 101 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 0.9 1.6 (0.8, 2.6)
Nevada County
**
** similar 6 5.2 (3.4, 8.0) 1.0
**
Napa County 6 stable similar 5 4.9 (3.2, 7.4) 0.9 1.1 (-2.3, 5.1)
Monterey County 6 stable similar 12 4.8 (3.7, 6.3) 0.9 1.4 (-1.0, 4.5)
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Modoc County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Merced County
**
** similar 6 4.4 (3.0, 6.3) 0.8
**
Mendocino County
**
** similar 4 4.9 (2.9, 8.2) 0.9
**
Mariposa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Marin County 6 stable similar 10 4.1 (3.0, 5.7) 0.8 -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Madera County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Los Angeles County 1 rising higher 374 6.0 (5.7, 6.3) 1.1 1.8 (1.3, 2.4)
Lassen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kings County
**
** higher 6 8.6 (5.7, 12.4) 1.6
**
Kern County 6 stable similar 22 5.0 (4.1, 6.1) 0.9 1.2 (-0.6, 3.3)
Inyo County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Imperial County
**
** lower 4 3.5 (2.1, 5.7) 0.7
**
Humboldt County
**
** similar 6 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) 1.1
**
Glenn County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Fresno County 2 rising similar 28 5.2 (4.3, 6.1) 1.0 2.2 (0.9, 3.9)
El Dorado County 6 stable similar 7 4.1 (2.8, 6.0) 0.8 0.7 (-2.3, 5.0)
Del Norte County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Contra Costa County 2 rising similar 43 5.3 (4.6, 6.1) 1.0 1.5 (0.2, 3.1)
Colusa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Calaveras County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Butte County 6 stable similar 6 4.4 (2.9, 6.4) 0.8 1.8 (-1.9, 6.4)
Amador County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alameda County 2 rising similar 58 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 1.0 1.7 (0.6, 3.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/15/2026 10:06 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Amador County, Calaveras County, Colusa County, Del Norte County, Glenn County, Inyo County, Lake County, Lassen County, Madera County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Mono County, Plumas County, San Benito County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Sutter County, Tehama County, Trinity County, Yuba County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Humboldt County, Imperial County, Kings County, Mendocino County, Merced County, Nevada County, Tuolumne County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top