Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama *** 566.9 (561.9, 572.0) N/A 9,873 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States *** 512.0 (511.4, 512.6) N/A 568,048 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
DeKalb County *** 545.5 (505.4, 588.0) 50 (21, 65) 140 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.0)
Wilcox County *** 688.1 (580.3, 810.3) 3 (1, 57) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Bullock County *** 699.1 (580.7, 834.4) 2 (1, 58) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Crenshaw County *** 664.1 (570.1, 769.3) 6 (1, 57) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Marion County *** 605.8 (547.5, 668.6) 24 (3, 59) 80 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Walker County *** 719.4 (672.8, 768.3) 1 (1, 12) 183 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Lamar County *** 628.1 (541.4, 724.8) 12 (1, 62) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Perry County *** 548.0 (445.2, 667.6) 48 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Fayette County *** 641.0 (559.2, 731.5) 9 (1, 59) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Geneva County *** 625.8 (561.4, 695.6) 15 (1, 57) 70 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Sumter County *** 597.5 (501.4, 706.6) 29 (1, 66) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Clay County *** 617.0 (529.3, 715.0) 18 (1, 65) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Covington County *** 628.2 (574.5, 685.5) 11 (2, 50) 103 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Henry County *** 599.5 (523.5, 683.6) 28 (1, 65) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lawrence County *** 612.5 (553.1, 676.6) 20 (2, 58) 80 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lowndes County *** 634.1 (528.1, 755.2) 10 (1, 65) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Morgan County *** 567.1 (535.7, 599.8) 41 (18, 59) 249 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Randolph County *** 542.7 (478.8, 612.9) 51 (7, 66) 53 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Tallapoosa County *** 605.9 (554.7, 660.6) 23 (3, 57) 107 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Bibb County *** 595.2 (520.4, 677.6) 30 (2, 65) 47 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Butler County *** 521.6 (453.3, 597.3) 58 (13, 67) 43 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Chambers County *** 620.1 (562.0, 682.5) 16 (2, 57) 85 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Cherokee County *** 549.4 (490.9, 613.0) 47 (10, 66) 66 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Cullman County *** 560.8 (524.2, 599.3) 44 (15, 62) 178 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Jackson County *** 626.1 (578.9, 676.1) 14 (2, 47) 134 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Russell County *** 685.3 (631.2, 742.8) 4 (1, 26) 123 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
St. Clair County *** 592.4 (553.6, 633.1) 31 (8, 54) 181 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Washington County *** 609.5 (526.9, 701.3) 21 (1, 64) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Chilton County *** 574.5 (521.9, 630.9) 40 (6, 63) 90 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Clarke County *** 587.9 (522.5, 659.2) 36 (3, 64) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Colbert County *** 589.2 (545.2, 635.9) 35 (6, 58) 134 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Lee County *** 584.6 (550.7, 620.1) 37 (11, 55) 233 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Marshall County *** 561.3 (526.3, 598.1) 43 (17, 62) 195 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Talladega County *** 619.6 (580.0, 661.3) 17 (4, 47) 188 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Blount County *** 613.6 (567.7, 662.2) 19 (3, 51) 135 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Dale County *** 590.6 (540.4, 644.2) 32 (4, 60) 104 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Dallas County *** 645.7 (588.3, 707.1) 8 (1, 46) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Macon County *** 664.9 (584.4, 753.5) 5 (1, 54) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Marengo County *** 606.5 (531.5, 689.3) 22 (1, 63) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Coffee County *** 545.6 (498.6, 595.9) 49 (15, 65) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Elmore County *** 577.5 (536.0, 621.3) 38 (9, 60) 150 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Escambia County *** 651.1 (592.2, 714.2) 7 (1, 45) 91 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Etowah County *** 604.0 (570.2, 639.3) 26 (7, 48) 245 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Franklin County *** 561.7 (500.9, 627.9) 42 (7, 66) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Pike County *** 604.7 (538.8, 676.4) 25 (1, 62) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Baldwin County *** 532.2 (510.5, 554.6) 54 (39, 64) 466 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Barbour County *** 628.0 (559.0, 703.3) 13 (1, 58) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Monroe County *** 558.1 (490.8, 632.1) 46 (5, 66) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Winston County *** 531.6 (470.8, 598.1) 55 (12, 67) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Conecuh County *** 589.9 (503.7, 686.9) 33 (1, 66) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Coosa County *** 511.8 (427.7, 607.7) 59 (7, 67) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Jefferson County *** 576.7 (562.5, 591.2) 39 (24, 48) 1,299 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Cleburne County *** 500.0 (423.3, 586.7) 62 (13, 67) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Greene County *** 498.7 (401.8, 612.4) 63 (7, 67) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Hale County *** 511.0 (432.5, 599.6) 60 (11, 67) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Montgomery County *** 560.6 (536.3, 585.8) 45 (24, 58) 410 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Shelby County *** 436.4 (414.0, 459.7) 67 (63, 67) 296 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Calhoun County *** 603.1 (570.0, 637.5) 27 (8, 48) 256 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Mobile County *** 589.5 (571.6, 607.9) 34 (17, 45) 842 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Autauga County *** 536.1 (489.4, 586.0) 52 (18, 66) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Madison County *** 509.2 (491.0, 527.8) 61 (49, 66) 608 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Choctaw County *** 492.9 (417.1, 578.7) 66 (18, 67) 30 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Tuscaloosa County *** 525.5 (499.1, 552.9) 57 (39, 65) 310 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Limestone County *** 495.9 (461.1, 532.6) 65 (45, 67) 156 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Pickens County *** 496.5 (430.1, 570.3) 64 (18, 67) 41 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.4)
Lauderdale County *** 531.0 (498.4, 565.2) 56 (33, 65) 201 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.1)
Houston County *** 533.1 (500.8, 566.9) 53 (31, 65) 208 stable stable trend -7.1 (-15.5, 2.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/23/2021 5:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top