Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS), 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States *** 4.7 (4.7, 4.8) 9,758 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.6)
Nevada *** 3.9 (3.4, 4.3) 64 stable stable trend 12.5 (-4.1, 32.0)
Louisiana *** 4.4 (4.0, 4.7) 125 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.5, 10.2)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 4.8 (4.4, 5.2) 117 stable stable trend 5.8 (-6.3, 19.5)
Georgia *** 4.8 (4.6, 5.1) 281 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.4, 7.3)
Oregon *** 4.8 (4.5, 5.2) 129 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.9, 6.7)
Tennessee *** 4.3 (4.0, 4.5) 185 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.6, 7.4)
Texas *** 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) 594 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.3, 6.1)
Illinois *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.7) 455 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.6, 4.1)
Arizona *** 3.8 (3.5, 4.0) 163 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 4.1)
California *** 4.7 (4.6, 4.9) 1,073 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.0)
Florida *** 4.3 (4.1, 4.4) 661 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 2.8)
Hawaii 8 *** 4.3 (3.7, 5.0) 40 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.7, 2.7)
New York *** 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) 778 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.0)
Idaho *** 4.8 (4.2, 5.5) 47 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.5)
Delaware *** 6.1 (5.2, 7.0) 40 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.4)
Maryland *** 5.7 (5.3, 6.0) 219 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.8)
Ohio *** 5.0 (4.8, 5.3) 408 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
District of Columbia *** 8.0 (6.8, 9.5) 30 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Mississippi *** 4.2 (3.8, 4.6) 79 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.5, 1.5)
New Hampshire *** 4.8 (4.2, 5.5) 44 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.9)
Oklahoma *** 4.2 (3.8, 4.6) 102 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Michigan *** 5.1 (4.9, 5.4) 349 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.1)
New Jersey *** 5.6 (5.4, 5.9) 342 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.0)
Pennsylvania *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.8) 526 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.0)
Rhode Island *** 4.9 (4.2, 5.7) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Washington *** 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) 195 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.2)
Indiana *** 5.2 (4.9, 5.5) 220 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.0)
Maine *** 4.6 (4.0, 5.2) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.5)
Minnesota *** 4.4 (4.1, 4.8) 154 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Virginia *** 4.7 (4.4, 5.0) 242 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 1.0)
West Virginia *** 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 65 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Colorado *** 3.9 (3.6, 4.3) 119 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Connecticut *** 4.3 (4.0, 4.7) 112 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Iowa *** 5.1 (4.6, 5.5) 110 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
North Carolina *** 4.6 (4.4, 4.9) 301 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 0.9)
South Carolina *** 4.7 (4.4, 5.1) 155 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
South Dakota *** 4.0 (3.2, 4.8) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Wisconsin *** 5.0 (4.7, 5.4) 195 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Massachusetts *** 4.6 (4.3, 4.9) 215 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
Vermont *** 4.9 (4.0, 5.9) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Alabama *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.8) 114 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
New Mexico *** 4.0 (3.6, 4.6) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Utah *** 4.3 (3.8, 4.8) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Arkansas *** 3.9 (3.5, 4.3) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Kansas *** 4.2 (3.8, 4.7) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Kentucky *** 4.2 (3.8, 4.5) 120 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Missouri *** 4.5 (4.3, 4.9) 186 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.4)
Montana *** 4.2 (3.6, 5.0) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Nebraska *** 4.6 (4.0, 5.2) 54 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
North Dakota *** 4.2 (3.4, 5.2) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.6)
Alaska *** 3.7 (2.8, 4.9) 12
*
*
Wyoming *** 3.8 (2.9, 4.8) 13
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2020 3:12 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top