Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2019-2023

California Counties versus United States

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS)

All Races, Female

Sorted by priority index

Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - rising - 12,373 5.3 (5.3, 5.4) - 1.4 (0.7, 1.7)
California - rising - 1,374 5.5 (5.3, 5.6) - 1.9 (1.6, 2.2)
Santa Barbara County 7 stable lower 11 4.1 (3.0, 5.4) 0.8 1.9 (-0.6, 4.6)
Ventura County 7 stable lower 26 4.4 (3.7, 5.3) 0.8 -8.3 (-26.3, 2.2)
Butte County 6 stable similar 6 4.4 (2.9, 6.4) 0.8 1.8 (-1.9, 6.4)
El Dorado County 6 stable similar 7 4.1 (2.8, 6.0) 0.8 0.7 (-2.3, 5.0)
Kern County 6 stable similar 22 5.0 (4.1, 6.1) 0.9 1.2 (-0.6, 3.3)
Marin County 6 stable similar 10 4.1 (3.0, 5.7) 0.8 -0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Monterey County 6 stable similar 12 4.8 (3.7, 6.3) 0.9 1.4 (-1.0, 4.5)
Napa County 6 stable similar 5 4.9 (3.2, 7.4) 0.9 1.1 (-2.3, 5.1)
Placer County 6 stable similar 16 4.7 (3.7, 5.9) 0.9 1.9 (-0.3, 5.0)
San Francisco County 6 stable similar 31 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) 1.0 2.5 (-8.6, 10.5)
San Joaquin County 6 stable similar 24 5.3 (4.4, 6.4) 1.0 1.3 (-0.3, 3.2)
San Luis Obispo County 6 stable similar 11 5.0 (3.7, 6.7) 0.9 2.2 (-1.1, 6.3)
San Mateo County 6 stable similar 25 4.6 (3.8, 5.5) 0.9 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Santa Cruz County 6 stable similar 9 5.0 (3.6, 6.8) 0.9 1.2 (-1.0, 3.8)
Yolo County 6 stable similar 6 5.2 (3.5, 7.4) 1.0 1.7 (-0.8, 5.1)
Orange County 3 rising lower 101 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 0.9 1.6 (0.8, 2.6)
Santa Clara County 3 rising lower 55 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 0.9 1.4 (0.6, 2.4)
Alameda County 2 rising similar 58 5.5 (4.9, 6.2) 1.0 1.7 (0.6, 3.0)
Contra Costa County 2 rising similar 43 5.3 (4.6, 6.1) 1.0 1.5 (0.2, 3.1)
Fresno County 2 rising similar 28 5.2 (4.3, 6.1) 1.0 2.2 (0.9, 3.9)
Riverside County 2 rising similar 88 5.8 (5.2, 6.4) 1.1 3.0 (2.1, 4.2)
San Bernardino County 2 rising similar 71 5.9 (5.3, 6.5) 1.1 2.3 (1.2, 3.5)
Shasta County 2 rising similar 9 6.3 (4.6, 8.7) 1.2 2.6 (0.3, 5.7)
Solano County 2 rising similar 20 6.5 (5.2, 7.9) 1.2 2.6 (1.1, 4.6)
Sonoma County 2 rising similar 23 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 1.1 2.5 (1.1, 4.3)
Stanislaus County 2 rising similar 15 4.9 (3.8, 6.1) 0.9 2.7 (0.8, 5.1)
Tulare County 2 rising similar 15 5.8 (4.5, 7.3) 1.1 3.0 (1.1, 5.5)
Los Angeles County 1 rising higher 374 6.0 (5.7, 6.3) 1.1 1.8 (1.3, 2.4)
Sacramento County 1 rising higher 68 6.6 (5.9, 7.4) 1.2 2.8 (1.8, 4.3)
San Diego County 1 rising higher 124 6.0 (5.5, 6.5) 1.1 2.5 (1.8, 3.4)
Humboldt County
**
** similar 6 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) 1.1
**
Imperial County
**
** lower 4 3.5 (2.1, 5.7) 0.7
**
Kings County
**
** higher 6 8.6 (5.7, 12.4) 1.6
**
Mendocino County
**
** similar 4 4.9 (2.9, 8.2) 0.9
**
Merced County
**
** similar 6 4.4 (3.0, 6.3) 0.8
**
Nevada County
**
** similar 6 5.2 (3.4, 8.0) 1.0
**
Tuolumne County
**
** similar 4 7.4 (4.5, 12.2) 1.4
**
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Amador County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Calaveras County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Colusa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Del Norte County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Glenn County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Inyo County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lassen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Madera County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mariposa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Modoc County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Plumas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
San Benito County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Siskiyou County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sutter County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tehama County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Trinity County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Yuba County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 2:49 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Amador County, Calaveras County, Colusa County, Del Norte County, Glenn County, Inyo County, Lake County, Lassen County, Madera County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Mono County, Plumas County, San Benito County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Sutter County, Tehama County, Trinity County, Yuba County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Humboldt County, Imperial County, Kings County, Mendocino County, Merced County, Nevada County, Tuolumne County

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States do not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top