Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 84.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 2.2 (2.2, 2.2) N/A 4,196 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.8, -0.5)
Alabama Yes 3.2 (3.0, 3.6) 3 (1, 8) 100 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.7)
Alaska Yes 1.9 (1.3, 2.7) 29 (4, 51) 7
*
*
Arizona Yes 2.1 (1.9, 2.4) 23 (14, 34) 86 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 6.0)
Arkansas Yes 3.2 (2.8, 3.6) 4 (1, 13) 54 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
California Yes 2.1 (2.0, 2.2) 24 (17, 30) 469 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 1.4)
Colorado Yes 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) 42 (34, 50) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Connecticut Yes 1.5 (1.2, 1.7) 43 (33, 51) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Delaware Yes 1.9 (1.4, 2.5) 31 (11, 50) 12
*
*
District of Columbia Yes 2.2 (1.6, 3.0) 20 (2, 48) 8
*
*
Florida Yes 2.7 (2.6, 2.8) 10 (5, 16) 367 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 1.3)
Georgia Yes 2.3 (2.2, 2.5) 17 (11, 25) 142 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Hawaii 8 Yes 1.9 (1.5, 2.3) 32 (13, 49) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Idaho Yes 1.8 (1.4, 2.2) 37 (16, 49) 18
*
*
Illinois Yes 2.1 (2.0, 2.3) 22 (16, 32) 162 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Indiana Yes 2.8 (2.5, 3.0) 9 (4, 17) 103 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.9)
Iowa Yes 1.6 (1.3, 1.9) 41 (27, 50) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Kansas Yes 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) 14 (4, 30) 38 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 15.8)
Kentucky Yes 2.9 (2.6, 3.2) 6 (2, 16) 75 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 4.9)
Louisiana Yes 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) 7 (3, 18) 72 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Maine Yes 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) 44 (25, 51) 12
*
*
Maryland Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 25 (17, 39) 75 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 4.6)
Massachusetts Yes 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) 51 (45, 51) 50 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 7.5)
Michigan Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 28 (19, 38) 117 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 2.0)
Minnesota Yes 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 50 (39, 51) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Mississippi Yes 3.6 (3.2, 4.0) 1 (1, 6) 63 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Missouri Yes 2.5 (2.2, 2.7) 15 (6, 24) 88 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 1.7)
Montana Yes 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) 47 (25, 51) 9
*
*
Nebraska Yes 1.9 (1.6, 2.4) 30 (12, 47) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Nevada Yes 2.6 (2.3, 3.0) 11 (4, 23) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
New Hampshire Yes 1.3 (1.0, 1.8) 46 (29, 51) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.9)
New Jersey Yes 1.8 (1.6, 2.0) 36 (24, 43) 105 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
New Mexico Yes 2.4 (2.0, 2.8) 16 (5, 37) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
New York Yes 1.7 (1.6, 1.8) 39 (30, 43) 215 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -3.5)
North Carolina Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 26 (18, 37) 127 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 4.2)
North Dakota Yes 1.3 (0.9, 2.0) 49 (20, 51) 6
*
*
Ohio Yes 2.3 (2.1, 2.4) 19 (13, 28) 157 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 2.0)
Oklahoma Yes 3.5 (3.1, 3.9) 2 (1, 6) 73 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 7.1)
Oregon Yes 1.8 (1.6, 2.1) 33 (20, 44) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Pennsylvania Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.1) 27 (19, 37) 160 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.6)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 2.2 (1.9, 2.6) N/A 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-14.9, 15.9)
Rhode Island Yes 1.3 (0.9, 1.8) 48 (25, 51) 9
*
*
South Carolina Yes 2.5 (2.3, 2.8) 13 (5, 23) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 2.8)
South Dakota Yes 2.2 (1.6, 2.9) 21 (3, 48) 10
*
*
Tennessee Yes 2.6 (2.3, 2.8) 12 (6, 21) 103 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Texas Yes 2.8 (2.7, 2.9) 8 (4, 14) 417 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 3.4)
Utah Yes 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 34 (17, 47) 27 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.7, 21.9)
Vermont Yes 1.7 (1.1, 2.4) 40 (9, 51) 7
*
*
Virginia Yes 1.8 (1.7, 2.0) 35 (22, 42) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 8.4)
Washington Yes 1.7 (1.6, 1.9) 38 (26, 44) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
West Virginia Yes 3.0 (2.5, 3.5) 5 (1, 19) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.9)
Wisconsin Yes 1.4 (1.2, 1.6) 45 (38, 51) 49 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.5, 3.8)
Wyoming Yes 2.3 (1.6, 3.2) 18 (1, 49) 7
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 10:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top