Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

North Carolina Counties versus United States

Ovary

All Races, Female

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 13,809 6.3 (6.3, 6.4) - -3.4 (-4.6, -2.2)
North Carolina - falling falling trend - 401 5.7 (5.4, 5.9) - -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Yancey County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Yadkin County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wilson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wilkes County
**
** similar 4 7.6 (4.3, 12.7) 1.2
**
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 8.1 (5.6, 11.4) 1.3 -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Watauga County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Washington County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Warren County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wake County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 5.8 (4.9, 6.8) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Vance County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Union County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 7.7 (5.7, 10.2) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Tyrrell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Transylvania County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Swain County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Surry County 8 falling falling trend similar 3 5.3 (3.0, 9.1) 0.8 -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Stokes County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Stanly County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Scotland County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sampson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rutherford County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rowan County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 5.7 (3.8, 8.4) 0.9 -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Rockingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 3 4.8 (2.6, 8.3) 0.8 -2.7 (-4.3, -1.0)
Robeson County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 4.9 (3.0, 7.6) 0.8 -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Richmond County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Randolph County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 7.2 (4.9, 10.1) 1.1 -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Polk County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pitt County
**
** similar 5 4.6 (2.9, 7.0) 0.7
**
Person County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Perquimans County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pender County
**
** similar 4 9.3 (5.6, 14.8) 1.5
**
Pasquotank County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Pamlico County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Orange County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 4.8 (2.9, 7.5) 0.8 -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Onslow County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 9.0 (6.3, 12.6) 1.4 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Northampton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
New Hanover County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 7.4 (5.6, 9.7) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Nash County
**
** similar 4 5.8 (3.4, 9.2) 0.9
**
Moore County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Montgomery County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mitchell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mecklenburg County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 5.6 (4.8, 6.6) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
McDowell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Martin County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Madison County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Macon County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 7.1 (4.4, 11.2) 1.1 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Lenoir County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lee County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jones County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Johnston County
**
** similar 8 7.0 (4.9, 9.6) 1.1
**
Jackson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iredell County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 5.3 (3.5, 7.7) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.8, 0.0)
Hyde County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hoke County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hertford County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Henderson County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 7.3 (5.3, 10.0) 1.2 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Haywood County
**
** similar 3 5.1 (3.0, 8.9) 0.8
**
Harnett County
**
** similar 6 7.6 (5.1, 11.0) 1.2
**
Halifax County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Guilford County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 5.9 (4.8, 7.2) 0.9 -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Greene County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Granville County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Graham County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gates County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gaston County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 4.0 (2.7, 5.8) 0.6 -8.3 (-11.6, -4.8)
Franklin County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Forsyth County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 5.3 (4.1, 6.8) 0.8 -4.8 (-7.6, -1.8)
Edgecombe County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Durham County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 5.3 (3.9, 7.1) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Duplin County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Davie County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Davidson County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 4.3 (2.9, 6.4) 0.7 -2.2 (-3.7, -0.6)
Dare County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Currituck County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cumberland County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 4.6 (3.3, 6.3) 0.7 -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Craven County
**
** similar 6 7.0 (4.6, 10.4) 1.1
**
Columbus County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 8.1 (5.4, 11.9) 1.3 -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Clay County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Chowan County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cherokee County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Chatham County
**
** similar 4 6.2 (3.7, 10.2) 1.0
**
Catawba County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 6.8 (4.8, 9.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Caswell County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Carteret County
**
** similar 4 6.7 (3.8, 11.3) 1.1
**
Camden County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Caldwell County
**
** similar 4 6.0 (3.5, 9.9) 0.9
**
Cabarrus County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 4.2 (2.7, 6.1) 0.7 -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Burke County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Buncombe County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 7.1 (5.5, 9.0) 1.1 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Brunswick County 9 falling falling trend lower 8 4.6 (3.2, 6.8) 0.7 -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Bladen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Bertie County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Beaufort County
**
** similar 3 8.8 (4.8, 15.1) 1.4
**
Avery County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ashe County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Anson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alleghany County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alexander County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alamance County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 7.1 (5.1, 9.7) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 8:12 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alexander County, Alleghany County, Anson County, Ashe County, Avery County, Bertie County, Bladen County, Burke County, Camden County, Caswell County, Cherokee County, Chowan County, Clay County, Columbus County, Currituck County, Dare County, Davie County, Duplin County, Edgecombe County, Franklin County, Gates County, Graham County, Granville County, Greene County, Halifax County, Hertford County, Hoke County, Hyde County, Jackson County, Jones County, Lee County, Lenoir County, Macon County, Madison County, Martin County, McDowell County, Mitchell County, Montgomery County, Moore County, Northampton County, Pamlico County, Pasquotank County, Perquimans County, Person County, Polk County, Richmond County, Rutherford County, Sampson County, Scotland County, Stanly County, Stokes County, Swain County, Transylvania County, Tyrrell County, Vance County, Warren County, Washington County, Watauga County, Wilson County, Yadkin County, Yancey County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Beaufort County, Caldwell County, Carteret County, Chatham County, Craven County, Harnett County, Haywood County, Johnston County, Nash County, Pender County, Pitt County, Wilkes County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top