Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

California Counties versus United States

Prostate

All Races, Male

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - stable stable trend - 31,337 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) - -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
California - stable stable trend - 3,649 19.8 (19.5, 20.1) - -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Sacramento County 1 rising rising trend higher 150 21.7 (20.2, 23.4) 1.2 7.8 (1.7, 14.3)
Riverside County 4 stable stable trend higher 252 21.0 (19.8, 22.2) 1.1 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
San Diego County 4 stable stable trend higher 331 21.5 (20.5, 22.6) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
San Joaquin County 4 stable stable trend higher 71 23.6 (21.1, 26.2) 1.3 0.5 (-1.9, 2.9)
Solano County 4 stable stable trend higher 55 26.4 (23.3, 29.8) 1.4 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Butte County 5 falling falling trend higher 29 22.6 (19.0, 26.7) 1.2 -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Humboldt County 5 falling falling trend higher 20 26.3 (21.3, 32.3) 1.4 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Kern County 5 falling falling trend higher 70 22.2 (19.9, 24.7) 1.2 -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Mendocino County 5 falling falling trend higher 14 24.8 (19.2, 31.7) 1.3 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
San Bernardino County 5 falling falling trend higher 194 25.0 (23.4, 26.6) 1.3 -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Stanislaus County 5 falling falling trend higher 52 23.1 (20.3, 26.1) 1.2 -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Contra Costa County 6 stable stable trend similar 116 20.0 (18.4, 21.7) 1.1 1.3 (-1.6, 4.2)
Fresno County 6 stable stable trend similar 74 18.9 (17.0, 21.0) 1.0 3.7 (-1.4, 9.1)
Kings County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 15.0 (10.6, 20.4) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
San Francisco County 7 stable stable trend lower 76 15.9 (14.3, 17.6) 0.8 3.1 (-2.0, 8.5)
Alameda County 8 falling falling trend similar 136 18.2 (16.8, 19.7) 1.0 -3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)
Amador County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 16.8 (11.1, 25.1) 0.9 -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Calaveras County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 23.8 (17.4, 32.5) 1.3 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
El Dorado County 8 falling falling trend similar 25 18.6 (15.4, 22.3) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Imperial County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 15.8 (12.1, 20.1) 0.8 -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 22.8 (16.9, 30.3) 1.2 -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Los Angeles County 8 falling falling trend similar 892 20.0 (19.4, 20.6) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Madera County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 18.7 (14.4, 23.9) 1.0 -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Merced County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 20.8 (17.0, 25.2) 1.1 -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Monterey County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 17.1 (14.6, 20.0) 0.9 -2.9 (-3.6, -2.2)
Napa County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 21.2 (17.2, 26.0) 1.1 -2.3 (-3.1, -1.6)
Nevada County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 19.5 (15.5, 24.5) 1.0 -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Orange County 8 falling falling trend similar 277 17.9 (17.0, 18.9) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Placer County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 18.4 (16.1, 21.0) 1.0 -3.0 (-3.7, -2.2)
San Luis Obispo County 8 falling falling trend similar 37 19.9 (17.1, 23.0) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Santa Barbara County 8 falling falling trend similar 43 18.2 (15.8, 20.8) 1.0 -2.1 (-2.8, -1.5)
Santa Cruz County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 20.8 (17.4, 24.7) 1.1 -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Shasta County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 22.6 (18.9, 26.9) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Siskiyou County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 24.1 (17.1, 33.4) 1.3 -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Sonoma County 8 falling falling trend similar 57 19.3 (17.1, 21.7) 1.0 -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Sutter County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 22.4 (17.0, 29.0) 1.2 -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Tehama County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 20.6 (14.9, 28.0) 1.1 -3.1 (-4.0, -2.1)
Tulare County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 18.3 (15.5, 21.4) 1.0 -2.6 (-3.3, -2.0)
Tuolumne County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 14.6 (10.1, 20.9) 0.8 -3.7 (-5.2, -2.1)
Ventura County 8 falling falling trend similar 80 18.4 (16.7, 20.4) 1.0 -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Yolo County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 20.9 (16.7, 25.7) 1.1 -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Yuba County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 25.8 (18.2, 35.3) 1.4 -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Marin County 9 falling falling trend lower 30 15.9 (13.5, 18.8) 0.8 -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8)
San Mateo County 9 falling falling trend lower 69 16.7 (15.0, 18.6) 0.9 -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Santa Clara County 9 falling falling trend lower 127 14.3 (13.2, 15.5) 0.8 -3.1 (-3.4, -2.8)
Del Norte County
**
** similar 4 22.4 (13.0, 36.1) 1.2
**
Glenn County
**
** similar 3 22.0 (12.5, 36.0) 1.2
**
San Benito County
**
** similar 4 14.7 (8.7, 23.0) 0.8
**
Alpine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Colusa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Inyo County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lassen County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mariposa County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Modoc County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mono County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Plumas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sierra County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Trinity County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/20/2024 3:22 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alpine County, Colusa County, Inyo County, Lassen County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Mono County, Plumas County, Sierra County, Trinity County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Del Norte County, Glenn County, San Benito County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top