Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 84.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 2.2 (2.2, 2.2) N/A 4,191 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.6)
Massachusetts Yes 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) 51 (44, 51) 48 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -2.9)
Minnesota Yes 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 50 (42, 51) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Maine Yes 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 49 (34, 51) 11
*
*
North Dakota Yes 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) 48 (25, 51) 5
*
*
Connecticut Yes 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 47 (40, 51) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Rhode Island Yes 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 46 (24, 51) 8
*
*
New Hampshire Yes 1.4 (1.1, 1.9) 45 (24, 51) 13
*
*
Montana Yes 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) 44 (19, 51) 9
*
*
Wisconsin Yes 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) 43 (35, 49) 53 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Vermont Yes 1.5 (1.0, 2.2) 42 (13, 51) 6
*
*
Colorado Yes 1.5 (1.4, 1.8) 41 (32, 48) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Alaska Yes 1.7 (1.1, 2.4) 40 (11, 51) 6
*
*
Iowa Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) 39 (21, 48) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Utah Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) 38 (20, 48) 25
*
*
Hawaii 8 Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.2) 37 (15, 50) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Washington Yes 1.8 (1.6, 1.9) 36 (24, 44) 74 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Idaho Yes 1.8 (1.4, 2.2) 35 (14, 48) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
South Dakota Yes 1.8 (1.3, 2.5) 34 (8, 51) 9
*
*
Virginia Yes 1.9 (1.7, 2.0) 33 (22, 42) 93 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.0)
Oregon Yes 1.9 (1.7, 2.2) 32 (17, 43) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
New York Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.0) 31 (21, 38) 237 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.8, -2.6)
North Carolina Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.1) 30 (20, 39) 121 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Michigan Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.1) 29 (20, 39) 114 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Wyoming Yes 2.0 (1.3, 2.8) 28 (4, 51) 6
*
*
Arizona Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 27 (18, 40) 79 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.4, 0.4)
Pennsylvania Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.1) 26 (20, 38) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Maryland Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 25 (16, 40) 74 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
New Jersey Yes 2.0 (1.9, 2.2) 24 (16, 36) 116 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Nebraska Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.5) 23 (9, 42) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Illinois Yes 2.1 (2.0, 2.3) 22 (14, 32) 163 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Delaware Yes 2.2 (1.7, 2.8) 21 (5, 45) 14
*
*
California Yes 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) 20 (15, 26) 484 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Ohio Yes 2.2 (2.1, 2.4) 19 (13, 28) 157 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Georgia Yes 2.3 (2.1, 2.5) 18 (11, 25) 138 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
South Carolina Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.6) 17 (8, 28) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Kansas Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.8) 16 (5, 33) 37 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 7.7)
Missouri Yes 2.4 (2.2, 2.7) 15 (7, 25) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
New Mexico Yes 2.4 (2.0, 2.9) 14 (3, 35) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Nevada Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.8) 13 (5, 32) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
District of Columbia Yes 2.4 (1.8, 3.3) 12 (1, 44) 9
*
*
Florida Yes 2.7 (2.5, 2.8) 11 (6, 15) 356 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Kentucky Yes 2.7 (2.4, 3.0) 10 (3, 19) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Indiana Yes 2.7 (2.5, 3.0) 9 (4, 17) 99 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Tennessee Yes 2.7 (2.5, 3.0) 8 (3, 17) 109 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Texas Yes 2.8 (2.7, 3.0) 7 (4, 12) 418 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
West Virginia Yes 2.9 (2.5, 3.5) 6 (1, 21) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Louisiana Yes 3.0 (2.7, 3.3) 5 (1, 13) 78 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Alabama Yes 3.1 (2.8, 3.4) 4 (1, 11) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Arkansas Yes 3.2 (2.8, 3.6) 3 (1, 12) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Mississippi Yes 3.4 (3.0, 3.8) 2 (1, 9) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Oklahoma Yes 3.6 (3.2, 4.0) 1 (1, 5) 76 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.0)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) N/A 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-15.1, 17.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 12:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top