Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama No 166.9 (165.2, 168.6) N/A 7,913 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Jefferson County No 161.5 (156.3, 166.7) 48 (34, 56) 788 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Mobile County No 174.7 (168.3, 181.3) 30 (17, 44) 590 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Madison County No 155.8 (149.7, 162.0) 52 (39, 61) 523 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Baldwin County No 155.4 (148.8, 162.2) 53 (38, 61) 454 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Shelby County No 128.9 (122.2, 135.9) 66 (60, 67) 289 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Morgan County No 175.6 (165.6, 186.1) 29 (12, 48) 241 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Calhoun County No 186.4 (175.4, 197.9) 16 (5, 38) 228 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Tuscaloosa County No 142.9 (134.4, 151.7) 61 (50, 66) 222 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Etowah County No 179.6 (168.9, 191.0) 26 (9, 45) 221 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Montgomery County No 155.2 (145.5, 165.5) 55 (34, 63) 207 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Marshall County No 171.0 (160.2, 182.3) 36 (14, 55) 199 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Lauderdale County No 154.3 (144.4, 164.8) 57 (33, 64) 191 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Lee County No 167.7 (157.0, 179.0) 41 (17, 58) 190 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
St. Clair County No 179.9 (168.2, 192.2) 25 (8, 45) 184 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Cullman County No 165.7 (154.8, 177.2) 46 (20, 60) 180 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Walker County No 203.9 (190.2, 218.5) 4 (1, 22) 173 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Houston County No 149.2 (138.8, 160.2) 59 (39, 65) 162 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.0, -1.5)
Talladega County No 190.4 (176.7, 205.1) 12 (3, 39) 152 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Limestone County No 151.1 (140.3, 162.6) 58 (36, 65) 151 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Jackson County No 203.1 (187.9, 219.4) 5 (1, 25) 142 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Blount County No 190.2 (176.1, 205.3) 14 (3, 41) 141 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
DeKalb County No 161.9 (149.8, 174.8) 47 (21, 62) 140 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Elmore County No 169.6 (156.9, 183.2) 39 (14, 58) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Colbert County No 183.2 (168.6, 198.9) 19 (5, 48) 123 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Covington County No 190.4 (173.4, 209.0) 13 (2, 44) 98 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Dale County No 174.5 (158.5, 192.0) 31 (8, 58) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Coffee County No 167.4 (152.0, 184.1) 43 (11, 61) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Autauga County No 154.6 (140.1, 170.4) 56 (24, 65) 85 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Chilton County No 166.0 (150.1, 183.3) 45 (14, 62) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Tallapoosa County No 172.9 (155.5, 192.0) 33 (7, 61) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Marion County No 182.4 (164.5, 202.0) 21 (3, 52) 80 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Russell County No 211.5 (190.7, 234.2) 2 (1, 26) 80 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Lawrence County No 196.6 (176.8, 218.3) 6 (1, 41) 75 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Escambia County No 210.9 (189.3, 234.7) 3 (1, 29) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Cherokee County No 167.9 (150.0, 187.8) 40 (10, 63) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Geneva County No 189.1 (168.9, 211.4) 15 (1, 51) 67 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Franklin County No 183.0 (163.1, 205.0) 20 (2, 55) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Chambers County No 194.5 (172.5, 219.0) 7 (1, 47) 61 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Winston County No 160.2 (141.8, 180.7) 49 (13, 65) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Randolph County No 166.0 (144.5, 190.4) 44 (6, 64) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Pike County No 178.9 (155.3, 205.4) 27 (2, 61) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bibb County No 191.8 (166.8, 219.9) 11 (1, 51) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Fayette County No 184.0 (158.9, 212.6) 17 (1, 61) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Barbour County No 192.2 (165.6, 222.8) 10 (1, 58) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Dallas County No 194.2 (166.0, 226.9) 8 (1, 57) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Clarke County No 167.6 (143.1, 195.8) 42 (4, 65) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Henry County No 174.2 (148.6, 203.8) 32 (2, 64) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Lamar County No 183.5 (156.4, 214.6) 18 (1, 63) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Crenshaw County No 223.9 (190.3, 262.6) 1 (1, 36) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Cleburne County No 157.1 (133.2, 184.5) 50 (9, 67) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Clay County No 180.3 (152.4, 212.7) 23 (1, 64) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Monroe County No 156.3 (131.7, 185.1) 51 (9, 67) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Butler County No 148.2 (123.4, 177.7) 60 (13, 67) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Marengo County No 172.3 (142.5, 207.7) 34 (1, 66) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Washington County No 155.4 (129.3, 186.0) 54 (7, 67) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Pickens County No 140.0 (116.5, 168.0) 62 (25, 67) 26 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.2)
Coosa County No 171.4 (138.4, 211.9) 35 (1, 67) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Conecuh County No 179.9 (145.1, 222.8) 24 (1, 66) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Choctaw County No 134.6 (107.7, 168.0) 64 (20, 67) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Hale County No 133.1 (102.2, 172.4) 65 (15, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Wilcox County No 181.4 (133.7, 247.4) 22 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Macon County No 177.7 (125.5, 248.2) 28 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Sumter County No 193.6 (129.7, 280.1) 9 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Lowndes County No 169.6 (118.2, 242.9) 38 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Perry County No 139.5 (97.7, 202.7) 63 (2, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Greene County No 169.9 (112.0, 269.6) 37 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Bullock County No 127.3 (84.2, 197.9) 67 (5, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 7:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top