Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi *** 51.4 (50.3, 52.4) N/A 1,864 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Kemper County *** 34.3 (21.8, 52.4) 81 (21, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Lamar County *** 35.9 (29.6, 43.3) 80 (56, 81) 23 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.6, -4.0)
Noxubee County *** 36.2 (23.0, 54.7) 79 (17, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Lafayette County *** 36.8 (29.6, 45.3) 78 (51, 81) 19 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Benton County *** 37.3 (23.6, 57.4) 77 (10, 81) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.7, -2.1)
Rankin County *** 38.5 (34.5, 42.8) 76 (60, 81) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lauderdale County *** 39.2 (33.8, 45.3) 75 (52, 81) 39 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.8, -3.7)
Oktibbeha County *** 39.4 (31.2, 49.1) 74 (36, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Carroll County *** 40.3 (28.1, 57.4) 73 (11, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Greene County *** 40.7 (28.0, 57.6) 72 (11, 81) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Hinds County *** 41.9 (38.3, 45.6) 71 (53, 78) 110 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Jefferson Davis County *** 42.8 (30.1, 60.0) 70 (8, 81) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Attala County *** 43.3 (33.0, 56.4) 69 (14, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Choctaw County *** 44.0 (29.3, 64.9) 68 (5, 81) 6
*
*
Wayne County *** 45.4 (34.6, 58.8) 67 (11, 81) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Leake County *** 45.6 (34.9, 58.7) 66 (11, 81) 13 falling falling trend -6.2 (-11.2, -0.8)
Walthall County *** 45.7 (33.6, 61.4) 65 (7, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Clay County *** 45.8 (34.8, 59.5) 64 (9, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Neshoba County *** 46.1 (36.5, 57.5) 63 (10, 81) 17 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.1, -0.4)
Jones County *** 47.2 (40.8, 54.3) 62 (23, 78) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Calhoun County *** 47.4 (34.5, 63.8) 61 (6, 81) 9 falling falling trend -8.8 (-16.7, -0.3)
Coahoma County *** 47.8 (36.8, 61.2) 60 (9, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Amite County *** 47.9 (35.3, 64.5) 59 (6, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Montgomery County *** 48.3 (33.4, 68.5) 58 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Pike County *** 49.1 (40.7, 58.8) 57 (12, 78) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Smith County *** 49.2 (37.0, 64.7) 56 (4, 81) 11 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.6, -2.9)
Winston County *** 49.7 (38.1, 64.1) 55 (5, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Jasper County *** 49.8 (38.1, 64.6) 54 (5, 81) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Adams County *** 49.9 (40.9, 60.4) 53 (11, 78) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pontotoc County *** 49.9 (40.1, 61.4) 52 (9, 79) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Leflore County *** 50.6 (40.2, 63.0) 51 (7, 80) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Simpson County *** 50.8 (40.6, 63.0) 50 (6, 78) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Tate County *** 51.0 (40.8, 63.1) 49 (6, 79) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Bolivar County *** 51.1 (41.3, 62.7) 48 (6, 78) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Jackson County *** 51.2 (46.5, 56.4) 47 (20, 66) 88 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Perry County *** 52.5 (38.2, 71.2) 46 (2, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Itawamba County *** 52.5 (41.8, 65.5) 45 (4, 77) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Pearl River County *** 52.7 (45.5, 60.8) 44 (10, 70) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Newton County *** 52.7 (41.0, 66.9) 43 (4, 79) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Alcorn County *** 52.8 (44.2, 62.9) 42 (7, 72) 27 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.5)
Hancock County *** 53.2 (45.6, 61.9) 41 (9, 71) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Copiah County *** 53.5 (43.3, 65.6) 40 (5, 75) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Monroe County *** 53.5 (44.8, 63.6) 39 (7, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Warren County *** 53.6 (45.4, 63.0) 38 (6, 72) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Marion County *** 54.2 (43.5, 67.0) 37 (3, 77) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Lowndes County *** 54.6 (47.1, 63.0) 36 (6, 66) 39 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Stone County *** 54.6 (41.4, 71.0) 35 (1, 79) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Sharkey County *** 54.7 (32.2, 89.5) 34 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Chickasaw County *** 55.1 (42.0, 71.1) 33 (2, 78) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Covington County *** 55.7 (43.2, 71.1) 32 (2, 77) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Madison County *** 56.0 (49.5, 63.1) 31 (8, 61) 58 falling falling trend -7.6 (-9.1, -6.1)
George County *** 56.1 (43.9, 70.8) 30 (2, 75) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Webster County *** 56.3 (39.3, 78.8) 29 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Scott County *** 56.7 (45.8, 69.6) 28 (3, 72) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Tallahatchie County *** 56.7 (41.5, 76.0) 27 (1, 80) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Prentiss County *** 57.1 (46.4, 69.7) 26 (2, 71) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Franklin County *** 57.2 (39.1, 82.1) 25 (1, 81) 7
*
*
Lee County *** 57.3 (50.7, 64.5) 24 (7, 59) 56 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.4, -2.6)
DeSoto County *** 57.4 (52.4, 62.7) 23 (9, 54) 102 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Harrison County *** 57.6 (53.2, 62.1) 22 (9, 49) 137 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Forrest County *** 57.8 (50.4, 66.0) 21 (5, 60) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Marshall County *** 58.3 (48.9, 69.2) 20 (3, 66) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Union County *** 58.3 (47.5, 71.0) 19 (2, 71) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Jefferson County *** 58.4 (37.4, 87.5) 18 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Wilkinson County *** 58.9 (40.3, 83.8) 17 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Clarke County *** 59.2 (46.0, 75.5) 16 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Lawrence County *** 59.5 (43.8, 79.6) 15 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Quitman County *** 60.4 (40.5, 87.8) 14 (1, 80) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Lincoln County *** 61.2 (51.2, 72.7) 13 (2, 62) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Tishomingo County *** 62.6 (50.1, 77.7) 12 (1, 69) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Holmes County *** 63.3 (48.8, 81.0) 11 (1, 71) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Grenada County *** 63.6 (51.0, 78.7) 10 (1, 69) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Washington County *** 64.1 (54.9, 74.5) 9 (1, 53) 37 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Panola County *** 64.2 (53.8, 76.2) 8 (1, 55) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Tippah County *** 64.9 (51.9, 80.3) 7 (1, 62) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Claiborne County *** 68.3 (47.2, 96.1) 6 (1, 79) 7 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.7)
Humphreys County *** 70.3 (49.6, 97.5) 5 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Sunflower County *** 70.6 (57.1, 86.4) 4 (1, 55) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Tunica County *** 70.8 (48.8, 99.2) 3 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Yazoo County *** 73.8 (60.4, 89.2) 2 (1, 39) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Yalobusha County *** 78.1 (60.7, 99.6) 1 (1, 48) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Issaquena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2021 3:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top