Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama No 166.9 (165.4, 168.3) N/A 10,437 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Wilcox County No 212.6 (179.6, 250.5) 1 (1, 49) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Crenshaw County No 211.0 (182.3, 243.5) 2 (1, 42) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Walker County No 205.4 (192.0, 219.5) 3 (1, 22) 185 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Macon County No 204.3 (179.2, 232.3) 4 (1, 46) 53 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Lowndes County No 202.1 (169.0, 240.4) 5 (1, 57) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Russell County No 200.1 (184.7, 216.5) 6 (1, 32) 130 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Sumter County No 199.9 (168.2, 236.2) 7 (1, 60) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Escambia County No 198.1 (180.6, 216.9) 8 (1, 38) 98 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Jackson County No 197.1 (182.6, 212.5) 9 (1, 33) 147 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Dallas County No 194.7 (177.5, 213.4) 10 (1, 40) 100 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Covington County No 192.5 (176.4, 209.8) 11 (1, 42) 112 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Fayette County No 190.7 (166.5, 217.9) 12 (1, 56) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Barbour County No 190.4 (170.0, 212.7) 13 (1, 54) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Bullock County No 188.8 (156.1, 226.7) 14 (1, 65) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Marengo County No 188.7 (165.7, 214.4) 15 (1, 60) 52 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Clarke County No 188.3 (168.2, 210.6) 16 (1, 54) 67 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Talladega County No 187.6 (176.0, 199.8) 17 (4, 39) 205 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Geneva County No 187.2 (168.1, 208.0) 18 (1, 52) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Blount County No 186.4 (172.8, 200.7) 19 (3, 44) 146 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Bibb County No 186.1 (163.8, 210.7) 20 (1, 60) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Tallapoosa County No 183.0 (167.5, 199.8) 21 (3, 51) 113 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pike County No 181.6 (162.1, 202.9) 22 (2, 59) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Calhoun County No 181.4 (171.7, 191.6) 23 (8, 44) 273 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Chambers County No 181.4 (164.3, 199.9) 24 (3, 55) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Marion County No 181.1 (163.7, 200.0) 25 (3, 57) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Lamar County No 180.8 (155.5, 209.5) 26 (1, 65) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lawrence County No 180.8 (163.5, 199.5) 27 (3, 58) 84 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Colbert County No 177.9 (164.8, 191.9) 28 (8, 53) 143 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Etowah County No 177.2 (167.3, 187.5) 29 (11, 49) 254 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Perry County No 176.5 (143.7, 215.2) 30 (1, 67) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Clay County No 175.7 (150.3, 204.8) 31 (2, 66) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
St. Clair County No 175.4 (164.4, 187.1) 32 (11, 53) 196 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Henry County No 174.4 (152.1, 199.6) 33 (3, 66) 47 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Franklin County No 174.1 (155.9, 194.0) 34 (5, 64) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Mobile County No 173.8 (168.6, 179.1) 35 (21, 45) 889 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Elmore County No 172.3 (160.6, 184.8) 36 (13, 56) 166 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Conecuh County No 171.7 (145.8, 201.6) 37 (2, 66) 34 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Morgan County No 171.7 (162.5, 181.4) 38 (17, 54) 268 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Lee County No 170.5 (161.0, 180.4) 39 (18, 55) 255 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Dale County No 168.9 (154.7, 184.1) 40 (12, 63) 107 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2)
Cherokee County No 167.4 (150.0, 186.7) 41 (10, 65) 72 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 167.4 (163.3, 171.5) 42 (30, 51) 1,347 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Marshall County No 166.4 (156.3, 177.1) 43 (21, 60) 206 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Chilton County No 165.6 (150.7, 181.7) 44 (13, 65) 94 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Coosa County No 164.3 (136.8, 196.6) 45 (3, 67) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Montgomery County No 163.3 (156.3, 170.6) 46 (29, 59) 427 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Randolph County No 162.8 (143.4, 184.3) 47 (10, 66) 55 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Cullman County No 161.7 (151.1, 172.9) 48 (26, 63) 182 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Coffee County No 159.6 (146.1, 174.0) 49 (23, 65) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Washington County No 159.4 (136.6, 185.3) 50 (10, 67) 37 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Monroe County No 159.2 (139.5, 181.3) 51 (14, 66) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Butler County No 158.9 (138.5, 181.9) 52 (14, 67) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Winston County No 157.8 (139.9, 177.7) 53 (16, 66) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Cleburne County No 157.0 (133.8, 183.5) 54 (9, 67) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Hale County No 157.0 (133.2, 184.2) 55 (9, 67) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
DeKalb County No 156.8 (145.4, 168.9) 56 (30, 66) 145 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Lauderdale County No 156.1 (146.6, 166.1) 57 (34, 66) 211 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Greene County No 155.6 (125.8, 191.4) 58 (5, 67) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Baldwin County No 155.2 (149.0, 161.7) 59 (42, 65) 497 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Houston County No 154.4 (145.1, 164.1) 60 (36, 66) 215 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.3, -1.6)
Autauga County No 151.6 (138.6, 165.6) 61 (33, 66) 102 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Madison County No 151.1 (145.9, 156.5) 62 (49, 65) 659 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Tuscaloosa County No 148.3 (140.9, 155.9) 63 (48, 66) 320 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Limestone County No 147.9 (138.0, 158.3) 64 (44, 66) 173 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Pickens County No 144.4 (125.2, 166.0) 65 (27, 67) 42 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Choctaw County No 136.0 (114.3, 161.5) 66 (34, 67) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Shelby County No 126.7 (120.4, 133.2) 67 (64, 67) 321 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 12:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top