Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California No 158.3 (157.5, 159.1) N/A 30,954 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Alameda County No 143.5 (139.7, 147.4) 48 (41, 52) 1,137 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.2)
Amador County No 169.0 (150.1, 190.1) 23 (5, 50) 61 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Butte County No 194.1 (183.4, 205.3) 9 (2, 18) 258 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Calaveras County No 166.5 (148.9, 186.3) 25 (7, 50) 71 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Colusa County No 144.1 (114.2, 179.6) 47 (7, 56) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Contra Costa County No 151.4 (147.0, 155.9) 40 (31, 48) 926 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Del Norte County No 197.4 (168.0, 230.7) 6 (1, 38) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
El Dorado County No 142.8 (133.7, 152.4) 49 (33, 55) 197 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Fresno County No 165.4 (159.8, 171.0) 26 (19, 36) 706 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
Glenn County No 194.3 (164.0, 228.6) 8 (1, 46) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Humboldt County No 200.0 (185.8, 214.9) 5 (1, 17) 160 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Imperial County No 153.1 (141.3, 165.6) 38 (20, 52) 128 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Inyo County No 177.5 (146.3, 214.2) 16 (1, 54) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Kern County No 172.6 (166.3, 179.0) 19 (12, 29) 621 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Kings County No 171.9 (156.9, 187.9) 21 (7, 42) 102 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lake County No 206.2 (187.9, 226.1) 3 (1, 18) 102 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Lassen County No 160.3 (133.6, 190.7) 32 (4, 56) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Los Angeles County No 156.8 (155.2, 158.4) 35 (29, 40) 7,433 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
Madera County No 172.5 (159.3, 186.4) 20 (8, 39) 132 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Marin County No 129.4 (122.2, 137.1) 55 (48, 56) 244 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Mariposa County No 162.7 (132.8, 198.7) 28 (2, 56) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Mendocino County No 182.9 (167.3, 199.6) 13 (3, 33) 112 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Merced County No 179.1 (167.8, 190.9) 14 (6, 29) 197 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Modoc County No 146.3 (108.2, 196.2) 45 (2, 56) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Mono County Yes 54.2 (35.4, 80.8) 57 (56, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.6)
Monterey County No 139.4 (132.2, 146.9) 51 (40, 55) 291 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Napa County No 163.3 (151.6, 175.7) 27 (14, 47) 149 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Nevada County No 150.7 (138.8, 163.6) 41 (22, 53) 130 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Orange County No 148.6 (145.9, 151.3) 44 (36, 49) 2,419 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
Placer County No 155.5 (148.6, 162.6) 37 (23, 48) 395 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Plumas County No 170.8 (142.5, 204.4) 22 (1, 55) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Riverside County No 161.1 (157.9, 164.3) 31 (23, 37) 2,018 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Sacramento County No 177.4 (173.0, 181.9) 17 (11, 24) 1,301 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
San Benito County No 142.0 (122.2, 163.9) 50 (17, 56) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
San Bernardino County No 175.5 (171.5, 179.6) 18 (12, 25) 1,564 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
San Diego County No 161.8 (159.0, 164.6) 29 (22, 36) 2,631 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
San Francisco County No 144.8 (140.0, 149.7) 46 (38, 52) 713 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
San Joaquin County No 183.2 (176.6, 190.0) 12 (6, 22) 611 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
San Luis Obispo County No 158.7 (150.5, 167.2) 33 (20, 46) 298 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
San Mateo County No 134.0 (129.0, 139.1) 53 (47, 56) 566 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.4)
Santa Barbara County No 148.9 (142.0, 156.1) 43 (30, 51) 354 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Santa Clara County No 131.1 (127.8, 134.4) 54 (49, 56) 1,231 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Santa Cruz County No 149.0 (139.8, 158.6) 42 (26, 53) 217 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Shasta County No 201.8 (190.4, 213.8) 4 (1, 13) 246 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Sierra County No 123.3 (72.3, 213.2) 56 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Siskiyou County No 213.0 (190.8, 237.4) 2 (1, 16) 75 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Solano County No 196.1 (187.9, 204.6) 7 (2, 14) 457 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Sonoma County No 156.8 (150.5, 163.4) 34 (23, 45) 485 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9)
Stanislaus County No 187.2 (179.4, 195.1) 11 (4, 20) 462 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Sutter County No 177.7 (161.8, 194.8) 15 (4, 38) 94 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Tehama County No 190.8 (172.4, 210.7) 10 (1, 30) 82 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Trinity County No 135.0 (106.6, 171.1) 52 (11, 56) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Tulare County No 167.4 (159.0, 176.0) 24 (14, 37) 318 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Tuolumne County No 161.7 (145.1, 180.0) 30 (10, 52) 75 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Ventura County No 151.6 (146.5, 156.8) 39 (30, 49) 690 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Yolo County No 156.5 (145.2, 168.5) 36 (18, 50) 146 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Yuba County No 218.1 (196.2, 241.7) 1 (1, 12) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Alpine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 3:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top