Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

Ovary

All Races, Female

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index ascending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 13,809 6.3 (6.3, 6.4) - -3.4 (-4.6, -2.2)
California - falling falling trend - 1,583 6.6 (6.4, 6.7) - -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Monterey County 9 falling falling trend lower 12 4.8 (3.7, 6.3) 0.8 -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Sacramento County 9 falling falling trend lower 51 5.4 (4.8, 6.2) 0.9 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 54 4.7 (4.1, 5.3) 0.7 -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Alameda County 8 falling falling trend similar 65 6.4 (5.7, 7.2) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Contra Costa County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 6.2 (5.4, 7.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Kern County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 6.6 (5.5, 7.7) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Los Angeles County 8 falling falling trend similar 418 6.9 (6.6, 7.2) 1.1 -4.3 (-8.2, -0.2)
Madera County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 6.6 (4.4, 9.6) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Marin County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 7.8 (6.1, 9.8) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 6.7 (4.8, 9.0) 1.1 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Napa County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 8.2 (5.9, 11.2) 1.3 -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Placer County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) 0.9 -6.5 (-10.9, -1.9)
Riverside County 8 falling falling trend similar 100 6.9 (6.3, 7.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
San Bernardino County 8 falling falling trend similar 74 6.6 (5.9, 7.3) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
San Diego County 8 falling falling trend similar 134 6.7 (6.2, 7.2) 1.1 -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
San Francisco County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 5.6 (4.7, 6.6) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
San Mateo County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 5.4 (4.6, 6.4) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.4)
Santa Barbara County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 6.9 (5.5, 8.4) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Solano County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 6.1 (4.8, 7.6) 1.0 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Sonoma County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 7.1 (5.9, 8.4) 1.1 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Stanislaus County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 7.0 (5.7, 8.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Tulare County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 7.6 (6.0, 9.4) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Yolo County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 7.1 (5.1, 9.6) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Butte County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 7.5 (5.5, 9.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
El Dorado County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 6.0 (4.4, 8.2) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Fresno County 6 stable stable trend similar 37 7.1 (6.1, 8.3) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Humboldt County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 8.9 (6.2, 12.3) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Nevada County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 7.9 (5.5, 11.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
San Joaquin County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 7.5 (6.3, 8.7) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
San Luis Obispo County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 7.4 (5.8, 9.3) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Santa Cruz County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 7.1 (5.4, 9.2) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Shasta County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 6.8 (5.0, 9.3) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Ventura County 6 stable stable trend similar 40 7.0 (6.0, 8.0) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Orange County 5 falling falling trend higher 142 7.0 (6.5, 7.6) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Calaveras County
**
** similar 4 9.9 (5.5, 17.0) 1.6
**
Imperial County
**
** similar 5 5.2 (3.3, 7.9) 0.8
**
Kings County
**
** similar 6 8.7 (5.7, 12.6) 1.4
**
Lake County
**
** similar 4 6.9 (4.1, 11.3) 1.1
**
Mendocino County
**
** similar 5 7.2 (4.6, 10.9) 1.1
**
Tehama County
**
** similar 3 6.0 (3.4, 10.2) 1.0
**
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Amador County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Colusa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Del Norte County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Glenn County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Inyo County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lassen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mariposa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Modoc County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Plumas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
San Benito County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Siskiyou County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sutter County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Trinity County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tuolumne County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Yuba County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/30/2024 11:10 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Amador County, Colusa County, Del Norte County, Glenn County, Inyo County, Lassen County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Mono County, Plumas County, San Benito County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Sutter County, Trinity County, Tuolumne County, Yuba County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Calaveras County, Imperial County, Kings County, Lake County, Mendocino County, Tehama County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top