Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 155.8 (155.0, 156.6) N/A 31,087 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.6)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Alameda County Urban No 137.9 (134.3, 141.7) 49 (42, 52) 1,128 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -2.2)
Butte County Urban No 203.3 (192.0, 215.2) 4 (1, 11) 255 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Contra Costa County Urban No 146.7 (142.4, 151.1) 41 (34, 48) 922 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
El Dorado County Urban No 146.2 (137.1, 155.9) 44 (29, 51) 208 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Fresno County Urban No 163.4 (157.9, 169.0) 27 (18, 35) 710 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Imperial County Urban No 135.9 (124.8, 147.7) 50 (33, 56) 114 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Kern County Urban No 166.4 (160.3, 172.6) 20 (14, 34) 616 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Kings County Urban No 165.0 (150.4, 180.5) 23 (9, 46) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Los Angeles County Urban No 153.1 (151.5, 154.7) 35 (30, 40) 7,369 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.7, -1.6)
Madera County Urban No 165.0 (152.1, 178.7) 24 (10, 44) 127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Marin County Urban No 129.2 (122.1, 136.7) 53 (45, 56) 253 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Merced County Urban No 174.3 (163.2, 185.8) 16 (8, 33) 197 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Monterey County Urban No 135.0 (128.0, 142.3) 51 (41, 55) 290 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Napa County Urban No 149.3 (138.4, 161.0) 39 (22, 52) 141 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Orange County Urban No 146.5 (143.9, 149.2) 43 (35, 47) 2,447 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.7)
Placer County Urban No 153.7 (147.0, 160.6) 34 (24, 46) 407 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Riverside County Urban No 163.1 (159.9, 166.3) 28 (19, 34) 2,062 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Sacramento County Urban No 173.5 (169.2, 177.9) 18 (11, 24) 1,321 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
San Benito County Urban No 156.9 (136.4, 179.5) 33 (8, 54) 46 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
San Bernardino County Urban No 174.7 (170.7, 178.8) 15 (11, 24) 1,581 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -1.5)
San Diego County Urban No 163.4 (160.6, 166.3) 26 (19, 34) 2,671 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
San Francisco County Urban No 139.2 (134.5, 143.9) 48 (40, 52) 696 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
San Joaquin County Urban No 176.3 (169.9, 182.8) 12 (9, 25) 616 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 159.8 (151.6, 168.3) 32 (18, 41) 303 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
San Mateo County Urban No 132.3 (127.4, 137.3) 52 (45, 55) 567 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -2.3)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 143.8 (137.1, 150.9) 45 (33, 51) 349 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Santa Clara County Urban No 128.3 (125.1, 131.6) 54 (49, 56) 1,234 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 146.5 (137.6, 155.9) 42 (28, 51) 219 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Shasta County Urban No 196.6 (185.4, 208.4) 8 (1, 13) 244 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Solano County Urban No 188.9 (181.0, 197.1) 9 (4, 15) 453 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Sonoma County Urban No 161.2 (154.8, 167.9) 29 (18, 38) 499 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.9, 3.6)
Stanislaus County Urban No 186.0 (178.3, 193.9) 11 (5, 17) 465 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Sutter County Urban No 165.2 (150.1, 181.4) 22 (8, 46) 91 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Tulare County Urban No 176.2 (167.6, 185.0) 13 (8, 27) 340 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.4)
Ventura County Urban No 148.2 (143.2, 153.3) 40 (31, 47) 688 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Yolo County Urban No 169.5 (157.7, 182.0) 19 (9, 37) 158 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Yuba County Urban No 197.3 (176.9, 219.3) 7 (1, 23) 74 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Amador County Rural No 164.7 (146.4, 185.3) 25 (7, 48) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Calaveras County Rural No 160.0 (142.6, 179.5) 31 (9, 51) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Colusa County Rural No 141.8 (112.7, 176.4) 47 (9, 56) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Del Norte County Rural No 218.6 (187.8, 253.3) 1 (1, 17) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Glenn County Rural No 218.2 (186.5, 253.8) 2 (1, 23) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Humboldt County Rural No 207.3 (193.0, 222.4) 3 (1, 11) 168 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.5)
Inyo County Rural No 149.9 (123.2, 181.7) 38 (8, 56) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Lake County Rural No 187.2 (170.5, 205.3) 10 (2, 29) 101 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Lassen County Rural No 160.5 (134.5, 190.1) 30 (4, 55) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Mariposa County Rural No 150.0 (123.1, 182.6) 37 (7, 56) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Mendocino County Rural No 175.2 (160.6, 191.0) 14 (5, 36) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Modoc County Rural No 174.2 (132.0, 228.6) 17 (1, 56) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Mono County Rural Yes 53.7 (34.7, 80.9) 57 (56, 57) 6 falling falling trend -17.9 (-46.0, -3.9)
Nevada County Rural No 142.6 (131.1, 154.9) 46 (29, 55) 128 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Plumas County Rural No 152.1 (126.8, 182.4) 36 (8, 55) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Sierra County Rural Yes 110.8 (64.7, 192.7) 55 (5, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Siskiyou County Rural No 198.6 (177.0, 222.5) 6 (1, 25) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Tehama County Rural No 202.2 (183.3, 222.7) 5 (1, 18) 88 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Trinity County Rural Yes 107.3 (84.8, 135.8) 56 (41, 56) 18 falling falling trend -6.9 (-15.9, -4.0)
Tuolumne County Rural No 166.1 (149.5, 184.4) 21 (8, 47) 80 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/08/2024 11:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top