Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Michigan Counties versus United States

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 20,291 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) - -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Michigan - falling falling trend - 754 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) - -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
Hillsdale County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 8.9 (5.9, 13.0) 1.7 -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Ionia County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 8.3 (5.5, 11.9) 1.6 -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Calhoun County 5 falling falling trend higher 13 7.8 (6.0, 10.0) 1.5 -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Kalamazoo County 5 falling falling trend higher 21 7.2 (5.9, 8.7) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Macomb County 5 falling falling trend higher 69 6.1 (5.4, 6.8) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Muskegon County 5 falling falling trend higher 15 7.0 (5.5, 8.9) 1.4 -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Barry County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 6.0 (3.9, 9.1) 1.2 -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Bay County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 5.8 (4.2, 7.9) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Branch County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 6.7 (4.0, 10.7) 1.3 -0.6 (-2.8, 1.6)
Lapeer County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 6.1 (4.2, 8.6) 1.2 -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Lenawee County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 6.3 (4.5, 8.6) 1.2 -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Marquette County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 5.5 (3.4, 8.5) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Mecosta County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 7.1 (4.4, 11.2) 1.4 -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Sanilac County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 5.3 (3.1, 8.8) 1.0 -1.6 (-3.6, 0.3)
Van Buren County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 4.9 (3.1, 7.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Allegan County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 1.2 -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Berrien County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 4.8 (3.6, 6.3) 0.9 -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 5.6 (3.4, 9.0) 1.1 -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Clinton County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 6.4 (4.3, 9.2) 1.2 -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Eaton County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 6.2 (4.5, 8.3) 1.2 -4.0 (-6.0, -2.0)
Genesee County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 6.0 (5.1, 7.1) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Grand Traverse County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 5.5 (3.8, 7.7) 1.1 -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Gratiot County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 6.6 (3.9, 10.7) 1.3 -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Ingham County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 5.7 (4.5, 7.1) 1.1 -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Jackson County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 6.7 (5.2, 8.5) 1.3 -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Kent County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 5.7 (4.9, 6.6) 1.1 -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Livingston County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 6.4 (5.0, 8.1) 1.2 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Midland County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 5.7 (3.9, 8.2) 1.1 -3.6 (-5.2, -2.0)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 6.2 (4.7, 8.0) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Montcalm County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 6.1 (3.9, 9.2) 1.2 -3.8 (-5.7, -1.9)
Newaygo County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 5.7 (3.4, 9.1) 1.1 -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Oakland County 8 falling falling trend similar 88 5.5 (5.0, 6.0) 1.1 -2.1 (-2.6, -1.7)
Ottawa County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 6.3 (5.1, 7.6) 1.2 -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Saginaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 5.7 (4.4, 7.2) 1.1 -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
St. Clair County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 6.6 (5.2, 8.4) 1.3 -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
St. Joseph County 8 falling falling trend similar 4 5.3 (3.2, 8.3) 1.0 -2.2 (-4.1, -0.4)
Tuscola County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 7.0 (4.6, 10.4) 1.4 -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Washtenaw County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 5.1 (4.2, 6.3) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Wayne County 8 falling falling trend similar 113 5.5 (5.1, 6.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Alpena County
**
** higher 4 9.7 (5.7, 15.9) 1.9
**
Charlevoix County
**
** similar 3 6.7 (3.8, 11.8) 1.3
**
Cheboygan County
**
** higher 5 10.2 (6.6, 15.9) 2.0
**
Chippewa County
**
** similar 4 8.2 (4.9, 13.0) 1.6
**
Clare County
**
** similar 4 7.0 (4.1, 11.7) 1.4
**
Emmet County
**
** similar 4 7.1 (4.3, 11.5) 1.4
**
Gladwin County
**
** similar 3 7.2 (4.0, 12.7) 1.4
**
Huron County
**
** higher 5 9.8 (6.2, 15.1) 1.9
**
Isabella County
**
** similar 4 5.0 (2.9, 8.1) 1.0
**
Mason County
**
** similar 4 7.7 (4.6, 12.6) 1.5
**
Shiawassee County
**
** similar 6 6.2 (4.1, 9.1) 1.2
**
Alcona County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Alger County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Antrim County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Arenac County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Baraga County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Benzie County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Crawford County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Delta County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dickinson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gogebic County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Houghton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iosco County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Iron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kalkaska County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Keweenaw County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Leelanau County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Luce County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Mackinac County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Manistee County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Menominee County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Missaukee County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Montmorency County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Oceana County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ogemaw County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Ontonagon County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Osceola County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Oscoda County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Otsego County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Presque Isle County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Roscommon County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Schoolcraft County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wexford County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/06/2024 11:41 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Alcona County, Alger County, Antrim County, Arenac County, Baraga County, Benzie County, Crawford County, Delta County, Dickinson County, Gogebic County, Houghton County, Iosco County, Iron County, Kalkaska County, Keweenaw County, Lake County, Leelanau County, Luce County, Mackinac County, Manistee County, Menominee County, Missaukee County, Montmorency County, Oceana County, Ogemaw County, Ontonagon County, Osceola County, Oscoda County, Otsego County, Presque Isle County, Roscommon County, Schoolcraft County, Wexford County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Alpena County, Charlevoix County, Cheboygan County, Chippewa County, Clare County, Emmet County, Gladwin County, Huron County, Isabella County, Mason County, Shiawassee County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top