Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 10.4 (10.0, 10.8) N/A 549 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.8, 7.0)
Utah Yes 15.6 (14.9, 16.2) 51 (51, 51) 447 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.3)
New Mexico Yes 21.4 (20.7, 22.2) 50 (49, 50) 613 falling falling trend -5.2 (-6.3, -4.3)
Colorado Yes 22.3 (21.7, 22.8) 49 (49, 50) 1,422 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.8, -3.9)
California Yes 23.2 (23.0, 23.4) 48 (47, 48) 10,501 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.7, -3.8)
Hawaii 8 Yes 23.9 (23.0, 24.9) 47 (46, 48) 506 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -1.8)
Idaho No 26.1 (25.1, 27.1) 46 (41, 46) 588 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.6, -4.0)
Arizona No 26.3 (25.9, 26.8) 45 (42, 46) 2,567 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.3, -4.2)
District of Columbia No 26.6 (24.9, 28.5) 44 (38, 47) 178 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -3.7)
New Jersey No 26.8 (26.3, 27.2) 43 (41, 46) 3,207 falling falling trend -5.3 (-5.9, -4.9)
New York No 26.9 (26.6, 27.1) 42 (41, 45) 7,113 falling falling trend -5.1 (-5.3, -5.0)
Montana No 28.2 (27.0, 29.4) 41 (35, 44) 439 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.2, -3.5)
Connecticut No 28.3 (27.6, 29.0) 40 (38, 42) 1,391 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.3, -3.2)
Wyoming No 28.4 (26.7, 30.2) 39 (32, 46) 214 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.6)
Texas No 29.1 (28.8, 29.4) 38 (36, 40) 8,583 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.7, -3.6)
Minnesota No 29.7 (29.1, 30.2) 37 (33, 39) 2,154 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.0, -3.6)
Washington No 29.8 (29.3, 30.3) 36 (33, 39) 2,765 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.8, -4.0)
Maryland No 29.9 (29.4, 30.5) 35 (32, 38) 2,314 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.1, -4.4)
North Dakota No 30.5 (28.9, 32.2) 34 (25, 40) 287 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.3, -2.6)
Massachusetts No 30.6 (30.1, 31.2) 33 (30, 36) 2,832 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.1, -4.1)
Nevada No 31.2 (30.4, 32.0) 32 (26, 35) 1,177 falling falling trend -6.0 (-7.5, -4.9)
Oregon No 31.2 (30.6, 31.9) 31 (27, 34) 1,789 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.4, -4.0)
Nebraska No 31.7 (30.7, 32.8) 30 (24, 34) 773 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -3.0)
Alaska No 31.8 (29.9, 33.8) 29 (19, 38) 228 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.0, -3.9)
Florida No 31.8 (31.5, 32.1) 28 (26, 32) 10,845 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.7, -4.1)
Vermont No 32.2 (30.5, 33.8) 27 (19, 36) 313 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -3.1)
Wisconsin No 32.5 (31.9, 33.1) 26 (23, 30) 2,592 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.5, -3.5)
New Hampshire No 33.0 (31.9, 34.2) 25 (19, 31) 659 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.6, -3.4)
Rhode Island No 33.0 (31.7, 34.4) 24 (18, 32) 500 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.6, -4.4)
Virginia No 33.2 (32.7, 33.7) 23 (22, 27) 3,567 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.6, -3.6)
South Dakota No 34.0 (32.5, 35.6) 22 (16, 29) 395 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.4)
Georgia No 34.2 (33.8, 34.7) 21 (17, 23) 4,162 falling falling trend -4.7 (-5.5, -4.2)
Pennsylvania No 34.3 (33.9, 34.7) 20 (17, 23) 6,403 falling falling trend -4.2 (-4.7, -3.9)
Illinois No 34.4 (34.0, 34.9) 19 (17, 23) 5,544 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.0, -4.1)
Iowa No 35.0 (34.2, 35.8) 18 (16, 22) 1,499 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.1, -3.6)
Delaware No 35.5 (34.1, 36.9) 17 (15, 23) 515 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.6)
Kansas No 36.4 (35.5, 37.3) 16 (14, 18) 1,342 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.5)
South Carolina No 37.5 (36.8, 38.1) 15 (13, 16) 2,645 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -3.5)
North Carolina No 37.7 (37.2, 38.1) 14 (13, 16) 5,062 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.1, -3.6)
Michigan No 38.3 (37.8, 38.8) 13 (12, 15) 5,255 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -3.2)
Ohio No 39.8 (39.4, 40.3) 12 (9, 12) 6,333 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.0, -3.5)
Maine No 40.1 (38.9, 41.3) 11 (9, 13) 874 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.0, -3.1)
Louisiana No 40.5 (39.8, 41.3) 10 (9, 12) 2,344 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.7)
Alabama No 40.5 (39.8, 41.2) 9 (9, 12) 2,726 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.3, -3.7)
Indiana No 42.1 (41.5, 42.8) 8 (7, 8) 3,595 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.7)
Missouri No 42.3 (41.7, 42.9) 7 (7, 8) 3,472 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -3.3)
Tennessee No 44.1 (43.4, 44.7) 6 (5, 6) 3,947 falling falling trend -4.0 (-4.8, -3.5)
Oklahoma No 45.3 (44.4, 46.1) 5 (4, 6) 2,216 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.2)
Arkansas No 45.6 (44.7, 46.6) 4 (3, 6) 1,825 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -3.1)
Mississippi No 47.5 (46.5, 48.5) 3 (2, 4) 1,788 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.6)
West Virginia No 49.1 (47.9, 50.4) 2 (1, 3) 1,342 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -1.0)
Kentucky No 50.9 (50.0, 51.7) 1 (1, 2) 2,986 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.4, -3.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 11:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top