Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Arkansas Yes 151.5 (149.0, 154.0) 2,962 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
United States Yes 137.7 (137.4, 137.9) 280,047 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Perry County No 179.0 (136.9, 231.2) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Lawrence County No 169.1 (138.8, 205.1) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Randolph County No 170.3 (140.0, 206.0) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Jackson County No 178.3 (146.2, 216.1) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.7)
Cleburne County Yes 154.7 (131.6, 181.5) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Dallas County No 176.9 (129.9, 237.5) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Lincoln County No 163.9 (125.0, 212.3) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Miller County No 175.7 (153.9, 200.0) 49 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Newton County Yes 145.3 (104.4, 199.9) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Poinsett County No 213.1 (182.7, 247.4) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Searcy County No 185.4 (143.0, 240.1) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Monroe County No 222.5 (170.8, 287.2) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Montgomery County Yes 119.3 (87.5, 162.4) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Franklin County Yes 142.3 (114.7, 175.4) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Madison County No 174.5 (140.1, 215.5) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Scott County No 178.9 (138.2, 229.3) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 1.9)
Calhoun County No 198.2 (139.0, 278.3) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Clay County No 178.9 (147.2, 216.6) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Fulton County Yes 130.3 (101.3, 167.5) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Howard County Yes 146.2 (113.3, 186.5) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Johnson County Yes 158.8 (132.0, 189.8) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Little River County Yes 123.7 (93.3, 162.1) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Logan County No 176.7 (148.0, 209.9) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Columbia County No 162.6 (135.9, 193.6) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Nevada County Yes 160.0 (116.1, 216.3) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Ouachita County Yes 159.7 (134.2, 189.1) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Phillips County No 215.8 (181.6, 255.0) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Yell County No 196.0 (164.8, 232.0) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Pope County No 164.4 (146.4, 184.1) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Ashley County No 190.6 (160.5, 225.2) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Baxter County Yes 158.1 (139.7, 178.8) 67 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Benton County Yes 137.9 (129.1, 147.1) 187 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Bradley County No 168.6 (131.3, 214.5) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Chicot County No 171.5 (133.6, 218.5) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Greene County Yes 136.8 (118.0, 157.9) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Boone County Yes 161.2 (140.1, 184.9) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Carroll County Yes 149.9 (127.0, 176.4) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Grant County Yes 151.2 (121.1, 187.2) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Hot Spring County Yes 160.9 (138.0, 187.0) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Pike County Yes 140.1 (105.7, 183.7) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Sharp County Yes 156.0 (127.6, 190.0) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Union County No 180.4 (159.0, 204.2) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Craighead County Yes 146.6 (132.9, 161.4) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Crawford County Yes 149.8 (133.1, 168.3) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Independence County Yes 138.0 (117.9, 160.8) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Jefferson County No 170.6 (154.2, 188.3) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Lee County Yes 154.1 (112.4, 208.1) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Marion County Yes 153.0 (125.1, 187.1) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Mississippi County No 180.3 (157.7, 205.4) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Polk County No 172.6 (143.0, 207.2) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Prairie County Yes 146.9 (106.9, 199.4) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Arkansas County Yes 146.2 (117.7, 180.0) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Cleveland County Yes 159.5 (117.9, 213.0) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Drew County Yes 144.5 (115.7, 178.8) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Faulkner County Yes 127.0 (114.4, 140.6) 76 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Saline County Yes 142.3 (130.3, 155.1) 107 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Sebastian County Yes 155.4 (143.2, 168.4) 124 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Clark County Yes 136.6 (111.1, 166.8) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Hempstead County Yes 137.6 (112.2, 167.4) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Lonoke County Yes 150.4 (133.6, 168.7) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Crittenden County No 181.0 (159.3, 204.9) 52 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Pulaski County Yes 143.9 (137.1, 151.0) 353 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Washington County Yes 134.1 (124.2, 144.4) 142 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
White County Yes 156.9 (141.4, 173.6) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Desha County Yes 146.6 (112.5, 188.7) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Izard County Yes 144.3 (114.7, 181.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
St. Francis County Yes 157.8 (131.2, 188.7) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Sevier County Yes 152.0 (118.7, 191.9) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Woodruff County Yes 144.8 (104.9, 198.5) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Conway County Yes 127.7 (103.8, 156.1) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Lafayette County Yes 96.3 (63.2, 144.0) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Cross County No 181.5 (149.1, 219.4) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Stone County Yes 144.1 (111.3, 185.3) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Garland County Yes 136.3 (124.9, 148.6) 116 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Van Buren County Yes 105.3 (82.9, 133.5) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.0, -2.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/07/2020 5:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top