Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

New York Counties versus United States

Leukemia

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate ascending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 23,447 6.0 (6.0, 6.1) - -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
New York - falling falling trend - 1,378 5.6 (5.5, 5.8) - -2.7 (-3.8, -1.7)
Delaware County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 8.8 (5.8, 13.1) 1.5 -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Chemung County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 8.6 (6.3, 11.6) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Herkimer County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 8.0 (5.5, 11.3) 1.3 -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Montgomery County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 7.9 (5.0, 12.0) 1.3 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Niagara County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 7.6 (6.3, 9.2) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Warren County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 7.2 (5.0, 10.1) 1.2 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Oswego County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 7.1 (5.2, 9.5) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Oneida County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 7.0 (5.7, 8.5) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Ontario County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 6.9 (5.3, 9.1) 1.2 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Clinton County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 6.9 (4.8, 9.7) 1.1 -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 6.8 (4.9, 9.3) 1.1 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Franklin County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 6.8 (4.1, 10.5) 1.1 9.5 (-8.5, 31.1)
Erie County 5 falling falling trend higher 84 6.7 (6.1, 7.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Richmond County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 6.5 (5.6, 7.5) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Putnam County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 6.5 (4.6, 8.9) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Rockland County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 6.4 (5.3, 7.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ulster County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 6.4 (5.0, 8.0) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Greene County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 6.4 (4.1, 9.8) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
St. Lawrence County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 6.2 (4.4, 8.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Steuben County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 6.2 (4.4, 8.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 6.2 (4.3, 8.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Monroe County 8 falling falling trend similar 59 6.1 (5.4, 6.9) 1.0 -4.0 (-7.0, -1.0)
Tompkins County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 6.1 (4.2, 8.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Sullivan County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 6.0 (4.1, 8.7) 1.0 -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Onondaga County 6 stable stable trend similar 36 6.0 (5.2, 7.0) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Chenango County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 6.0 (3.6, 9.6) 1.0 -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Albany County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 5.9 (4.9, 7.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Saratoga County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 5.9 (4.7, 7.3) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Essex County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 5.9 (3.6, 9.6) 1.0 -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Suffolk County 8 falling falling trend similar 112 5.9 (5.4, 6.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Chautauqua County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 5.9 (4.4, 7.8) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Fulton County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 5.8 (3.5, 9.2) 1.0 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
Otsego County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 5.8 (3.5, 9.2) 1.0 -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Dutchess County 8 falling falling trend similar 23 5.8 (4.7, 7.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Nassau County 8 falling falling trend similar 110 5.8 (5.3, 6.3) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Schenectady County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 5.8 (4.4, 7.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Broome County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 5.6 (4.3, 7.1) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Westchester County 8 falling falling trend similar 72 5.5 (4.9, 6.1) 0.9 -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Genesee County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 5.4 (3.3, 8.5) 0.9 -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Livingston County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 5.4 (3.4, 8.3) 0.9 -1.4 (-3.4, 0.6)
Cayuga County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 5.1 (3.3, 7.6) 0.8 -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
New York County 9 falling falling trend lower 101 5.0 (4.6, 5.5) 0.8 -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Queens County 9 falling falling trend lower 138 5.0 (4.6, 5.4) 0.8 -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Bronx County 9 falling falling trend lower 73 4.9 (4.4, 5.5) 0.8 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Rensselaer County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 4.9 (3.6, 6.5) 0.8 -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Orange County 9 falling falling trend lower 19 4.7 (3.8, 5.7) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Kings County 7 stable stable trend lower 127 4.6 (4.2, 5.0) 0.8 -8.6 (-19.5, 3.7)
Cattaraugus County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 4.4 (2.9, 6.7) 0.7 -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Columbia County 7 stable stable trend lower 4 3.9 (2.2, 6.4) 0.6 -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Allegany County
**
** similar 4 6.4 (3.8, 10.3) 1.1
**
Cortland County
**
** similar 4 6.6 (4.0, 10.5) 1.1
**
Madison County
**
** similar 6 6.1 (4.0, 9.0) 1.0
**
Orleans County
**
** similar 4 7.2 (4.2, 11.7) 1.2
**
Schoharie County
**
** similar 3 7.3 (4.2, 12.3) 1.2
**
Seneca County
**
** similar 4 8.4 (5.0, 13.5) 1.4
**
Tioga County
**
** similar 3 4.6 (2.7, 7.7) 0.8
**
Washington County
**
** similar 6 6.9 (4.6, 10.1) 1.1
**
Hamilton County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lewis County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Schuyler County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wyoming County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Yates County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 1:41 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Hamilton County, Lewis County, Schuyler County, Wyoming County, Yates County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Allegany County, Cortland County, Madison County, Orleans County, Schoharie County, Seneca County, Tioga County, Washington County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top