Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Indiana Counties versus United States

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by name
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 20,291 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) - -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Indiana - falling falling trend - 461 5.8 (5.6, 6.1) - -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Whitley County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
White County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wells County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wayne County 4 stable stable trend higher 9 9.3 (6.7, 12.8) 1.8 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Washington County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Warrick County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 4.9 (3.0, 7.7) 0.9 -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Warren County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wabash County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 6.8 (3.9, 11.5) 1.3 -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Vigo County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 5.9 (4.2, 8.2) 1.1 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Vermillion County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Vanderburgh County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 4.8 (3.6, 6.3) 0.9 -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Union County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tipton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Tippecanoe County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 6.3 (4.7, 8.3) 1.2 -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Switzerland County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sullivan County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Steuben County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Starke County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
St. Joseph County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 6.1 (5.0, 7.5) 1.2 -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Spencer County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Shelby County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Scott County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rush County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ripley County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Randolph County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Putnam County
**
 		** similar 3 7.0 (4.0, 11.6) 1.4
**
Pulaski County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Posey County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Porter County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 5.5 (4.1, 7.1) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Pike County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Perry County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Parke County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Owen County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Orange County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ohio County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Noble County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Newton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Morgan County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 6.1 (3.9, 9.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Montgomery County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 4.8 (3.3, 6.7) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Miami County
**
 		** similar 3 6.8 (3.9, 11.4) 1.3
**
Martin County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Marshall County
**
 		** similar 4 6.5 (3.9, 10.2) 1.3
**
Marion County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 5.1 (4.5, 5.8) 1.0 -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 5.9 (4.3, 7.9) 1.1 -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Lawrence County 8 falling falling trend similar 3 5.1 (2.9, 8.4) 1.0 -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 34 5.5 (4.7, 6.4) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
LaPorte County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 6.0 (4.3, 8.1) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
LaGrange County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kosciusko County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 6.1 (4.1, 8.7) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Knox County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 6.8 (5.1, 8.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Jennings County
**
 		** similar 3 10.1 (5.7, 16.8) 2.0
**
Jefferson County
**
 		** similar 3 8.1 (4.7, 13.3) 1.6
**
Jay County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jasper County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 5 8.9 (5.7, 13.3) 1.7 -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Huntington County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 6.6 (3.8, 10.9) 1.3 -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 4.4 (2.8, 6.6) 0.9 -3.1 (-5.2, -1.0)
Henry County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 8.1 (5.4, 11.9) 1.6 -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Hendricks County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 5.5 (4.0, 7.3) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Harrison County
**
 		** similar 3 6.7 (3.9, 10.9) 1.3
**
Hancock County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 5.2 (3.3, 7.9) 1.0 -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Hamilton County 9 falling falling trend lower 12 4.0 (3.0, 5.2) 0.8 -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Greene County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 6.3 (3.6, 10.7) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 6.7 (4.6, 9.7) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Gibson County
**
 		** higher 4 9.2 (5.7, 14.4) 1.8
**
Fulton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Franklin County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Fountain County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Floyd County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 5.2 (3.3, 7.8) 1.0 -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Fayette County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Elkhart County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 5.8 (4.5, 7.5) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Dubois County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 7.9 (4.9, 12.0) 1.5 -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Delaware County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 7.8 (5.9, 10.2) 1.5 -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Decatur County
**
 		** higher 4 12.0 (7.2, 19.0) 2.3
**
Dearborn County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
DeKalb County 4 stable stable trend higher 5 9.2 (5.8, 13.9) 1.8 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Daviess County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Crawford County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Clinton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Clay County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Clark County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 5.2 (3.5, 7.3) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.3, -1.4)
Cass County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Carroll County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Brown County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Boone County
**
 		** similar 4 6.0 (3.7, 9.1) 1.2
**
Blackford County
**
 		** higher 3 16.6 (9.5, 28.1) 3.2
**
Benton County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Bartholomew County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 4.9 (3.1, 7.4) 1.0 -6.0 (-8.6, -3.3)
Allen County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 5.8 (4.8, 7.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Adams County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 7:21 am.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Adams County, Benton County, Brown County, Carroll County, Cass County, Clay County, Clinton County, Crawford County, Daviess County, Dearborn County, Fayette County, Fountain County, Franklin County, Fulton County, Jasper County, Jay County, Knox County, LaGrange County, Martin County, Montgomery County, Newton County, Noble County, Ohio County, Orange County, Owen County, Parke County, Perry County, Pike County, Posey County, Pulaski County, Randolph County, Ripley County, Rush County, Scott County, Shelby County, Spencer County, Starke County, Steuben County, Sullivan County, Switzerland County, Tipton County, Union County, Vermillion County, Warren County, Washington County, Wells County, White County, Whitley County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Blackford County, Boone County, Decatur County, Gibson County, Harrison County, Jefferson County, Jennings County, Marshall County, Miami County, Putnam County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top