Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado No 130.0 (128.6, 131.3) N/A 7,961 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Cheyenne County No 251.7 (172.5, 360.1) 1 (1, 37) 7 stable stable trend 18.7 (-3.1, 45.3)
Baca County No 183.3 (138.3, 242.0) 2 (1, 43) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Prowers County No 178.8 (150.0, 211.8) 3 (1, 27) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Jackson County No 172.4 (103.9, 280.7) 4 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Sedgwick County No 164.0 (111.8, 238.8) 5 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Huerfano County No 163.9 (132.6, 203.1) 6 (1, 43) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Delta County No 163.6 (147.7, 181.1) 7 (2, 23) 88 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Morgan County No 162.8 (144.2, 183.3) 8 (2, 29) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Otero County No 157.6 (136.5, 181.4) 9 (2, 36) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Bent County No 153.6 (117.4, 199.3) 10 (1, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Pueblo County No 152.8 (145.6, 160.4) 11 (5, 22) 352 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Crowley County No 149.2 (109.2, 200.8) 12 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Moffat County No 148.9 (121.9, 180.3) 13 (2, 49) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Fremont County No 148.4 (136.0, 161.8) 14 (5, 32) 111 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Rio Grande County No 147.7 (121.6, 178.5) 15 (2, 47) 24 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Rio Blanco County No 147.2 (109.8, 193.8) 16 (1, 54) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Washington County No 147.0 (110.9, 193.2) 17 (1, 55) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Lincoln County No 146.9 (110.8, 192.2) 18 (2, 54) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Logan County No 145.8 (126.7, 167.3) 19 (4, 44) 44 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Yuma County No 145.7 (117.0, 179.7) 20 (2, 51) 19 stable stable trend 2.4 (-4.1, 9.3)
El Paso County No 142.4 (138.4, 146.5) 21 (12, 27) 996 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Adams County 8 No 141.9 (136.7, 147.2) 22 (11, 29) 603 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Las Animas County No 138.9 (117.9, 163.2) 23 (4, 49) 34 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Denver County No 138.1 (134.1, 142.3) 24 (15, 31) 911 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Mesa County No 136.5 (129.4, 143.8) 25 (14, 36) 295 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Conejos County No 135.3 (105.9, 171.2) 26 (2, 54) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Weld County 8 No 134.1 (128.1, 140.2) 27 (17, 37) 399 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Montrose County No 133.3 (120.9, 146.9) 28 (11, 45) 93 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Kiowa County No 132.8 (74.3, 230.4) 29 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Alamosa County No 131.4 (107.4, 159.2) 30 (5, 54) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Montezuma County No 129.6 (113.8, 147.3) 31 (10, 49) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jefferson County 8 No 127.5 (123.8, 131.4) 32 (24, 41) 911 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Arapahoe County No 126.4 (122.5, 130.4) 33 (25, 41) 828 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Garfield County No 125.0 (112.1, 138.9) 34 (16, 49) 74 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Saguache County No 124.2 (94.2, 162.5) 35 (4, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
San Miguel County No 124.1 (84.1, 175.2) 36 (2, 61) 8
*
*
Teller County Yes 122.7 (104.8, 143.0) 37 (13, 53) 43 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Larimer County Yes 122.5 (117.6, 127.5) 38 (27, 45) 495 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Elbert County Yes 120.4 (102.4, 140.8) 39 (13, 54) 37 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.4)
Broomfield County 8 Yes 120.1 (108.9, 132.0) 40 (22, 51) 88 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.0, -1.7)
Phillips County Yes 119.4 (83.9, 167.0) 41 (3, 60) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Boulder County 8 Yes 118.7 (113.6, 124.1) 42 (31, 49) 418 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Chaffee County Yes 118.1 (101.8, 137.0) 43 (16, 55) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Custer County Yes 118.1 (83.7, 165.7) 44 (3, 60) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Dolores County Yes 112.0 (68.5, 182.7) 45 (3, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
La Plata County Yes 111.8 (100.4, 124.2) 46 (29, 54) 77 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Douglas County Yes 110.3 (105.0, 115.9) 47 (38, 52) 345 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Gunnison County Yes 109.5 (86.4, 136.9) 48 (14, 58) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Clear Creek County Yes 103.3 (78.2, 134.8) 49 (14, 60) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Archuleta County Yes 101.4 (82.3, 124.5) 50 (25, 59) 24 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Gilpin County Yes 100.8 (64.8, 149.9) 51 (5, 61) 7
*
*
Costilla County Yes 98.0 (65.1, 145.5) 52 (7, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Lake County Yes 95.4 (65.8, 133.8) 53 (14, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
Routt County Yes 94.6 (77.8, 114.0) 54 (33, 60) 25 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Kit Carson County Yes 94.6 (70.2, 125.9) 55 (20, 61) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.0)
Grand County Yes 93.9 (73.1, 119.1) 56 (30, 61) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Park County Yes 87.5 (70.1, 108.6) 57 (39, 61) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Ouray County Yes 80.1 (53.9, 119.0) 58 (31, 61) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.1)
Eagle County Yes 69.9 (58.5, 82.7) 59 (53, 61) 33 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.6)
Pitkin County Yes 67.1 (52.9, 84.5) 60 (52, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Summit County Yes 63.6 (49.4, 80.6) 61 (54, 61) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Hinsdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 11:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top