Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama N/A No 160.8 (159.1, 162.4) N/A 7,897 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Pickens County Urban No 158.8 (133.2, 188.9) 49 (4, 65) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 9.7)
DeKalb County Rural No 166.3 (154.1, 179.3) 37 (13, 58) 146 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 4.7)
Greene County Urban No 236.0 (148.2, 371.0) 1 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Crenshaw County Rural No 211.5 (177.9, 250.4) 2 (1, 46) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Cherokee County Rural No 181.7 (162.6, 202.9) 18 (2, 53) 71 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Coosa County Rural No 170.3 (137.3, 210.9) 32 (1, 65) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Covington County Rural No 188.7 (171.9, 206.9) 8 (1, 42) 100 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Fayette County Rural No 182.1 (156.4, 211.3) 16 (1, 60) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Geneva County Urban No 182.0 (162.1, 204.0) 17 (2, 54) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lawrence County Urban No 199.8 (179.9, 221.5) 4 (1, 34) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Randolph County Rural No 157.3 (136.0, 181.4) 50 (8, 65) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Wilcox County Rural No 164.6 (119.6, 227.8) 43 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.7)
Dallas County Rural No 180.0 (153.0, 211.7) 21 (1, 61) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Escambia County Rural No 197.1 (176.2, 220.1) 5 (1, 40) 69 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Henry County Urban No 170.0 (144.6, 199.5) 34 (2, 64) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 166.1 (149.3, 184.6) 38 (8, 61) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Chilton County Urban No 176.2 (159.8, 193.9) 23 (3, 54) 90 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Clay County Rural No 176.1 (149.9, 206.5) 24 (2, 62) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Jackson County Rural No 197.0 (182.4, 212.6) 6 (1, 27) 144 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Marion County Rural No 180.8 (163.2, 200.1) 20 (2, 51) 80 falling falling trend -0.6 (-4.7, -0.1)
Monroe County Rural No 166.0 (139.9, 196.5) 41 (3, 64) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Russell County Urban No 203.2 (182.9, 225.4) 3 (1, 32) 78 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Talladega County Rural No 183.6 (170.2, 197.9) 11 (3, 44) 148 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Barbour County Rural No 181.7 (156.4, 211.2) 19 (1, 60) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 191.9 (172.0, 213.6) 7 (1, 45) 71 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lowndes County Urban No 141.9 (98.3, 206.2) 61 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Macon County Urban No 185.2 (134.9, 251.9) 10 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Chambers County Rural No 173.9 (153.8, 196.4) 27 (3, 61) 58 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Clarke County Rural No 183.4 (157.0, 213.7) 12 (1, 60) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Colbert County Urban No 173.7 (159.8, 188.7) 28 (6, 53) 121 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Sumter County Rural No 183.1 (118.3, 271.5) 13 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Blount County Urban No 174.4 (161.1, 188.6) 25 (7, 52) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Butler County Rural No 168.6 (140.5, 201.7) 35 (2, 64) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Cleburne County Rural No 173.7 (148.9, 201.9) 29 (2, 62) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Coffee County Rural No 164.6 (149.5, 181.0) 42 (11, 61) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Dale County Rural No 174.1 (158.0, 191.5) 26 (5, 56) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Etowah County Urban No 183.0 (172.2, 194.4) 14 (4, 40) 228 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.6)
Houston County Urban No 148.7 (138.5, 159.6) 56 (36, 63) 166 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lee County Urban No 160.8 (150.9, 171.3) 47 (23, 59) 203 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Pike County Rural No 171.2 (148.3, 197.0) 31 (2, 62) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Bibb County Urban No 177.4 (153.8, 203.9) 22 (1, 60) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Hale County Urban No 155.6 (120.5, 199.4) 52 (2, 66) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Elmore County Urban No 164.3 (152.4, 177.1) 44 (16, 59) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Morgan County Urban No 162.5 (153.1, 172.4) 45 (21, 57) 234 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.0, -0.6)
Perry County Rural Yes 113.5 (76.6, 173.1) 66 (19, 67) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Washington County Rural No 145.8 (120.3, 176.0) 60 (9, 67) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Winston County Rural No 161.5 (143.1, 182.1) 46 (9, 63) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Calhoun County Urban No 182.1 (171.3, 193.5) 15 (5, 39) 225 falling falling trend -1.3 (-5.6, -0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 153.7 (148.8, 158.8) 54 (40, 59) 763 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -1.1)
Lamar County Rural No 171.8 (146.3, 201.2) 30 (2, 63) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.3, -0.6)
Mobile County Urban No 170.1 (163.8, 176.6) 33 (19, 46) 580 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -1.2)
Montgomery County Urban No 154.8 (144.9, 165.3) 53 (30, 62) 203 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
St. Clair County Urban No 166.0 (155.2, 177.4) 39 (15, 56) 183 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 166.3 (155.8, 177.5) 36 (16, 55) 194 falling falling trend -1.4 (-4.4, -0.8)
Choctaw County Rural No 159.0 (129.8, 194.6) 48 (2, 66) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Conecuh County Rural No 166.0 (130.0, 211.0) 40 (1, 66) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Madison County Urban No 146.2 (140.5, 152.0) 59 (47, 63) 523 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.2)
Autauga County Urban No 151.5 (137.7, 166.5) 55 (26, 64) 90 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Limestone County Urban No 140.9 (130.9, 151.6) 62 (46, 65) 153 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Baldwin County Urban No 148.4 (142.3, 154.8) 58 (43, 63) 473 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.3, -1.4)
Shelby County Urban Yes 121.6 (115.3, 128.1) 65 (61, 67) 291 stable stable trend -2.6 (-4.6, 0.4)
Lauderdale County Urban No 148.6 (138.8, 159.0) 57 (37, 63) 184 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.6, -1.6)
Cullman County Rural No 155.9 (145.7, 166.8) 51 (27, 61) 182 falling falling trend -2.9 (-7.1, -1.3)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 130.9 (123.2, 139.0) 64 (58, 66) 225 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -2.2)
Walker County Urban No 188.1 (175.0, 201.9) 9 (2, 36) 164 falling falling trend -3.4 (-8.0, -1.3)
Bullock County Rural Yes 80.3 (47.5, 142.0) 67 (55, 67) 4 falling falling trend -18.7 (-44.7, -4.9)
Marengo County Rural No 134.2 (108.7, 165.3) 63 (17, 67) 21 falling falling trend -20.7 (-31.9, -4.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 6:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top